Neural Response to Reward and Loss Following Basic Combat Training.

Clara Freeman, Eric Rawls, Collin D Teich, Scott R Sponheim, Melissa A Polusny, Craig Marquardt
{"title":"Neural Response to Reward and Loss Following Basic Combat Training.","authors":"Clara Freeman, Eric Rawls, Collin D Teich, Scott R Sponheim, Melissa A Polusny, Craig Marquardt","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The brain's responsiveness to rewarding stimuli is essential for adaptive functioning while deficits in neural reward processing have been linked to the transdiagnostic symptom of anhedonia. Acute or prolonged stressors may negatively impact neural reward responses; however, few studies have examined if real-world naturalistic stressors prospectively predict reductions in brain responses to rewards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pre-registered analysis (https://osf.io/f6e8w) used data from the ARMOR study to assess whether exposure to basic combat training (BCT), a demanding and stress-inducing 10-week program, led to reductions in electrophysiological measures of reward response. One hundred sixteen military recruits completed a virtual gambling task while electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded before and after BCT. Mean EEG activity in the time window of the Reward Positivity (RewP; 175 - 325ms post-feedback at FCz) was averaged separately for the gain and loss condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that neural response to both gain and loss feedback in the time-window of the RewP significantly decreased from baseline following BCT (b = -0.67, p <.001), but the difference between conditions did not (b = 0.28, p = .23). Greater reports of BCT-related stressors predicted decreased neural response to gain, but not loss. Finally, baseline reward-related power in the delta-band frequency prospectively predicted less self-reported BCT-related stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that experiencing the stress of BCT is associated with reductions in neural processing of both reward and loss feedback. Further, those with greater reward-related delta oscillatory activity may perceive less negative impact of real-world stressors.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.05.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The brain's responsiveness to rewarding stimuli is essential for adaptive functioning while deficits in neural reward processing have been linked to the transdiagnostic symptom of anhedonia. Acute or prolonged stressors may negatively impact neural reward responses; however, few studies have examined if real-world naturalistic stressors prospectively predict reductions in brain responses to rewards.

Methods: This pre-registered analysis (https://osf.io/f6e8w) used data from the ARMOR study to assess whether exposure to basic combat training (BCT), a demanding and stress-inducing 10-week program, led to reductions in electrophysiological measures of reward response. One hundred sixteen military recruits completed a virtual gambling task while electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded before and after BCT. Mean EEG activity in the time window of the Reward Positivity (RewP; 175 - 325ms post-feedback at FCz) was averaged separately for the gain and loss condition.

Results: We found that neural response to both gain and loss feedback in the time-window of the RewP significantly decreased from baseline following BCT (b = -0.67, p <.001), but the difference between conditions did not (b = 0.28, p = .23). Greater reports of BCT-related stressors predicted decreased neural response to gain, but not loss. Finally, baseline reward-related power in the delta-band frequency prospectively predicted less self-reported BCT-related stress.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that experiencing the stress of BCT is associated with reductions in neural processing of both reward and loss feedback. Further, those with greater reward-related delta oscillatory activity may perceive less negative impact of real-world stressors.

基础战斗训练后对奖励和损失的神经反应。
背景:大脑对奖励刺激的反应对适应性功能至关重要,而神经奖励处理的缺陷与快感缺乏的诊断症状有关。急性或长期的压力源可能对神经奖赏反应产生负面影响;然而,很少有研究调查现实世界的自然压力源是否能预测大脑对奖励的反应减少。方法:这项预先注册的分析(https://osf.io/f6e8w)使用ARMOR研究的数据来评估是否暴露于基本战斗训练(BCT),一个高要求和压力诱导的10周计划,导致电生理测量奖励反应的减少。116名新兵完成虚拟赌博任务后,记录了BCT前后的脑电图(EEG)。奖励积极性时间窗内的平均脑电活动(RewP;175 - 325ms后反馈在FCz)分别平均增益和损失条件。结果:我们发现,在BCT后,RewP时间窗口内对获得和损失反馈的神经反应明显低于基线(b = -0.67, p)。结论:这些发现表明,经历BCT的压力与神经处理奖励和损失反馈的减少有关。此外,那些与奖励相关的δ振荡活动更大的人可能会感受到较少的现实世界压力源的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信