A comparative study on the consistency of different decision support software systems from the perspective of potential drug-drug interactions in intensive care unit patients.

Furong Han, Xiao Cheng, Yiman Li, Jie Bai, Liming Dong, Jiawei Wang
{"title":"A comparative study on the consistency of different decision support software systems from the perspective of potential drug-drug interactions in intensive care unit patients.","authors":"Furong Han, Xiao Cheng, Yiman Li, Jie Bai, Liming Dong, Jiawei Wang","doi":"10.1080/17425255.2025.2511961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In intensive care units (ICU), the issue of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is becoming increasingly prominent, and these interactions can lead to adverse drug reactions, therapeutic failure, or altered drug efficacy. This study aimed to assess the frequency and attributes of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) and the consistency of different decision support software in ICU patients.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. The consistency of different decision support software was assessed using the Kendall W coefficient, Cohen's kappa, Cronbach's Alpha, Fleiss Kappa, Intraclass correlation coefficient and Gwet's AC1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 897 prescriptions from 290 patients were evaluated. The total number of pDDIs identified varied significantly across platforms, ranging from 134 to 213. Inter-platform agreement on severity classification was poor (Gwet's AC1 = 0.32, ICC = 0.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This observational investigation revealed marked variability across clinical decision platforms regarding both quantitative and qualitative aspects of pDDIs identification in critical care populations, underscoring the imperative to establish unified protocols for pDDIs classification and implement dynamic DDI database maintenance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94005,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"865-873"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2025.2511961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In intensive care units (ICU), the issue of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is becoming increasingly prominent, and these interactions can lead to adverse drug reactions, therapeutic failure, or altered drug efficacy. This study aimed to assess the frequency and attributes of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) and the consistency of different decision support software in ICU patients.

Research design and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. The consistency of different decision support software was assessed using the Kendall W coefficient, Cohen's kappa, Cronbach's Alpha, Fleiss Kappa, Intraclass correlation coefficient and Gwet's AC1.

Results: A total of 897 prescriptions from 290 patients were evaluated. The total number of pDDIs identified varied significantly across platforms, ranging from 134 to 213. Inter-platform agreement on severity classification was poor (Gwet's AC1 = 0.32, ICC = 0.41).

Conclusions: This observational investigation revealed marked variability across clinical decision platforms regarding both quantitative and qualitative aspects of pDDIs identification in critical care populations, underscoring the imperative to establish unified protocols for pDDIs classification and implement dynamic DDI database maintenance.

重症监护病房患者药物-药物潜在相互作用视角下不同决策支持软件系统一致性比较研究
背景:在重症监护病房(ICU),药物-药物相互作用(ddi)的问题变得越来越突出,这些相互作用可能导致药物不良反应、治疗失败或药物疗效改变。本研究旨在评估ICU患者潜在药物相互作用(pddi)的频率和属性,以及不同决策支持软件的一致性。研究设计与方法:在某三级医院进行横断面研究。采用Kendall W系数、Cohen’s kappa、Cronbach’s Alpha、Fleiss kappa、class内相关系数和Gwet’s AC1对不同决策支持软件的一致性进行评价。结果:共评价290例患者897张处方。不同平台的pddi总数差异很大,从134到213不等。平台间对严重性分类的一致性较差(Gwet的AC1 = 0.32, ICC = 0.41)。结论:这项观察性调查揭示了临床决策平台在重症监护人群中pddi识别的定量和定性方面的显著差异,强调了建立统一的pddi分类协议和实施动态DDI数据库维护的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信