A quiet public? Procedural justice in Portuguese wind energy governance

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Flávio G. Oliveira, Inês Campos, Filipe Moreira Alves
{"title":"A quiet public? Procedural justice in Portuguese wind energy governance","authors":"Flávio G. Oliveira,&nbsp;Inês Campos,&nbsp;Filipe Moreira Alves","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Historically, wind energy has been central in studies on the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies within European countries, apart from Portugal. Public participation in wind energy developments in Portugal has been residual, resulting in a frequently unopposed deployment of wind energy in the country. In the context of the proliferation of new investments in wind energy expansion and ambitious future targets, this analysis takes stock of the Portuguese case study to enquire whether new developments led to a fairer public participation in wind energy, and what new civic participation dynamics are emerging. The approach comprises a review of existing literature, expert stakeholder interviews, and quantitative research on public consultations. Key findings reiterate that public participation for onshore wind has remained low through time, particularly when compared with solar power projects. Conversely, offshore wind has received more public opposition, especially from local fishing communities and environmental organizations. Higher levels of community participation for wind, and other renewable energy technologies such as solar, require more extensive policy changes, including community engagement measures, to achieve true distributive and procedural justice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 104147"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002282","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historically, wind energy has been central in studies on the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies within European countries, apart from Portugal. Public participation in wind energy developments in Portugal has been residual, resulting in a frequently unopposed deployment of wind energy in the country. In the context of the proliferation of new investments in wind energy expansion and ambitious future targets, this analysis takes stock of the Portuguese case study to enquire whether new developments led to a fairer public participation in wind energy, and what new civic participation dynamics are emerging. The approach comprises a review of existing literature, expert stakeholder interviews, and quantitative research on public consultations. Key findings reiterate that public participation for onshore wind has remained low through time, particularly when compared with solar power projects. Conversely, offshore wind has received more public opposition, especially from local fishing communities and environmental organizations. Higher levels of community participation for wind, and other renewable energy technologies such as solar, require more extensive policy changes, including community engagement measures, to achieve true distributive and procedural justice.
安静的公共场所?葡萄牙风能治理中的程序正义
从历史上看,风能一直是欧洲国家可再生能源技术社会接受度研究的中心,葡萄牙除外。在葡萄牙,公众对风能开发的参与一直很少,导致该国风能的部署经常是无人反对的。在风能扩张和雄心勃勃的未来目标的新投资激增的背景下,本分析对葡萄牙的案例研究进行了评估,以询问新的发展是否导致了更公平的公众参与风能,以及新的公民参与动力正在出现。该方法包括对现有文献的回顾,专家利益相关者访谈和公众咨询的定量研究。主要调查结果重申,陆上风电的公众参与度一直很低,特别是与太阳能发电项目相比。相反,海上风电受到了更多公众的反对,特别是来自当地渔业社区和环保组织。提高风能和太阳能等其他可再生能源技术的社区参与水平,需要更广泛的政策变革,包括社区参与措施,以实现真正的分配和程序公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信