Estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with reduced data input using ensemble learning models in arid and humid regions of China

IF 7.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Qi Wei , Qi Wei , Junzeng Xu , Peng Chen , Shengyu Chen , Zihao Liu , Wenhao Qian , Zhiheng Huang , Jingyi Ren , Haoxuan Wang , Yimin Ding , Chao Lei , Zhiming Qi
{"title":"Estimating daily reference evapotranspiration with reduced data input using ensemble learning models in arid and humid regions of China","authors":"Qi Wei ,&nbsp;Qi Wei ,&nbsp;Junzeng Xu ,&nbsp;Peng Chen ,&nbsp;Shengyu Chen ,&nbsp;Zihao Liu ,&nbsp;Wenhao Qian ,&nbsp;Zhiheng Huang ,&nbsp;Jingyi Ren ,&nbsp;Haoxuan Wang ,&nbsp;Yimin Ding ,&nbsp;Chao Lei ,&nbsp;Zhiming Qi","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2025.110548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ET<sub>o</sub>) is key to irrigation system design and agricultural water management. Utilizing meteorological data (1960–2019) from 20 stations in China’s humid and arid regions, a reference ET<sub>o</sub> value was calculated using the FAO56-Penman-Monteith (PM) method. The accuracy of 6 ensemble learning models [<em>e.g</em>., Adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Categorical boosting (CatBoost), Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), Extra trees, and Light Gradient Boosting Method (LightGBM)] in estimating daily ET<sub>o</sub> using all available inputs was investigated. The performance of the best three models (CatBoost, GBDT and XGBoost) was then evaluated under 7 input combinations [<em>i.e</em>., complete and incomplete combinations of maximum and minimum temperature (T<sub>max</sub> and T<sub>min</sub>), relative humidity (RH), wind speed (U<sub>2</sub>), total and extra-terrestrial solar radiation (R<sub>s</sub> and R<sub>a</sub>)], and 4 dataset sizes (20, 30, 40 and 60 years). CatBoost showed the highest estimation accuracy (average R<sup>2</sup> = 0.93), stability, and robustness. Using incomplete combinations based on temperature and other indicators to estimate daily ET<sub>o</sub> also achieved satisfactory results (R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.91), and the key indicators contributing to a difference in ET<sub>o</sub> prediction accuracy between humid and arid regions were RH and R<sub>a</sub>. Different models’ accuracy in estimating daily ET<sub>o</sub> was not affected by dataset size (the difference of RMSE<0.025), but its stability improves with the increase of the dataset. This study evaluated the models’ performance under different data constraints and different regional applications, which provides a methodological reference for ET<sub>o</sub> simulation in global multiclimatic zones, takes into account accuracy and practicality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 110548"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169925006544","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is key to irrigation system design and agricultural water management. Utilizing meteorological data (1960–2019) from 20 stations in China’s humid and arid regions, a reference ETo value was calculated using the FAO56-Penman-Monteith (PM) method. The accuracy of 6 ensemble learning models [e.g., Adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Categorical boosting (CatBoost), Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), Extra trees, and Light Gradient Boosting Method (LightGBM)] in estimating daily ETo using all available inputs was investigated. The performance of the best three models (CatBoost, GBDT and XGBoost) was then evaluated under 7 input combinations [i.e., complete and incomplete combinations of maximum and minimum temperature (Tmax and Tmin), relative humidity (RH), wind speed (U2), total and extra-terrestrial solar radiation (Rs and Ra)], and 4 dataset sizes (20, 30, 40 and 60 years). CatBoost showed the highest estimation accuracy (average R2 = 0.93), stability, and robustness. Using incomplete combinations based on temperature and other indicators to estimate daily ETo also achieved satisfactory results (R2 > 0.91), and the key indicators contributing to a difference in ETo prediction accuracy between humid and arid regions were RH and Ra. Different models’ accuracy in estimating daily ETo was not affected by dataset size (the difference of RMSE<0.025), but its stability improves with the increase of the dataset. This study evaluated the models’ performance under different data constraints and different regional applications, which provides a methodological reference for ETo simulation in global multiclimatic zones, takes into account accuracy and practicality.
基于集成学习模型的中国干湿地区日参考蒸散量估算
准确估算参考蒸散量是灌溉系统设计和农业用水管理的关键。利用中国湿润和干旱区20个站点1960—2019年的气象资料,采用FAO56-Penman-Monteith (PM)方法计算了参考ETo值。研究了6种集成学习模型[例如:自适应增强(AdaBoost)、梯度增强决策树(GBDT)、分类增强(CatBoost)、极端梯度增强(XGBoost)、额外树和光梯度增强方法(LightGBM)]在使用所有可用输入估计每日ETo的准确性。然后,在7种输入组合(即最高和最低温度(Tmax和Tmin)、相对湿度(RH)、风速(U2)、总太阳辐射和地外太阳辐射(Rs和Ra)的完全和不完全组合)和4种数据集大小(20、30、40和60年)下,对最佳3种模型(CatBoost、GBDT和XGBoost)的性能进行了评估。CatBoost具有最高的估计精度(平均R2 = 0.93)、稳定性和鲁棒性。采用基于温度和其他指标的不完全组合来估算日ETo也取得了满意的结果(R2 >;0.91),而RH和Ra是影响干旱区与湿润区ETo预测精度差异的关键指标。不同模型对日ETo的估计精度不受数据集大小的影响(RMSE差值<0.025),但其稳定性随着数据集的增加而提高。本研究评估了模型在不同数据约束和不同区域应用下的性能,为全球多气候带ETo模拟提供了方法参考,同时兼顾了准确性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
800
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信