Examining Health Literacy and Appropriateness of Commercially Developed Patient Education Materials for Adults Living With Diabetes on the U.S./Mexico Border.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Shiloh A Williams, Shih-Fan Lin, Stephen Jaime, Beverly Carlson, Maria Keckler
{"title":"Examining Health Literacy and Appropriateness of Commercially Developed Patient Education Materials for Adults Living With Diabetes on the U.S./Mexico Border.","authors":"Shiloh A Williams, Shih-Fan Lin, Stephen Jaime, Beverly Carlson, Maria Keckler","doi":"10.1177/10547738251343418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective patient education is critical to an individual's treatment plan when living with diabetes, a debilitating disease requiring extensive knowledge and skills to effectively manage and prevent future morbidity. This descriptive, cross-sectional study assessed the appropriateness of commercially developed patient education materials for rural adults with diabetes. Using electronic health record data from patients (<i>n</i> = 132) with documented health literacy levels (HLL), their HLL scores were reviewed for suitability of educational materials provided by a single rural-border hospital. HLL was measured using the Newest Vital Sign, while educational materials were assessed by two independent reviewers using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials to measure understandability and actionability, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook to measure the readability level of documents in both English and Spanish. The mean HLL for Spanish speakers (<i>n</i> = 77) was 2.01 (±1.56), while the mean HLL for English speakers (<i>n</i> = 55) was 2.09 (±1.46), indicating a high likelihood of low health literacy. The materials were evaluated with the English materials achieving an understandability score of 83.33% and an actionability score of 60.00%. By contrast, the Spanish materials scored lower, 61.54% and 20.00%, respectively. In addition, the readability of the materials measured a 9.0 grade level for English materials and a slightly higher 10.8 for Spanish materials. These findings highlight a significant discrepancy between the HLL and the appropriateness of educational materials for the sample population. Although commercially available educational products may provide a budget-concise solution to patient education, particularly in low-resourced organizations, they fail to address the health education needs of the individuals who receive them. Despite the project's limited sample size and single geographical location, it underscores the importance for healthcare organizations to address the health education needs of their communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50677,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"10547738251343418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738251343418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective patient education is critical to an individual's treatment plan when living with diabetes, a debilitating disease requiring extensive knowledge and skills to effectively manage and prevent future morbidity. This descriptive, cross-sectional study assessed the appropriateness of commercially developed patient education materials for rural adults with diabetes. Using electronic health record data from patients (n = 132) with documented health literacy levels (HLL), their HLL scores were reviewed for suitability of educational materials provided by a single rural-border hospital. HLL was measured using the Newest Vital Sign, while educational materials were assessed by two independent reviewers using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials to measure understandability and actionability, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook to measure the readability level of documents in both English and Spanish. The mean HLL for Spanish speakers (n = 77) was 2.01 (±1.56), while the mean HLL for English speakers (n = 55) was 2.09 (±1.46), indicating a high likelihood of low health literacy. The materials were evaluated with the English materials achieving an understandability score of 83.33% and an actionability score of 60.00%. By contrast, the Spanish materials scored lower, 61.54% and 20.00%, respectively. In addition, the readability of the materials measured a 9.0 grade level for English materials and a slightly higher 10.8 for Spanish materials. These findings highlight a significant discrepancy between the HLL and the appropriateness of educational materials for the sample population. Although commercially available educational products may provide a budget-concise solution to patient education, particularly in low-resourced organizations, they fail to address the health education needs of the individuals who receive them. Despite the project's limited sample size and single geographical location, it underscores the importance for healthcare organizations to address the health education needs of their communities.

检查美国/墨西哥边境成人糖尿病患者的健康素养和商业开发的患者教育材料的适当性
当患有糖尿病时,有效的患者教育对个人的治疗计划至关重要,糖尿病是一种使人衰弱的疾病,需要广泛的知识和技能来有效地管理和预防未来的发病率。这项描述性横断面研究评估了商业开发的农村成人糖尿病患者教育材料的适宜性。利用来自记录健康素养水平(HLL)的患者(n = 132)的电子健康记录数据,对他们的HLL分数进行了评估,以确定是否适合一家农村边境医院提供的教育材料。HLL采用最新生命体征测量,而教育材料由两位独立的审稿人评估,使用可打印材料的患者教育材料评估工具来测量可理解性和可操作性,以及Gobbledygook的简单测量来测量英语和西班牙语文档的可读性水平。西班牙语使用者(n = 77)的平均HLL为2.01(±1.56),而英语使用者(n = 55)的平均HLL为2.09(±1.46),表明健康素养低的可能性很大。英语材料的可理解性评分为83.33%,可操作性评分为60.00%。相比之下,西班牙材料得分较低,分别为61.54%和20.00%。此外,英语材料的可读性为9.0级,西班牙语材料的可读性略高,为10.8级。这些发现突出了HLL与样本人群的教育材料的适当性之间的显著差异。虽然市售教育产品可能为患者教育提供预算简明的解决方案,特别是在资源匮乏的组织中,但它们无法满足接受这些产品的个人的健康教育需求。尽管该项目样本量有限且地理位置单一,但它强调了医疗保健组织解决其社区健康教育需求的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
107
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Nursing Research (CNR) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that addresses issues of clinical research that are meaningful to practicing nurses, providing an international forum to encourage discussion among clinical practitioners, enhance clinical practice by pinpointing potential clinical applications of the latest scholarly research, and disseminate research findings of particular interest to practicing nurses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信