Modifiable determinants of older adults' physical activity and sedentary behavior in community and healthcare settings: a DE-PASS systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.7 1区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Simone Ciaccioni, Sofie Compernolle, Maren Lerfald, Federico Palumbo, Floriana Fadda, Ginevra Toma, Selcuk Akpinar, Katja Borodulin, Emine Caglar, Greet Cardon, Murat Cenk Celen, Joanna Cieślińska-Świder, Cristina Cortis, Andrea Di Credico, Murat Emirzeoğlu, Andrea Fusco, Daniel Gallardo Gómez, Linn Marita Hagen, Ayda Karaca, Mohammed Khudair, Marianna De Maio, Paul Jarle Mork, Livia Oddi, Kandianos Emmanouil Sakalidis, Petru Sandu, Sevil Turhan, Wei Wang, Melda Pelin Yargıç, Ekaterina Zotcheva, Laura Capranica, Ciaran MacDonncha, Linda Ernstsen
{"title":"Modifiable determinants of older adults' physical activity and sedentary behavior in community and healthcare settings: a DE-PASS systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Simone Ciaccioni, Sofie Compernolle, Maren Lerfald, Federico Palumbo, Floriana Fadda, Ginevra Toma, Selcuk Akpinar, Katja Borodulin, Emine Caglar, Greet Cardon, Murat Cenk Celen, Joanna Cieślińska-Świder, Cristina Cortis, Andrea Di Credico, Murat Emirzeoğlu, Andrea Fusco, Daniel Gallardo Gómez, Linn Marita Hagen, Ayda Karaca, Mohammed Khudair, Marianna De Maio, Paul Jarle Mork, Livia Oddi, Kandianos Emmanouil Sakalidis, Petru Sandu, Sevil Turhan, Wei Wang, Melda Pelin Yargıç, Ekaterina Zotcheva, Laura Capranica, Ciaran MacDonncha, Linda Ernstsen","doi":"10.1186/s11556-025-00373-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify the modifiable determinants targeted in interventions involving older adults, and to determine which of these interventions effectively increased physical activity (PA) and/or reduced sedentary behaviour (SB). Additionally, to explore whether the effects of these interventions vary based on the implementation setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled trials (CTs) was performed in Medline, APA PsycArticles, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science. Risk of bias assessment was performed with Cochrane's tool. Modifiable determinants were narratively synthesized, and random-effects models were performed to meta-analyse studies reporting device-measured physical activity or sedentary behaviour. Moderator analyses were performed to investigate the role of implementation setting. Standardized between-group mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to indicate effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 31,727 individual records, 52 eligible studies published between 2012-2022 were identified, 30 and 22 studies from community and health care settings, respectively. Determinants within the category physical health and wellbeing (n = 23) were most frequently reported while only one study reported determinants within a social or cultural context. Eighteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Interventions targeting physical health and wellbeing revealed an increase in steps (SMD = 0.46; 95%CI: 0.15 to 0.77) and minutes of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (SMD = 0.41; 95%CI: 0.19 to 0.64) among intervention participants compared to controls, whereas interventions targeting psychological or behavioural determinants showed no between-group differences in steps (SMD = 0.10; 95%CI: -0.12 to 0.32) and moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (SMD = 0.26; 95%CI: -0.24 to -0.75). Interventions targeting physical health and wellbeing showed significant heterogeneity (p < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 73.10%). Subgroup analyses showed a significant effect on device-measured physical activity for the eight community-based interventions (SMD = 0.42; 95%CI: 0.07 to 0.77), while no significant effect was found for the eight studies performed in healthcare settings (SMD = 0.26; 95%CI; -0.10 to 0.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interventions targeting physical health and wellbeing may increase PA in older adults, with community-based studies appearing more effective than studies in healthcare settings. The significant heterogeneity of study findings indicates that further research is needed to fully understand the influence of PA and SB determinants across settings, particularly those related to psychological, behavioural, social, and cultural factors.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO: CRD42022287606.</p>","PeriodicalId":50477,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":"22 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-025-00373-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the modifiable determinants targeted in interventions involving older adults, and to determine which of these interventions effectively increased physical activity (PA) and/or reduced sedentary behaviour (SB). Additionally, to explore whether the effects of these interventions vary based on the implementation setting.

