Unlocking the potential of embryos: insight of systematic review and meta-analysis into laser-assisted hatching's role in conquering recurrent implantation failure.

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in reproductive health Pub Date : 2025-05-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frph.2025.1581529
Tingting Du, Yang Ma, Zanche Huang, Xiaoxuan Zhao, Qin Zhang, Ning Ren
{"title":"Unlocking the potential of embryos: insight of systematic review and meta-analysis into laser-assisted hatching's role in conquering recurrent implantation failure.","authors":"Tingting Du, Yang Ma, Zanche Huang, Xiaoxuan Zhao, Qin Zhang, Ning Ren","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1581529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The journey of assisted reproductive technology (ART) for couples facing recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is fraught with emotional and physical challenges. RIF, often characterized by the failure of high-quality embryos to implant after multiple ART cycles, has directed attention towards interventions like laser-assisted hatching (LAH). However, discrepancies in the literature necessitate a comprehensive review of LAH's efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Following a thorough search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases up to November 2023, retrospective studies or RCT were considered for inclusion. Summary effect sizes [odds ratio (OR) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI)] were calculated for each outcome.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusion: </strong>Eight studies comprising 2,634 patients were included. LAH significantly improved implantation rates (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.05-1.51). Clinical pregnancy rates increased in patients who had fresh embryos transferred (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.05-1.58). Notably, LAH was associated with higher miscarriage rates in frozen embryo transfers (OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.04-2.02). No significant increase in ectopic or multiple pregnancy rates was observed. For patients with RIF, especially older women, LAH presents a potential avenue to improve implantation. Its impact on clinical pregnancy rates is less substantial. However, its impact on final live birth rates and the increased miscarriage risk in frozen transfers necessitate a cautious and individualized approach. The technique's safety, while generally upheld, requires careful application and consideration of the specific challenges RIF patients face. <b>Systematic Review Registration:</b> https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024497329, PROSPERO (CRD42024497329).</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1581529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12098289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2025.1581529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The journey of assisted reproductive technology (ART) for couples facing recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is fraught with emotional and physical challenges. RIF, often characterized by the failure of high-quality embryos to implant after multiple ART cycles, has directed attention towards interventions like laser-assisted hatching (LAH). However, discrepancies in the literature necessitate a comprehensive review of LAH's efficacy and safety.

Materials and methods: Following a thorough search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases up to November 2023, retrospective studies or RCT were considered for inclusion. Summary effect sizes [odds ratio (OR) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI)] were calculated for each outcome.

Results and conclusion: Eight studies comprising 2,634 patients were included. LAH significantly improved implantation rates (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.05-1.51). Clinical pregnancy rates increased in patients who had fresh embryos transferred (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.05-1.58). Notably, LAH was associated with higher miscarriage rates in frozen embryo transfers (OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.04-2.02). No significant increase in ectopic or multiple pregnancy rates was observed. For patients with RIF, especially older women, LAH presents a potential avenue to improve implantation. Its impact on clinical pregnancy rates is less substantial. However, its impact on final live birth rates and the increased miscarriage risk in frozen transfers necessitate a cautious and individualized approach. The technique's safety, while generally upheld, requires careful application and consideration of the specific challenges RIF patients face. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024497329, PROSPERO (CRD42024497329).

解锁胚胎的潜力:激光辅助孵化在克服复发性植入失败中的作用的系统回顾和荟萃分析的见解。
辅助生殖技术(ART)对于面临复发性植入失败(RIF)的夫妇来说充满了情感和身体上的挑战。RIF的特征通常是在多个抗逆转录病毒治疗周期后高质量胚胎无法植入,它已引起人们对激光辅助孵化(LAH)等干预措施的关注。然而,文献中的差异需要对LAH的有效性和安全性进行全面的审查。材料和方法:通过对PubMed、Embase、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库的全面检索,截止到2023年11月,我们考虑纳入回顾性研究或RCT。计算每个结果的总效应大小[比值比(OR)或95%可信区间(CI)的风险比(RR)]。结果与结论:纳入8项研究,包括2,634例患者。LAH显著提高着床率(OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.05-1.51)。移植新鲜胚胎的患者临床妊娠率增加(OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.05-1.58)。值得注意的是,在冷冻胚胎移植中,LAH与较高的流产率相关(OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.04-2.02)。未观察到异位妊娠或多胎妊娠率显著增加。对于RIF患者,特别是老年妇女,LAH提供了改善植入的潜在途径。它对临床妊娠率的影响不太大。然而,它对最终活产率的影响和冷冻移植中流产风险的增加需要谨慎和个性化的方法。该技术的安全性虽然得到普遍支持,但需要仔细应用并考虑RIF患者面临的具体挑战。系统评价注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024497329, PROSPERO (CRD42024497329)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信