Endovascular stenting for extracranial internal carotid artery dissection - single-centre experience and literature overview.

Polish journal of radiology Pub Date : 2025-04-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pjr/202103
Paweł Szmygin, Maciej Szmygin, Tomasz Roman, Piotr Luchowski, Tomasz Jargiełło, Radosław Rola
{"title":"Endovascular stenting for extracranial internal carotid artery dissection - single-centre experience and literature overview.","authors":"Paweł Szmygin, Maciej Szmygin, Tomasz Roman, Piotr Luchowski, Tomasz Jargiełło, Radosław Rola","doi":"10.5114/pjr/202103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Extracranial internal carotid artery dissections (EICAD) remain a relatively common cause of ischaemic events in young patients. Currently, there is no consensus on standardised use of endovascular therapy in the treatment of these patients, but available data suggest that conservative treatment is not sufficient in 15% of cases. The aim of our study was to evaluate if endovascular stent placement was safe and effective for the treatment of extracranial internal carotid artery dissection, and whether it should be considered in properly selected patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This single-centre, retrospective study aimed to evaluate procedural and clinical outcomes of patients with EICAD who underwent endovascular stenting between 2015 and 2024. Procedural and clinical efficacy and safety, the rate of complications, and long-term outcomes were noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 patients (10 females) with an average age of 53 years underwent stenting for EICAD. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Perioperative complications were noted in 2 cases. Neurological evaluation performed at 6-month follow-up showed very good clinical results in the majority of cases (mRS 0 and mRS 1 were 76% and 19%, respectively). Control imaging examinations confirmed stent patency in all cases. No long-term mortality was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This retrospective study demonstrated procedural and clinical safety and efficacy of endovascular stenting in patients with extracranial internal carotid artery dissection. That is why endovascular therapy should be proposed to individuals with unsatisfactory response to medical treatment and in cases of disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":94174,"journal":{"name":"Polish journal of radiology","volume":"90 ","pages":"e191-e197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr/202103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Extracranial internal carotid artery dissections (EICAD) remain a relatively common cause of ischaemic events in young patients. Currently, there is no consensus on standardised use of endovascular therapy in the treatment of these patients, but available data suggest that conservative treatment is not sufficient in 15% of cases. The aim of our study was to evaluate if endovascular stent placement was safe and effective for the treatment of extracranial internal carotid artery dissection, and whether it should be considered in properly selected patients.

Material and methods: This single-centre, retrospective study aimed to evaluate procedural and clinical outcomes of patients with EICAD who underwent endovascular stenting between 2015 and 2024. Procedural and clinical efficacy and safety, the rate of complications, and long-term outcomes were noted.

Results: A total of 21 patients (10 females) with an average age of 53 years underwent stenting for EICAD. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Perioperative complications were noted in 2 cases. Neurological evaluation performed at 6-month follow-up showed very good clinical results in the majority of cases (mRS 0 and mRS 1 were 76% and 19%, respectively). Control imaging examinations confirmed stent patency in all cases. No long-term mortality was observed.

Conclusions: This retrospective study demonstrated procedural and clinical safety and efficacy of endovascular stenting in patients with extracranial internal carotid artery dissection. That is why endovascular therapy should be proposed to individuals with unsatisfactory response to medical treatment and in cases of disease progression.

颅内外颈内动脉夹层血管内支架置入术-单中心经验和文献综述。
目的:颅外颈内动脉夹层(EICAD)仍然是年轻患者缺血性事件的一个相对常见的原因。目前,在这些患者的治疗中,对血管内治疗的标准化使用尚未达成共识,但现有数据表明,在15%的病例中,保守治疗是不够的。我们的研究目的是评估血管内支架置入术治疗颅外颈内动脉夹层是否安全有效,以及在适当选择患者时是否应该考虑。材料和方法:这项单中心、回顾性研究旨在评估2015年至2024年间接受血管内支架植入术的EICAD患者的手术和临床结果。观察了手术和临床的有效性和安全性、并发症发生率和长期预后。结果:共有21例患者(10例女性)接受了EICAD支架置入,平均年龄53岁。在所有情况下都取得了技术上的成功。2例出现围手术期并发症。6个月随访时进行的神经学评估显示,大多数病例的临床结果非常好(mRS 0和mRS 1分别为76%和19%)。对照影像学检查均证实支架通畅。未观察到长期死亡率。结论:本回顾性研究证实了颅内外颈内动脉夹层患者血管内支架植入术的程序和临床安全性和有效性。这就是为什么血管内治疗应该建议对药物治疗反应不满意的个体和疾病进展的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信