Effect of 3-day linaclotide administration to reduce the PEG volume for colonoscopy bowel preparation: A multicenter, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial.
{"title":"Effect of 3-day linaclotide administration to reduce the PEG volume for colonoscopy bowel preparation: A multicenter, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Peng Pan,Huixin Chen,Tongchang Wang,Kaijun Liu,Biguang Tuo,Rong Wang,Hongyu Fu,Chunmeng Jiang,Lisha Chen,Qiu Zhao,Wen Wang,Weigang Chen,Qiang Guo,Weichang Chen,Yanqing Li,Zibin Tian,Zhijie Feng,Shaoqi Yang,Yi Fan,Fujuan Luan,Youxiang Chen,Zhaoshen Li,Yu Bai","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\r\nSeveral studies have investigated the role of linaclotide in bowel preparation; however, dosage and timing still warrant further exploration.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis non-inferiority randomized controlled study was performed in sixteen medical centers. The eligible subjects were randomly assigned to three groups: the Lct + 3 L PEG group (Group A), the 3 L PEG group (Group B), or the Lct + 2 L PEG group (Group C). The primary outcome was the adequate bowel preparation rate based on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Safety was assessed based on the incidence of adverse reactions.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 1607 eligible subjects were enrolled, and 1545 colonoscopy videos were uploaded. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the results of the non-inferiority test indicated that the adequate bowel preparation rate in Group C (87.58%, 95% CI: 85.08 to 90.62%) was neither inferior to that of Group A (88.79%, 95% CI: 86.11 to 91.46%) nor Group B (83.99%, 95% CI: 80.88 to 87.09%). The overall incidence of adverse reactions in Group A was higher than that in Group C (13.64% vs 8.19%, P = 0.012). There were no significant differences in polyp detection rate (P = 0.089), adenoma detection rate (P = 0.776), and bowel preparation completion rate (P = 0.052).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe adequate bowel preparation rate of the combination of 3-day linaclotide and 2 L PEG was neither inferior to the combination of 3-day linaclotide and 3 L PEG nor 3 L PEG alone in the average-risk population.","PeriodicalId":520099,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Several studies have investigated the role of linaclotide in bowel preparation; however, dosage and timing still warrant further exploration.
METHODS
This non-inferiority randomized controlled study was performed in sixteen medical centers. The eligible subjects were randomly assigned to three groups: the Lct + 3 L PEG group (Group A), the 3 L PEG group (Group B), or the Lct + 2 L PEG group (Group C). The primary outcome was the adequate bowel preparation rate based on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Safety was assessed based on the incidence of adverse reactions.
RESULTS
A total of 1607 eligible subjects were enrolled, and 1545 colonoscopy videos were uploaded. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the results of the non-inferiority test indicated that the adequate bowel preparation rate in Group C (87.58%, 95% CI: 85.08 to 90.62%) was neither inferior to that of Group A (88.79%, 95% CI: 86.11 to 91.46%) nor Group B (83.99%, 95% CI: 80.88 to 87.09%). The overall incidence of adverse reactions in Group A was higher than that in Group C (13.64% vs 8.19%, P = 0.012). There were no significant differences in polyp detection rate (P = 0.089), adenoma detection rate (P = 0.776), and bowel preparation completion rate (P = 0.052).
CONCLUSIONS
The adequate bowel preparation rate of the combination of 3-day linaclotide and 2 L PEG was neither inferior to the combination of 3-day linaclotide and 3 L PEG nor 3 L PEG alone in the average-risk population.