Behavioral intention to use parcel lockers in the last mile and underlying linkages with travel modal choice

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Eshwar Dayal , Lisa Khuntia , Lakshay Lakshay , Heleen Buldeo Rai , Agnivesh Pani
{"title":"Behavioral intention to use parcel lockers in the last mile and underlying linkages with travel modal choice","authors":"Eshwar Dayal ,&nbsp;Lisa Khuntia ,&nbsp;Lakshay Lakshay ,&nbsp;Heleen Buldeo Rai ,&nbsp;Agnivesh Pani","doi":"10.1016/j.retrec.2025.101568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As e-commerce expands globally, using parcel lockers is becoming more and more common. Ultimately, our study contributes to a better understanding of last-mile delivery intents by providing insightful information to legislators and courier businesses seeking to encourage locker usage. After an online survey was completed in Mumbai, India, a Latent class cluster analysis and structural equation modeling were used to examine the variables influencing parcel locker users' usage. The study is unique in that it looks at three clusters: regular transit users, car owners, and those who own and use two-wheelers to explore the relationship between transportation mode choice and intention to utilize parcel lockers. According to the findings, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived risks, and shopping preference are among the major drivers of behavioral intention to use parcel lockers. Owners of motorcycles and bicycles showed a positive correlation between all parameters and their intention to use parcel lockers, suggesting that ease of access will lead them to utilize this service. The relevance of convenience in locker accessibility was shown by the positive link between perceived usefulness and attitude among regular transit users. Contrary, car owners only indicated a positive correlation with perceived ease of use, indicating a low propensity to use parcel lockers. These results highlight the necessity for urban logistics regulations to adjust to new delivery models like parcel lockers by matching service offerings to various means of transportation and considering locker placement. In cities, these flexible regulations may increase accessibility and encourage creative last-mile solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47810,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Economics","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 101568"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885925000514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As e-commerce expands globally, using parcel lockers is becoming more and more common. Ultimately, our study contributes to a better understanding of last-mile delivery intents by providing insightful information to legislators and courier businesses seeking to encourage locker usage. After an online survey was completed in Mumbai, India, a Latent class cluster analysis and structural equation modeling were used to examine the variables influencing parcel locker users' usage. The study is unique in that it looks at three clusters: regular transit users, car owners, and those who own and use two-wheelers to explore the relationship between transportation mode choice and intention to utilize parcel lockers. According to the findings, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived risks, and shopping preference are among the major drivers of behavioral intention to use parcel lockers. Owners of motorcycles and bicycles showed a positive correlation between all parameters and their intention to use parcel lockers, suggesting that ease of access will lead them to utilize this service. The relevance of convenience in locker accessibility was shown by the positive link between perceived usefulness and attitude among regular transit users. Contrary, car owners only indicated a positive correlation with perceived ease of use, indicating a low propensity to use parcel lockers. These results highlight the necessity for urban logistics regulations to adjust to new delivery models like parcel lockers by matching service offerings to various means of transportation and considering locker placement. In cities, these flexible regulations may increase accessibility and encourage creative last-mile solutions.
在最后一英里使用包裹寄存柜的行为意愿及其与出行方式选择的潜在联系
随着电子商务在全球范围内的扩张,使用包裹寄存柜变得越来越普遍。最终,我们的研究有助于更好地理解最后一英里的交付意图,为寻求鼓励储物柜使用的立法者和快递企业提供有见地的信息。在印度孟买完成一项在线调查后,使用潜在类聚类分析和结构方程模型来检验影响包裹储物柜用户使用的变量。这项研究的独特之处在于,它研究了三个群体:普通交通用户、私家车车主和拥有并使用两轮车的人,以探索交通方式选择与使用包裹寄存柜的意愿之间的关系。根据研究结果,感知有用性、感知易用性、感知风险和购物偏好是使用包裹储物柜行为意向的主要驱动因素。摩托车和自行车的车主在所有参数与他们使用包裹寄存柜的意愿之间表现出正相关关系,这表明便利性将导致他们使用这项服务。便利性与储物柜可达性的相关性显示在常规交通用户的感知有用性和态度之间的积极联系。相反,车主只表示与感知的易用性呈正相关,这表明他们使用包裹储物柜的倾向较低。这些结果强调了城市物流法规必须调整以适应新的交付模式,如包裹寄存柜,通过将服务提供与各种运输方式相匹配,并考虑寄存柜的位置。在城市,这些灵活的法规可能会增加可达性,并鼓励创造性的最后一英里解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Economics is a journal devoted to the dissemination of high quality economics research in the field of transportation. The content covers a wide variety of topics relating to the economics aspects of transportation, government regulatory policies regarding transportation, and issues of concern to transportation industry planners. The unifying theme throughout the papers is the application of economic theory and/or applied economic methodologies to transportation questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信