{"title":"The comparison of fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser and focused ultrasound for vulvar lichen sclerosus: a retrospective study.","authors":"Maoyu Liu, Xuerui Zhang, Linlin Xiao, Jing Liang, Dan Cheng, Yue Zhu, Shufang Chang","doi":"10.1080/02656736.2025.2507958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the efficacy of fractional carbon dioxide laser (FxCO<sub>2</sub>) and focused ultrasound (FUS) in treating vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included biopsy-proven VLS patients who did not respond to first-line topical corticosteroids and were treated with FxCO<sub>2</sub> or FUS as an alternative between January 2020 and October 2022. The efficacy was evaluated using the Cattaneo score and clinical scoring system (CSS). A subgroup analysis was conducted to compare efficacy based on VLS severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 3-month follow-up, the total effective rates were similar between FxCO<sub>2</sub> (91.18%, 31/34) and FUS (88.57%, 31/35) (<i>p</i> > 0.05). At the 6-month follow-up, the total effective rates for FxCO<sub>2</sub> decreased to 85.29% (29/34), while FUS remained at 88.57% (31/35) (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Recurrence rates were 14.7% (5/34) for FxCO<sub>2</sub> and 11.4% (4/35) for FUS (<i>p</i> > 0.05) at the 6-month follow-up. Although there was no significant difference in total CSS scores and clinician-administered sign scores between FxCO<sub>2</sub> and FUS at both follow-ups (<i>p</i> > 0.05), FxCO<sub>2</sub> suggested superior patient-administered symptom improvement at 3-month (median: FxCO<sub>2</sub> 3 vs. FUS 5, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and 6-month follow-ups (median: FxCO<sub>2</sub> 3 vs. FUS 5, <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FxCO<sub>2</sub> and FUS show similar efficacy in treating VLS, with FxCO<sub>2</sub> suggesting a trend toward greater symptom relief. Further studies are needed to validate these preliminary observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520653,"journal":{"name":"International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group","volume":"42 1","pages":"2507958"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2025.2507958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of fractional carbon dioxide laser (FxCO2) and focused ultrasound (FUS) in treating vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS).
Methods: This single-center retrospective study included biopsy-proven VLS patients who did not respond to first-line topical corticosteroids and were treated with FxCO2 or FUS as an alternative between January 2020 and October 2022. The efficacy was evaluated using the Cattaneo score and clinical scoring system (CSS). A subgroup analysis was conducted to compare efficacy based on VLS severity.
Results: At the 3-month follow-up, the total effective rates were similar between FxCO2 (91.18%, 31/34) and FUS (88.57%, 31/35) (p > 0.05). At the 6-month follow-up, the total effective rates for FxCO2 decreased to 85.29% (29/34), while FUS remained at 88.57% (31/35) (p > 0.05). Recurrence rates were 14.7% (5/34) for FxCO2 and 11.4% (4/35) for FUS (p > 0.05) at the 6-month follow-up. Although there was no significant difference in total CSS scores and clinician-administered sign scores between FxCO2 and FUS at both follow-ups (p > 0.05), FxCO2 suggested superior patient-administered symptom improvement at 3-month (median: FxCO2 3 vs. FUS 5, p < 0.05) and 6-month follow-ups (median: FxCO2 3 vs. FUS 5, p < 0.01).
Conclusions: FxCO2 and FUS show similar efficacy in treating VLS, with FxCO2 suggesting a trend toward greater symptom relief. Further studies are needed to validate these preliminary observations.