Hua Bao, Shanshan Yang, Xiaoxi Chen, Guangqiang Dong, Yuan Mao, Shuyu Wu, Xi Cheng, Xuxiaochen Wu, Wanxiangfu Tang, Min Wu, Shiting Tang, Wenhua Liang, Zheng Wang, Liu Yang, Jiaqi Liu, Tao Wang, Bingzhong Zhang, Kuirong Jiang, Qin Xu, Jierong Chen, Hairong Huang, Junjie Peng, Xiaomeng Xia, Yumei Wu, Shun Xu, Ji Tao, Li Chong, Dongqin Zhu, Ruowei Yang, Shuang Chang, Peng He, Xiuxiu Xu, JinPeng Zhang, Yi Shen, Ya Jiang, Sisi Liu, Xian Zhang, Xue Wu, Xiaonan Wang, Yang Shao
{"title":"Early detection of multiple cancer types using multidimensional cell-free DNA fragmentomics","authors":"Hua Bao, Shanshan Yang, Xiaoxi Chen, Guangqiang Dong, Yuan Mao, Shuyu Wu, Xi Cheng, Xuxiaochen Wu, Wanxiangfu Tang, Min Wu, Shiting Tang, Wenhua Liang, Zheng Wang, Liu Yang, Jiaqi Liu, Tao Wang, Bingzhong Zhang, Kuirong Jiang, Qin Xu, Jierong Chen, Hairong Huang, Junjie Peng, Xiaomeng Xia, Yumei Wu, Shun Xu, Ji Tao, Li Chong, Dongqin Zhu, Ruowei Yang, Shuang Chang, Peng He, Xiuxiu Xu, JinPeng Zhang, Yi Shen, Ya Jiang, Sisi Liu, Xian Zhang, Xue Wu, Xiaonan Wang, Yang Shao","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03735-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The multicancer early detection (MCED) test has the potential to enhance current cancer-screening methods. We evaluated a new MCED test that analyzes plasma cell-free DNA using genetic- and fragmentomics-based features from whole-genome sequencing. The present study included an internal validation cohort of 3,021 patients with cancer and 3,370 noncancer controls, and an independent cohort of 677 patients with cancer and 687 noncancer individuals. The results demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 87.4%, specificity of 97.8% and tissue-of-origin prediction accuracy of 82.4% in the independent validation cohort. Preliminary results from a prospective study of 3,724 asymptomatic participants showed a sensitivity of 53.5% (predominantly early stage cancers) and specificity of 98.1%. These findings indicate that the MCED test has strong potential to improve early cancer detection and support clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03735-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The multicancer early detection (MCED) test has the potential to enhance current cancer-screening methods. We evaluated a new MCED test that analyzes plasma cell-free DNA using genetic- and fragmentomics-based features from whole-genome sequencing. The present study included an internal validation cohort of 3,021 patients with cancer and 3,370 noncancer controls, and an independent cohort of 677 patients with cancer and 687 noncancer individuals. The results demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 87.4%, specificity of 97.8% and tissue-of-origin prediction accuracy of 82.4% in the independent validation cohort. Preliminary results from a prospective study of 3,724 asymptomatic participants showed a sensitivity of 53.5% (predominantly early stage cancers) and specificity of 98.1%. These findings indicate that the MCED test has strong potential to improve early cancer detection and support clinical decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.