Comparison of serratus plane and erector spinae plane blocks for postoperative analgesia in unilateral breast surgery.

K Şahin, C Sayman, S Kına, A Surhan Çınar
{"title":"Comparison of serratus plane and erector spinae plane blocks for postoperative analgesia in unilateral breast surgery.","authors":"K Şahin, C Sayman, S Kına, A Surhan Çınar","doi":"10.1016/j.redare.2025.501830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of interfascial plane blocks for postoperative analgesia is becoming more widespread because they are easier to perform and have fewer complications. This prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study compares the efficacy of serratus plane block (SPB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing unilateral breast surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-four ASA I-II patients aged 18-65 years who underwent elective unilateral breast surgery were included in the study. After exclusion, 70 patients were randomized to receive SPB (n=35) or ESPB (n=35). In both groups, nerve blocks were administered under ultrasound guidance with 25ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. Postoperative pain (assessed using the visual analogue scale [EVA]), duration of analgesia, tramadol consumption, and incidence of complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in EVA scores between groups. However, duration of analgesia was significantly higher in the ESPB group (395.6±141.9min) vs the SPB group (290.3±148.3min) (p=0.003). Total tramadol consumption over 24h was similar between groups: 70.9±48.6mg in the SPB group and 70.3±50.5mg in the ESPB group. Minimal postoperative complications, including nausea and vomiting, were noted with no significant difference between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both SPB and ESPB were safe and provided similar postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing unilateral breast surgery. ESPB provides longer lasting analgesia, and therefore improves patient comfort in the early postoperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":94196,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","volume":" ","pages":"501830"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2025.501830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The use of interfascial plane blocks for postoperative analgesia is becoming more widespread because they are easier to perform and have fewer complications. This prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study compares the efficacy of serratus plane block (SPB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing unilateral breast surgery.

Methods: Seventy-four ASA I-II patients aged 18-65 years who underwent elective unilateral breast surgery were included in the study. After exclusion, 70 patients were randomized to receive SPB (n=35) or ESPB (n=35). In both groups, nerve blocks were administered under ultrasound guidance with 25ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. Postoperative pain (assessed using the visual analogue scale [EVA]), duration of analgesia, tramadol consumption, and incidence of complications were recorded.

Results: There were no significant differences in EVA scores between groups. However, duration of analgesia was significantly higher in the ESPB group (395.6±141.9min) vs the SPB group (290.3±148.3min) (p=0.003). Total tramadol consumption over 24h was similar between groups: 70.9±48.6mg in the SPB group and 70.3±50.5mg in the ESPB group. Minimal postoperative complications, including nausea and vomiting, were noted with no significant difference between groups.

Conclusion: Both SPB and ESPB were safe and provided similar postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing unilateral breast surgery. ESPB provides longer lasting analgesia, and therefore improves patient comfort in the early postoperative period.

单侧乳房手术后锯肌平面与竖脊肌平面阻滞镇痛的比较。
目的:由于筋膜间平面阻滞术操作简单、并发症少,其在术后镇痛中的应用越来越广泛。这项前瞻性、单盲、随机对照研究比较了锯肌平面阻滞(SPB)和竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)对单侧乳房手术患者术后镇痛的疗效。方法:74例ASA I-II型患者,年龄18-65岁,接受选择性单侧乳房手术。排除后,70例患者随机接受SPB (n = 35)或ESPB (n = 35)。两组患者均在超声引导下应用25 mL 0.25%布比卡因进行神经阻滞。记录术后疼痛(采用视觉模拟量表[EVA]评估)、镇痛持续时间、曲马多用量及并发症发生率。结果:两组患者EVA评分差异无统计学意义。然而,ESPB组的镇痛时间(395.6±141.9分钟)明显高于SPB组(290.3±148.3分钟)(p = 0.003)。两组间24小时曲马多总消耗量相似:SPB组为70.9±48.6 mg, ESPB组为70.3±50.5 mg。最小的术后并发症,包括恶心和呕吐,组间无显著差异。结论:SPB和ESPB对单侧乳房手术患者的术后镇痛效果相似,安全可靠。ESPB提供更持久的镇痛,因此提高了术后早期患者的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信