Perspectives of Medical Students in Using Blended Learning: A Thematic Analysis.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-05-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S515941
Nawal H Almohammadi, Nada M Elnugomi, Abeer Abuzeid Atta Elmannan, Marwa M Zalat
{"title":"Perspectives of Medical Students in Using Blended Learning: A Thematic Analysis.","authors":"Nawal H Almohammadi, Nada M Elnugomi, Abeer Abuzeid Atta Elmannan, Marwa M Zalat","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S515941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Today, blended learning (BL) is crucial for the implementation of technologically enhanced pedagogical innovations especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to explore students' perspectives toward BL and how a blended learning method affects medical students' learning results. Additionally, it seeks to identify BL challenges, advantages, and disadvantages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative design using a thematic analysis was used. The study included 48 female medical students from years three through six who switched from traditional face-to-face to online during COVID-19 to mixed learning in the post-COVID-19 era.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were extracted from focus group discussions. Three broad themes emerged from thematic analysis: perceived self-efficacy, blended learning as the new normal, and institutional support. Blended learning was the most students preferred because they could adapt quickly to the combination of online and face-to-face learning. Institutional support played a significant role in determining students' learning outcomes from the sudden switch.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study underscored the importance of BL to maximize student learning while maintaining health and safety procedures. The students' adherence to school schedules, which required them to be disciplined regarding time, travel, and class preparation, contributed to their development of excellent habits. However, this presents a challenge for institutions that continue to offer an outstanding education despite the increasing acceptance of blended learning, as it may influence the motivation and learning outcomes of future doctors. These results are beneficial for educators and students in universities to have better institutional policies and strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"837-847"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S515941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Today, blended learning (BL) is crucial for the implementation of technologically enhanced pedagogical innovations especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to explore students' perspectives toward BL and how a blended learning method affects medical students' learning results. Additionally, it seeks to identify BL challenges, advantages, and disadvantages.

Methods: A qualitative design using a thematic analysis was used. The study included 48 female medical students from years three through six who switched from traditional face-to-face to online during COVID-19 to mixed learning in the post-COVID-19 era.

Results: Data were extracted from focus group discussions. Three broad themes emerged from thematic analysis: perceived self-efficacy, blended learning as the new normal, and institutional support. Blended learning was the most students preferred because they could adapt quickly to the combination of online and face-to-face learning. Institutional support played a significant role in determining students' learning outcomes from the sudden switch.

Conclusion: The findings of this study underscored the importance of BL to maximize student learning while maintaining health and safety procedures. The students' adherence to school schedules, which required them to be disciplined regarding time, travel, and class preparation, contributed to their development of excellent habits. However, this presents a challenge for institutions that continue to offer an outstanding education despite the increasing acceptance of blended learning, as it may influence the motivation and learning outcomes of future doctors. These results are beneficial for educators and students in universities to have better institutional policies and strategies.

医学生使用混合学习的观点:专题分析。
背景:今天,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后,混合学习对于实施技术增强的教学创新至关重要。本研究旨在探讨医学生对BL的看法,以及混合式学习方法如何影响医学生的学习效果。此外,它还试图确定BL的挑战、优势和劣势。方法:采用专题分析的定性设计。该研究包括48名三至六年级的女医学生,她们在新冠肺炎期间从传统的面对面学习转向在线学习,并在后新冠肺炎时代转向混合学习。结果:数据来自焦点小组讨论。从主题分析中出现了三个大主题:感知自我效能,混合学习作为新常态,以及机构支持。混合式学习是大多数学生的首选,因为他们可以快速适应在线和面对面学习的结合。机构支持在决定学生突然转换后的学习成果方面发挥了重要作用。结论:本研究的结果强调了BL在保持健康和安全程序的同时最大限度地提高学生学习的重要性。学生们严格遵守学校的课程表,这要求他们在时间、旅行和备课方面严格遵守纪律,这有助于他们养成良好的习惯。然而,这对那些继续提供优秀教育的机构提出了挑战,尽管混合式学习越来越被接受,因为它可能会影响未来医生的动机和学习成果。这些结果有利于高校教育工作者和学生制定更好的制度政策和策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信