Methods: A search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled trials (CTs) was performed in Medline, APA PsycArticles, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science. Risk of bias assessment was performed with Cochrane's tool. Modifiable determinants were narratively synthesized, and random-effects models were performed to meta-analyse studies reporting device-measured physical activity or sedentary behaviour. Moderator analyses were performed to investigate the role of implementation setting. Standardized between-group mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to indicate effect sizes.

Results: From 31,727 individual records, 52 eligible studies published between 2012-2022 were identified, 30 and 22 studies from community and health care settings, respectively. Determinants within the category physical health and wellbeing (n = 23) were most frequently reported while only one study reported determinants within a social or cultural context. Eighteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Interventions targeting physical health and wellbeing revealed an increase in steps (SMD = 0.46; 95%CI: 0.15 to 0.77) and minutes of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (SMD = 0.41; 95%CI: 0.19 to 0.64) among intervention participants compared to controls, whereas interventions targeting psychological or behavioural determinants showed no between-group differences in steps (SMD = 0.10; 95%CI: -0.12 to 0.32) and moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (SMD = 0.26; 95%CI: -0.24 to -0.75). Interventions targeting physical health and wellbeing showed significant heterogeneity (p < 0.0001; I2 = 73.10%). Subgroup analyses showed a significant effect on device-measured physical activity for the eight community-based interventions (SMD = 0.42; 95%CI: 0.07 to 0.77), while no significant effect was found for the eight studies performed in healthcare settings (SMD = 0.26; 95%CI; -0.10 to 0.62).

Conclusion: Interventions targeting physical health and wellbeing may increase PA in older adults, with community-based studies appearing more effective than studies in healthcare settings. The significant heterogeneity of study findings indicates that further research is needed to fully understand the influence of PA and SB determinants across settings, particularly those related to psychological, behavioural, social, and cultural factors.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO: CRD42022287606.

社区和医疗机构中老年人身体活动和久坐行为的可改变决定因素:DE-PASS系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:确定针对老年人的干预措施中可改变的决定因素,并确定哪些干预措施有效地增加了身体活动(PA)和/或减少了久坐行为(SB)。此外,探讨这些干预措施的效果是否因实施环境而异。方法:检索Medline、APA PsycArticles、SPORTDiscus和Web of Science上的随机对照试验(RCTs)和对照试验(CTs)。采用Cochrane工具进行偏倚风险评估。对可改变的决定因素进行叙述综合,并采用随机效应模型对报告设备测量的身体活动或久坐行为的研究进行meta分析。进行调节因子分析以调查实施环境的作用。采用95%置信区间(CI)的标准化组间平均差(SMD)表示效应大小。结果:从31727份个人记录中,确定了2012-2022年间发表的52项符合条件的研究,分别来自社区和卫生保健机构的30项和22项研究。最常报告的是身体健康和福祉类别中的决定因素(n = 23),而只有一项研究报告了社会或文化背景中的决定因素。荟萃分析纳入了18项研究。针对身体健康和幸福的干预措施显示步数增加(SMD = 0.46;95%CI: 0.15至0.77)和中等至高强度体力活动分钟数(SMD = 0.41;95%CI: 0.19至0.64),而针对心理或行为决定因素的干预措施在步骤上没有组间差异(SMD = 0.10;95%CI: -0.12至0.32)和中至高强度体力活动(SMD = 0.26;95%CI: -0.24 ~ -0.75)。针对身体健康和幸福的干预措施显示出显著的异质性(p 2 = 73.10%)。亚组分析显示,8种基于社区的干预措施对设备测量的身体活动有显著影响(SMD = 0.42;95%CI: 0.07至0.77),而在医疗保健环境中进行的8项研究未发现显著影响(SMD = 0.26;95%可信区间;-0.10至0.62)。结论:以身体健康和幸福为目标的干预措施可能会增加老年人的PA,以社区为基础的研究似乎比医疗机构的研究更有效。研究结果的显著异质性表明,需要进一步研究以充分了解PA和SB决定因素在不同环境中的影响,特别是与心理、行为、社会和文化因素相关的影响。系统评价注册:PROSPERO: CRD42022287606。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.60%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Review of Aging and Physical Activity (EURAPA) disseminates research on the biomedical and behavioural aspects of physical activity and aging. The main issues addressed by EURAPA are the impact of physical activity or exercise on cognitive, physical, and psycho-social functioning of older people, physical activity patterns in advanced age, and the relationship between physical activity and health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信