Enhancing the Diagnostic Yield of EGD for Diagnosis of Barrett Esophagus Through Methylated DNA Biomarker Triage.

Q2 Medicine
Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-04-01
Jayde E Kurland, Sheena B Patel, Richard Englehardt, Seper Dezfoli, Daniel M Tseng, Michael W Foutz, Paul S Bradley, Badi Eghterafi, Victoria T Lee, Suman Verma, Brian J deGuzman, Lishan Aklog
{"title":"Enhancing the Diagnostic Yield of EGD for Diagnosis of Barrett Esophagus Through Methylated DNA Biomarker Triage.","authors":"Jayde E Kurland, Sheena B Patel, Richard Englehardt, Seper Dezfoli, Daniel M Tseng, Michael W Foutz, Paul S Bradley, Badi Eghterafi, Victoria T Lee, Suman Verma, Brian J deGuzman, Lishan Aklog","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>EsoGuard (EG) is a methylated DNA assay for cells collected nonendoscopically with EsoCheck for detection of Barrett esophagus (BE) and can be utilized as a triage to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in patients meeting clinical criteria for BE screening. EG triage may enrich the population undergoing EGD, increasing BE diagnosis without overburdening endoscopy resources.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To test the hypothesis that EGDs performed on patients who test positive on EG have higher diagnostic yields than screening EGDs alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected real-world retrospective data from EG-positive patients for whom EGD diagnoses were available. The diagnostic yield of these EGDs was measured by the BE detection rate. The yield of screening EGDs was estimated by literature-established disease prevalence (10.6%). The hypothesis was tested using t-test for single proportions at a one-sided 5% significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 209 patients, 60 (28.7%) had specialized intestinal metaplasia but 10 (4.8%) had less than 1 cm of nondysplastic disease. Because the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) definition of BE requires disease length of at least 1 cm, these patients were excluded from analysis. In the analyzed population, we observed a 2.4-fold increase in BE detection compared with the 10.6% performance goal. There was a 2.7-fold increase in the cohort meeting ACG screening criteria and a 2.5-fold increase among those meeting ACG criteria who were aged 65 years and older.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EG triage enriches the population undergoing EGD for BE detection. Compared with screening EGD alone, it improves diagnostic yield. This may help direct more efficient use of endoscopy resources to improve disease detection in at-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":52498,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":"21 4","pages":"210-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: EsoGuard (EG) is a methylated DNA assay for cells collected nonendoscopically with EsoCheck for detection of Barrett esophagus (BE) and can be utilized as a triage to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in patients meeting clinical criteria for BE screening. EG triage may enrich the population undergoing EGD, increasing BE diagnosis without overburdening endoscopy resources.

Aim: To test the hypothesis that EGDs performed on patients who test positive on EG have higher diagnostic yields than screening EGDs alone.

Methods: We collected real-world retrospective data from EG-positive patients for whom EGD diagnoses were available. The diagnostic yield of these EGDs was measured by the BE detection rate. The yield of screening EGDs was estimated by literature-established disease prevalence (10.6%). The hypothesis was tested using t-test for single proportions at a one-sided 5% significance level.

Results: Among 209 patients, 60 (28.7%) had specialized intestinal metaplasia but 10 (4.8%) had less than 1 cm of nondysplastic disease. Because the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) definition of BE requires disease length of at least 1 cm, these patients were excluded from analysis. In the analyzed population, we observed a 2.4-fold increase in BE detection compared with the 10.6% performance goal. There was a 2.7-fold increase in the cohort meeting ACG screening criteria and a 2.5-fold increase among those meeting ACG criteria who were aged 65 years and older.

Conclusion: EG triage enriches the population undergoing EGD for BE detection. Compared with screening EGD alone, it improves diagnostic yield. This may help direct more efficient use of endoscopy resources to improve disease detection in at-risk patients.

甲基化DNA生物标志物分类提高EGD诊断Barrett食管的诊断率。
背景:EsoGuard (EG)是一种甲基化DNA检测方法,用于非内镜下用EsoCheck收集的细胞,用于检测巴雷特食管(BE),可用于在符合BE筛查临床标准的患者中进行食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)的分类。EG分类可以丰富接受EGD的人群,增加BE诊断,而不增加内窥镜检查资源的负担。目的:验证对EG检测呈阳性的患者进行egd筛查比单独筛查egd具有更高诊断率的假设。方法:我们收集了真实世界的回顾性数据,这些数据来自可诊断为EGD的EGD阳性患者。这些EGDs的诊断率是通过BE的检出率来衡量的。筛选EGDs的产率由文献确定的疾病患病率估算(10.6%)。假设采用单侧5%显著性水平的单比例t检验。结果:209例患者中,60例(28.7%)为特征性肠化生,10例(4.8%)为小于1 cm的非发育不良。由于美国胃肠病学学会(ACG)对BE的定义要求疾病长度至少为1cm,因此这些患者被排除在分析之外。在分析的人群中,我们观察到与10.6%的性能目标相比,BE检测增加了2.4倍。在符合ACG筛查标准的队列中增加了2.7倍,在符合ACG筛查标准的65岁及以上人群中增加了2.5倍。结论:eeg分诊丰富了接受EGD的人群对BE的检测。与单纯筛查EGD相比,提高了诊断率。这可能有助于指导更有效地利用内窥镜资源,以提高对高危患者的疾病检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Gastroenterology and Hepatology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信