Free, Prior, and Informed Consent and Human rights impact assessments: Lessons from Repsol's operations in Wayuu territories in La Guajira, Colombia

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Laurence Klein , María Jesús Muñoz-Torres , María Ángeles Fernández Izquierdo
{"title":"Free, Prior, and Informed Consent and Human rights impact assessments: Lessons from Repsol's operations in Wayuu territories in La Guajira, Colombia","authors":"Laurence Klein ,&nbsp;María Jesús Muñoz-Torres ,&nbsp;María Ángeles Fernández Izquierdo","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite the clear international consensus on the need for good faith consultations with Indigenous Peoples prior to the exploitation of natural resources on their lands and territories, most companies still struggle to respect their right to Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) as an expression of their right to self-determination. This translates into companies investing in obtaining community consent, whereby the financial implications of going ahead with a project without FPIC usually overshadow the ethical reasons sustaining this core human right. Amidst the global demand for heightened human rights due diligence (HRDD), collaborative and Indigenous-led Human Rights Impact Assessments (HRIA) emerge as a crucial tool to further the implementation of FPIC and HRDD at the corporate level. Given that there is still little literature on such HRIA, our systematisation of Repsol's experience on Wayuu territories in Colombia is a timely contribution to filling some of the practical gaps. Even though Repsol undoubtfully had financial reasons for not going ahead with its project in La Guajira, the case study also demonstrates that the company heavily invests in respecting Indigenous rights, an example to be followed by other companies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 105554"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725000960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the clear international consensus on the need for good faith consultations with Indigenous Peoples prior to the exploitation of natural resources on their lands and territories, most companies still struggle to respect their right to Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) as an expression of their right to self-determination. This translates into companies investing in obtaining community consent, whereby the financial implications of going ahead with a project without FPIC usually overshadow the ethical reasons sustaining this core human right. Amidst the global demand for heightened human rights due diligence (HRDD), collaborative and Indigenous-led Human Rights Impact Assessments (HRIA) emerge as a crucial tool to further the implementation of FPIC and HRDD at the corporate level. Given that there is still little literature on such HRIA, our systematisation of Repsol's experience on Wayuu territories in Colombia is a timely contribution to filling some of the practical gaps. Even though Repsol undoubtfully had financial reasons for not going ahead with its project in La Guajira, the case study also demonstrates that the company heavily invests in respecting Indigenous rights, an example to be followed by other companies.
自由、事先和知情同意与人权影响评估:雷普索尔公司在哥伦比亚拉瓜希拉瓦尤族地区开展业务的经验教训
尽管国际上有明确的共识,即在开采土著人民的土地和领土上的自然资源之前,需要与他们进行真诚的协商,但大多数公司仍然难以尊重土著人民的自由、事先和知情同意权(FPIC),这是他们自决权的一种表达。这就意味着公司需要投资获得社区的同意,因此,在没有FPIC的情况下继续进行项目的财务影响通常会掩盖维持这一核心人权的道德原因。在加强人权尽职调查(HRDD)的全球需求中,协作和土著主导的人权影响评估(HRIA)成为在企业层面进一步实施FPIC和HRDD的关键工具。鉴于关于此类HRIA的文献仍然很少,我们将雷普索尔在哥伦比亚瓦尤族领土上的经验系统化,是对填补一些实际空白的及时贡献。尽管Repsol毫无疑问有财务原因不继续在La Guajira的项目,但案例研究也表明,该公司在尊重土著权利方面投入了大量资金,这是其他公司效仿的榜样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信