Effect of 3-day linaclotide administration to reduce the PEG volume for colonoscopy bowel preparation: A multicenter, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial.

Peng Pan,Huixin Chen,Tongchang Wang,Kaijun Liu,Biguang Tuo,Rong Wang,Hongyu Fu,Chunmeng Jiang,Lisha Chen,Qiu Zhao,Wen Wang,Weigang Chen,Qiang Guo,Weichang Chen,Yanqing Li,Zibin Tian,Zhijie Feng,Shaoqi Yang,Yi Fan,Fujuan Luan,Youxiang Chen,Zhaoshen Li,Yu Bai
{"title":"Effect of 3-day linaclotide administration to reduce the PEG volume for colonoscopy bowel preparation: A multicenter, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Peng Pan,Huixin Chen,Tongchang Wang,Kaijun Liu,Biguang Tuo,Rong Wang,Hongyu Fu,Chunmeng Jiang,Lisha Chen,Qiu Zhao,Wen Wang,Weigang Chen,Qiang Guo,Weichang Chen,Yanqing Li,Zibin Tian,Zhijie Feng,Shaoqi Yang,Yi Fan,Fujuan Luan,Youxiang Chen,Zhaoshen Li,Yu Bai","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\r\nSeveral studies have investigated the role of linaclotide in bowel preparation; however, dosage and timing still warrant further exploration.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis non-inferiority randomized controlled study was performed in sixteen medical centers. The eligible subjects were randomly assigned to three groups: the Lct + 3 L PEG group (Group A), the 3 L PEG group (Group B), or the Lct + 2 L PEG group (Group C). The primary outcome was the adequate bowel preparation rate based on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Safety was assessed based on the incidence of adverse reactions.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 1607 eligible subjects were enrolled, and 1545 colonoscopy videos were uploaded. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the results of the non-inferiority test indicated that the adequate bowel preparation rate in Group C (87.58%, 95% CI: 85.08 to 90.62%) was neither inferior to that of Group A (88.79%, 95% CI: 86.11 to 91.46%) nor Group B (83.99%, 95% CI: 80.88 to 87.09%). The overall incidence of adverse reactions in Group A was higher than that in Group C (13.64% vs 8.19%, P = 0.012). There were no significant differences in polyp detection rate (P = 0.089), adenoma detection rate (P = 0.776), and bowel preparation completion rate (P = 0.052).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe adequate bowel preparation rate of the combination of 3-day linaclotide and 2 L PEG was neither inferior to the combination of 3-day linaclotide and 3 L PEG nor 3 L PEG alone in the average-risk population.","PeriodicalId":520099,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Several studies have investigated the role of linaclotide in bowel preparation; however, dosage and timing still warrant further exploration. METHODS This non-inferiority randomized controlled study was performed in sixteen medical centers. The eligible subjects were randomly assigned to three groups: the Lct + 3 L PEG group (Group A), the 3 L PEG group (Group B), or the Lct + 2 L PEG group (Group C). The primary outcome was the adequate bowel preparation rate based on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Safety was assessed based on the incidence of adverse reactions. RESULTS A total of 1607 eligible subjects were enrolled, and 1545 colonoscopy videos were uploaded. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the results of the non-inferiority test indicated that the adequate bowel preparation rate in Group C (87.58%, 95% CI: 85.08 to 90.62%) was neither inferior to that of Group A (88.79%, 95% CI: 86.11 to 91.46%) nor Group B (83.99%, 95% CI: 80.88 to 87.09%). The overall incidence of adverse reactions in Group A was higher than that in Group C (13.64% vs 8.19%, P = 0.012). There were no significant differences in polyp detection rate (P = 0.089), adenoma detection rate (P = 0.776), and bowel preparation completion rate (P = 0.052). CONCLUSIONS The adequate bowel preparation rate of the combination of 3-day linaclotide and 2 L PEG was neither inferior to the combination of 3-day linaclotide and 3 L PEG nor 3 L PEG alone in the average-risk population.
利那洛肽给药3天对减少结肠镜肠道准备中PEG体积的影响:一项多中心、非劣效性、随机对照试验。
目的研究利那洛肽在肠道准备中的作用;然而,剂量和时机仍有待进一步探索。方法在16个医疗中心进行非劣效性随机对照研究。符合条件的受试者被随机分为三组:Lct + 3l PEG组(A组)、3l PEG组(B组)和Lct + 2l PEG组(C组)。主要结果是基于波士顿肠准备量表的适当肠准备率。安全性是根据不良反应的发生率来评估的。结果共纳入1607名符合条件的受试者,上传结肠镜检查视频1545段。意向治疗分析中,非劣效性试验结果显示,C组的肠道准备率(87.58%,95% CI: 85.08 ~ 90.62%)不低于A组(88.79%,95% CI: 86.11 ~ 91.46%)和B组(83.99%,95% CI: 80.88 ~ 87.09%)。A组总不良反应发生率高于C组(13.64% vs 8.19%, P = 0.012)。两组间息肉检出率(P = 0.089)、腺瘤检出率(P = 0.776)、肠准备完成率(P = 0.052)差异均无统计学意义。结论在平均危险人群中,3天利那洛肽联合2升聚乙二醇的肠准备率并不低于3天利那洛肽联合3升聚乙二醇或单独使用3升聚乙二醇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信