A phytogenic feed additive blend as a replacement for monensin in lactating Rahmani ewes' diets: Effects on feed utilization and milk production

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Hossam H. Azzaz , Noha A. Hassaan , Gouda A. Gouda , Yanting Chen , Ahmed E. Kholif
{"title":"A phytogenic feed additive blend as a replacement for monensin in lactating Rahmani ewes' diets: Effects on feed utilization and milk production","authors":"Hossam H. Azzaz ,&nbsp;Noha A. Hassaan ,&nbsp;Gouda A. Gouda ,&nbsp;Yanting Chen ,&nbsp;Ahmed E. Kholif","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluated the potential of phytogenic feed additives (PFAs) as a replacement for monensin in the diets of lactating Rahmani ewes. Two experiments were conducted using a completely randomized design. The first was an <em>in vitro</em> study that evaluated the effects of increasing doses (0, 0.3, 0.6, and 1 g/kg dry matter [DM]) of PFAs and monensin. The second experiment was an <em>in vivo</em> trial involving 30 lactating ewes (53 ± 0.5 kg body weight), all in their first week of lactation (1–7 days in milk). The ewes were randomly assigned to one of three dietary treatments: control, 0.3 g PFAs, or 0.3 g monensin/ kg DM diet, with 10 ewes per treatment, over a 60-day period. The doses for PFAs and monensin were selected based on the optimal results observed in the <em>in vitro</em> experiment. Before the 60-day experimental period, all ewes underwent a 14-day adaptation period to their respective diets. In the <em>in vitro</em> study, both PFAs and monensin significantly reduced gas and methane production (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), with the most substantial reductions observed at the 1 % inclusion level, decreasing by up to 17.6 % and 35.3 %, respectively. Digestibility of DM, organic matter (OM), and fiber improved at moderate inclusion levels (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) but declined at 1 %. Additionally, short-chain fatty acids were significantly reduced (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) with both additives. In the lactation experiment, supplementation improved nutrient digestibility, including DM, OM, crude protein, and fiber (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), with no differences between PFAs and monensin. Blood parameters such as total protein, albumin, glucose, and cholesterol were positively influenced (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), while blood urea nitrogen and liver enzymes decreased (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). Milk yield, energy output, and feed efficiency improved significantly (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), with no differences between the two supplements. The milk fatty acid profile showed reductions in total saturated fatty acids (SFA) and increases in unsaturated fatty acids (UFA), with a higher UFA:SFA ratio. Specific fatty acids, such as α-linolenic acid, increased significantly (<em>p</em> = 0.019). This study concludes that PFAs, at 0.3 g/kg, could effectively replace monensin to improve feed efficiency and lactational performance in Rahmani ewes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"326 ","pages":"Article 116397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125001920","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the potential of phytogenic feed additives (PFAs) as a replacement for monensin in the diets of lactating Rahmani ewes. Two experiments were conducted using a completely randomized design. The first was an in vitro study that evaluated the effects of increasing doses (0, 0.3, 0.6, and 1 g/kg dry matter [DM]) of PFAs and monensin. The second experiment was an in vivo trial involving 30 lactating ewes (53 ± 0.5 kg body weight), all in their first week of lactation (1–7 days in milk). The ewes were randomly assigned to one of three dietary treatments: control, 0.3 g PFAs, or 0.3 g monensin/ kg DM diet, with 10 ewes per treatment, over a 60-day period. The doses for PFAs and monensin were selected based on the optimal results observed in the in vitro experiment. Before the 60-day experimental period, all ewes underwent a 14-day adaptation period to their respective diets. In the in vitro study, both PFAs and monensin significantly reduced gas and methane production (p < 0.01), with the most substantial reductions observed at the 1 % inclusion level, decreasing by up to 17.6 % and 35.3 %, respectively. Digestibility of DM, organic matter (OM), and fiber improved at moderate inclusion levels (p < 0.01) but declined at 1 %. Additionally, short-chain fatty acids were significantly reduced (p < 0.01) with both additives. In the lactation experiment, supplementation improved nutrient digestibility, including DM, OM, crude protein, and fiber (p < 0.01), with no differences between PFAs and monensin. Blood parameters such as total protein, albumin, glucose, and cholesterol were positively influenced (p < 0.05), while blood urea nitrogen and liver enzymes decreased (p < 0.01). Milk yield, energy output, and feed efficiency improved significantly (p < 0.001), with no differences between the two supplements. The milk fatty acid profile showed reductions in total saturated fatty acids (SFA) and increases in unsaturated fatty acids (UFA), with a higher UFA:SFA ratio. Specific fatty acids, such as α-linolenic acid, increased significantly (p = 0.019). This study concludes that PFAs, at 0.3 g/kg, could effectively replace monensin to improve feed efficiency and lactational performance in Rahmani ewes.
一种替代莫能菌素的植物性混合饲料添加剂在哺乳期拉赫马尼母羊日粮中的应用:对饲料利用和产奶量的影响
本研究评估了植物性饲料添加剂(PFAs)在哺乳期拉赫马尼母羊日粮中替代莫能菌素的潜力。两个实验采用完全随机设计。第一项是体外研究,评估了增加PFAs和莫能菌素剂量(0、0.3、0.6和1 g/kg干物质[DM])的效果。实验二为体内试验,30只泌乳母羊(53 ± 0.5 kg体重)均在泌乳第一周(1-7天)。母羊被随机分配到三种饲粮处理中的一种:对照组、0.3 g PFAs或0.3 g莫能菌素/ kg DM饲粮,每个处理10只母羊,持续60天。根据体外实验的最佳结果选择PFAs和莫能菌素的剂量。在60 d的试验期之前,所有母羊对各自的饲粮进行了14 d的适应期。在体外研究中,PFAs和莫能菌素都显著降低了气体和甲烷的产量(p <; 0.01),在1 %的添加水平下,减少幅度最大,分别减少了17.6% %和35.3% %。中等包合水平下,干物质、有机质和纤维的消化率提高(p <; 0.01),但在1 %时下降。此外,两种添加剂显著降低了短链脂肪酸含量(p <; 0.01)。在泌乳试验中,饲粮中添加PFAs可提高饲粮中DM、OM、粗蛋白质和纤维的消化率(p <; 0.01),但PFAs与莫能菌素之间无显著差异。总蛋白、白蛋白、葡萄糖和胆固醇等血液参数受到积极影响(p <; 0.05),血尿素氮和肝酶降低(p <; 0.01)。产奶量、能量输出和饲料效率显著提高(p <; 0.001),两种添加物之间无差异。牛奶脂肪酸谱显示总饱和脂肪酸(SFA)减少,不饱和脂肪酸(UFA)增加,且UFA:SFA比值较高。α-亚麻酸等特定脂肪酸显著增加(p = 0.019)。综上所述,添加0.3 g/kg的PFAs可有效替代莫能菌素,提高拉赫马尼母羊的饲料效率和泌乳性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信