Assessing the Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Nonbacterial Thrombotic Endocarditis Patients.

IF 5.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Danny Tran, Si Young An, Shayna Hale, Faseeh Khaja
{"title":"Assessing the Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Nonbacterial Thrombotic Endocarditis Patients.","authors":"Danny Tran, Si Young An, Shayna Hale, Faseeh Khaja","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.05.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis is a rare condition associated with hypercoagulable states, including malignancy and autoimmune disorders. While unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are recommended first-line anticoagulants, evidence on the use of warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed hospitalized patients with nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2022 using the HCA Healthcare enterprise database. Patients receiving anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin, LMWH, warfarin, or DOACs were included. After excluding 759 patients for missing data, multiple anticoagulants, or extreme length of stay, 3130 patients remained for analysis. Primary outcomes were thromboembolic events, mortality, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference in thromboembolic events (P = .599) or mortality (P = .092) was observed among anticoagulant classes. Cardiac comorbidities were associated with decreased thromboembolic risk (odds ratio 0.3879), while age, malignancy, chronic kidney disease, and cardiac history were associated with higher mortality. Mean hospital length of stay was significantly longer in patients receiving heparin or LMWH (5.94 days) compared with those on DOACs (4.41 days) or warfarin (4.54 days; P < .05). Intensive care unit length of stay did not differ by anticoagulant class.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Warfarin and DOACs may be viable alternatives to heparin-based therapy in nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis, with comparable thromboembolic and mortality outcomes. However, heparin-based regimens were associated with longer hospital stays. Further prospective studies are warranted to guide anticoagulation strategies in nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.05.025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis is a rare condition associated with hypercoagulable states, including malignancy and autoimmune disorders. While unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are recommended first-line anticoagulants, evidence on the use of warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains limited.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed hospitalized patients with nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2022 using the HCA Healthcare enterprise database. Patients receiving anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin, LMWH, warfarin, or DOACs were included. After excluding 759 patients for missing data, multiple anticoagulants, or extreme length of stay, 3130 patients remained for analysis. Primary outcomes were thromboembolic events, mortality, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit length of stay.

Results: No statistically significant difference in thromboembolic events (P = .599) or mortality (P = .092) was observed among anticoagulant classes. Cardiac comorbidities were associated with decreased thromboembolic risk (odds ratio 0.3879), while age, malignancy, chronic kidney disease, and cardiac history were associated with higher mortality. Mean hospital length of stay was significantly longer in patients receiving heparin or LMWH (5.94 days) compared with those on DOACs (4.41 days) or warfarin (4.54 days; P < .05). Intensive care unit length of stay did not differ by anticoagulant class.

Conclusion: Warfarin and DOACs may be viable alternatives to heparin-based therapy in nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis, with comparable thromboembolic and mortality outcomes. However, heparin-based regimens were associated with longer hospital stays. Further prospective studies are warranted to guide anticoagulation strategies in nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis.

评估非细菌性血栓性心内膜炎患者直接口服抗凝剂的疗效。
背景:非细菌性血栓性心内膜炎是一种罕见的与高凝状态相关的疾病,包括恶性肿瘤和自身免疫性疾病。虽然未分级肝素和低分子量肝素(LMWH)是推荐的一线抗凝剂,但华法林和直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)的使用证据仍然有限。方法:采用HCA医疗企业数据库,对2016年1月1日至2022年12月31日住院的非细菌性血栓性心内膜炎患者进行回顾性队列研究。接受未分级肝素、低分子肝素、华法林或doac抗凝治疗的患者包括在内。在排除759例数据缺失、使用多种抗凝剂或住院时间过长的患者后,3130例患者仍待分析。主要结局是血栓栓塞事件、死亡率、住院时间和重症监护病房的住院时间。结果:不同抗凝药物类别在血栓栓塞事件(p = 0.599)和死亡率(p = 0.092)方面无统计学差异。心脏合并症与血栓栓塞风险降低相关(OR = 0.3879),而年龄、恶性肿瘤、慢性肾脏疾病和心脏病史与较高的死亡率相关。接受肝素或低分子肝素的患者平均住院时间(5.94天)明显长于接受DOACs(4.41天)或华法林(4.54天;P < 0.05)。重症监护病房的住院时间没有因抗凝药物类别而异。结论:华法林和DOACs可能是基于肝素的非细菌性血栓性心内膜炎治疗的可行替代方案,血栓栓塞和死亡率结果相当。然而,以肝素为基础的治疗方案与更长的住院时间有关。进一步的前瞻性研究有必要指导非细菌性血栓性心内膜炎的抗凝策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Medicine
American Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
449
审稿时长
9 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信