{"title":"The boreal soil microbiome of different urban green spaces – Do city residents meet different microbes?","authors":"Hannu Fritze , Krista Peltoniemi , Taina Pennanen , Sannakajsa Velmala , Jenni Hultman , Oili Tarvainen , Jouni Karhu , Marika Laurila , Leila Korpela , Katja Kangas","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soil microbes perform a wide range of functions, including nutrient cycling. Soils in urban green spaces also provide a nearby source of natural microbiota for human residents, potentially promoting the development of skin microbiomes and having beneficial impact on health. The soil of urban green spaces, which have distinctive vegetation characteristics, was analysed in two boreal cities to investigate whether residents are exposed to different microbial communities.</div><div>The analysis included built, open and forested green spaces. Built green spaces, characterized by flower beds and lawns, and open green spaces, such as meadows, had a similar soil microbiome, although this was an unexpected finding. The bacterial and fungal communities of urban forests differed from those of built and open green spaces. In contrast to the bacterial diversity of urban forests, which increased in the soil of built and open spaces, fungal diversity did not differ. According to metagenomic analyses all the green spaces were potentially denitrifying environments and revealed that all three urban spaces harboured genes that could possibly lead to the formation of more nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) in urban forest soils. This finding highlights the importance of incorporating greenhouse gas flux measurements and functional microbial analyses in future research on the impact of urbanization on soil microbiology.</div><div>From the perspective of urban planning, our results indicate that the soils of built green spaces are microbiologically diverse, offering the potential to design different types of plantations that attract residents to urban parks of their choice. Furthermore, we recommend making efforts to preserve existing urban forests to provide opportunities for local populations to interact with alternative environmental microbiomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 128870"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725002043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Soil microbes perform a wide range of functions, including nutrient cycling. Soils in urban green spaces also provide a nearby source of natural microbiota for human residents, potentially promoting the development of skin microbiomes and having beneficial impact on health. The soil of urban green spaces, which have distinctive vegetation characteristics, was analysed in two boreal cities to investigate whether residents are exposed to different microbial communities.
The analysis included built, open and forested green spaces. Built green spaces, characterized by flower beds and lawns, and open green spaces, such as meadows, had a similar soil microbiome, although this was an unexpected finding. The bacterial and fungal communities of urban forests differed from those of built and open green spaces. In contrast to the bacterial diversity of urban forests, which increased in the soil of built and open spaces, fungal diversity did not differ. According to metagenomic analyses all the green spaces were potentially denitrifying environments and revealed that all three urban spaces harboured genes that could possibly lead to the formation of more nitrous oxide (N2O) in urban forest soils. This finding highlights the importance of incorporating greenhouse gas flux measurements and functional microbial analyses in future research on the impact of urbanization on soil microbiology.
From the perspective of urban planning, our results indicate that the soils of built green spaces are microbiologically diverse, offering the potential to design different types of plantations that attract residents to urban parks of their choice. Furthermore, we recommend making efforts to preserve existing urban forests to provide opportunities for local populations to interact with alternative environmental microbiomes.
期刊介绍:
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects:
-Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology.
-Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation.
-Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments.
-Management of urban forests and other vegetation.
Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.