Unresolved ethical questions of mHealth apps for Alzheimer's disease prevention.

IF 2.3 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Karina Korecky, Silke Schicktanz
{"title":"Unresolved ethical questions of mHealth apps for Alzheimer's disease prevention.","authors":"Karina Korecky, Silke Schicktanz","doi":"10.1007/s11019-025-10272-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, medical research has sparked hope that up to a third of dementia cases could be prevented. This optimism is driven by a shift in the understanding of dementia and, in particular, Alzheimer's Disease (AD)-from being a rapid-onset brain disease in later life to a condition strongly linked to lifestyle factors, progressing slowly and gradually through asymptomatic, pre-symptomatic, and symptomatic stages with varying degrees of severity. Accompanying this evolving perception, the use of mobile healthcare applications (mHealth apps) based on dementia prevention research has been on the rise. Health policymakers and companies increasingly advocate for these apps. However, concerns remain about the medical quality of such mHealth apps for dementia prevention. Bioethical research has highlighted significant challenges associated with their use. This paper critically examines dementia prevention strategies through the lenses of mHealth technologies. Exploring four mHealth apps for dementia prevention as case studies, we identify and analyze unsolved ethical issues related to primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. Hereby we offer a new perspective on familiar ethical dilemmas in dementia prevention, and emphasize the need to examine potentially intensified challenges in the context of digital health in the future in more depth.</p>","PeriodicalId":47449,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-025-10272-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, medical research has sparked hope that up to a third of dementia cases could be prevented. This optimism is driven by a shift in the understanding of dementia and, in particular, Alzheimer's Disease (AD)-from being a rapid-onset brain disease in later life to a condition strongly linked to lifestyle factors, progressing slowly and gradually through asymptomatic, pre-symptomatic, and symptomatic stages with varying degrees of severity. Accompanying this evolving perception, the use of mobile healthcare applications (mHealth apps) based on dementia prevention research has been on the rise. Health policymakers and companies increasingly advocate for these apps. However, concerns remain about the medical quality of such mHealth apps for dementia prevention. Bioethical research has highlighted significant challenges associated with their use. This paper critically examines dementia prevention strategies through the lenses of mHealth technologies. Exploring four mHealth apps for dementia prevention as case studies, we identify and analyze unsolved ethical issues related to primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. Hereby we offer a new perspective on familiar ethical dilemmas in dementia prevention, and emphasize the need to examine potentially intensified challenges in the context of digital health in the future in more depth.

预防阿尔茨海默病的移动医疗应用程序尚未解决的伦理问题。
近年来,医学研究燃起了希望,认为多达三分之一的痴呆症病例是可以预防的。这种乐观是由于人们对痴呆症,特别是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的认识发生了转变——从一种晚年快速发作的脑部疾病,转变为一种与生活方式因素密切相关的疾病,在不同严重程度的无症状、症状前和症状阶段缓慢渐进地发展。随着这种观念的发展,基于痴呆症预防研究的移动医疗应用程序(移动健康应用程序)的使用也在增加。卫生政策制定者和公司越来越多地支持这些应用程序。然而,人们仍然对这些用于预防痴呆症的移动健康应用程序的医疗质量感到担忧。生物伦理研究强调了与它们的使用相关的重大挑战。本文通过移动医疗技术的镜头批判性地考察了痴呆症预防策略。我们以四个预防痴呆症的移动健康应用程序为案例研究,确定并分析了与初级、二级和三级预防相关的未解决的伦理问题。因此,我们对痴呆症预防中常见的伦理困境提出了新的视角,并强调有必要更深入地研究未来数字健康背景下可能加剧的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy: A European Journal is the official journal of the European Society for Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care. It provides a forum for international exchange of research data, theories, reports and opinions in bioethics and philosophy of medicine. The journal promotes interdisciplinary studies, and stimulates philosophical analysis centered on a common object of reflection: health care, the human effort to deal with disease, illness, death as well as health, well-being and life. Particular attention is paid to developing contributions from all European countries, and to making accessible scientific work and reports on the practice of health care ethics, from all nations, cultures and language areas in Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信