Mid-Upper Arm Circumference as a Surrogate for Nutritional Assessment in Surgical Patients: Insights from Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition Criteria Screening.

IF 1.5 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.21315/mjms-10-2024-789
Siang Poon Goh, Mawaddah Azman, Zaleha Md Isa
{"title":"Mid-Upper Arm Circumference as a Surrogate for Nutritional Assessment in Surgical Patients: Insights from Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition Criteria Screening.","authors":"Siang Poon Goh, Mawaddah Azman, Zaleha Md Isa","doi":"10.21315/mjms-10-2024-789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Undernutrition significantly affects surgical patient outcomes, prompting the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) to establish a set of diagnostic criteria. This study assessed the prevalence of undernutrition using the GLIM criteria and determined a mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) cutoff for malnutrition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2021 to May 2023. Biodata, information necessary for GLIM criteria, and anthropometric measurements including height, body weight, MUAC, fat mass (FM), and fat-free mass (FFM), were collected. Correlations among indicators analysed using Pearson's correlation. The MUAC cutoff points for underweight, obesity, and undernourishment were derived using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC), and the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite a mean body mass index (BMI) of 25.8 (6.0) kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 30.0% of the patients met the GLIM undernutrition criteria. Overall, 13.4% of the patients were overweight, and 54.2% were obese. ROC analysis showed MUAC measures with an AUC ranging from 0.66-0.97. A MUAC cutoff of 28.9 cm identified undernourished patients with 66.7% sensitivity, 67.1% specificity, and 46.6% positive predictive value (PPV). Notably, the PPV increased to 75.4% in patients with cancer. The optimal MUAC cutoffs derived from the fat-free mass index (FFMI) for undernourished males and females were 26.8 cm and 26.1 cm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Malnutrition is prevalent among surgical patients. The MUAC is a promising surrogate for assessing BMI and FFMI and serves as a valuable screening tool for nutritional status. These findings emphasise the importance of nutritional assessment in surgical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47388,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"32 1","pages":"99-109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12097170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms-10-2024-789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Undernutrition significantly affects surgical patient outcomes, prompting the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) to establish a set of diagnostic criteria. This study assessed the prevalence of undernutrition using the GLIM criteria and determined a mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) cutoff for malnutrition.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2021 to May 2023. Biodata, information necessary for GLIM criteria, and anthropometric measurements including height, body weight, MUAC, fat mass (FM), and fat-free mass (FFM), were collected. Correlations among indicators analysed using Pearson's correlation. The MUAC cutoff points for underweight, obesity, and undernourishment were derived using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC), and the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

Results: Despite a mean body mass index (BMI) of 25.8 (6.0) kg/m2, 30.0% of the patients met the GLIM undernutrition criteria. Overall, 13.4% of the patients were overweight, and 54.2% were obese. ROC analysis showed MUAC measures with an AUC ranging from 0.66-0.97. A MUAC cutoff of 28.9 cm identified undernourished patients with 66.7% sensitivity, 67.1% specificity, and 46.6% positive predictive value (PPV). Notably, the PPV increased to 75.4% in patients with cancer. The optimal MUAC cutoffs derived from the fat-free mass index (FFMI) for undernourished males and females were 26.8 cm and 26.1 cm, respectively.

Conclusion: Malnutrition is prevalent among surgical patients. The MUAC is a promising surrogate for assessing BMI and FFMI and serves as a valuable screening tool for nutritional status. These findings emphasise the importance of nutritional assessment in surgical care.

中上臂围作为外科患者营养评估的替代指标:来自营养不良标准筛选全球领导倡议的见解。
背景:营养不良显著影响手术患者的预后,促使全球营养不良领导倡议(GLIM)建立一套诊断标准。本研究使用GLIM标准评估营养不良的患病率,并确定了营养不良的中上臂围(MUAC)临界值。方法:本横断面研究于2021年12月至2023年5月进行。收集生物数据、GLIM标准所需的信息和人体测量数据,包括身高、体重、MUAC、脂肪质量(FM)和无脂肪质量(FFM)。使用Pearson相关分析指标之间的相关性。根据受试者工作特征(ROC)和曲线下面积(AUC)得出体重不足、肥胖和营养不良的MUAC截止点,并计算敏感性、特异性和阳性和阴性预测值。结果:尽管平均体重指数(BMI)为25.8 (6.0)kg/m2,但仍有30.0%的患者符合GLIM营养不良标准。总体而言,13.4%的患者超重,54.2%的患者肥胖。ROC分析显示MUAC测量值的AUC范围为0.66-0.97。MUAC临界值为28.9 cm,确定营养不良患者的敏感性为66.7%,特异性为67.1%,阳性预测值为46.6%。值得注意的是,癌症患者的PPV增加到75.4%。根据无脂肪质量指数(FFMI),营养不良雄性和雌性的最佳MUAC截止值分别为26.8 cm和26.1 cm。结论:手术患者营养不良普遍存在。MUAC是评估BMI和FFMI的一种很有前途的替代方法,也是营养状况的一种有价值的筛选工具。这些发现强调了营养评估在外科护理中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences
Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences (MJMS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access, fully online journal that is published at least six times a year. The journal’s scope encompasses all aspects of medical sciences including biomedical, allied health, clinical and social sciences. We accept high quality papers from basic to translational research especially from low & middle income countries, as classified by the United Nations & World Bank (https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/ articles/906519), with the aim that published research will benefit back the bottom billion population from these countries. Manuscripts submitted from developed or high income countries to MJMS must contain data and information that will benefit the socio-health and bio-medical sciences of these low and middle income countries. The MJMS editorial board consists of internationally regarded clinicians and scientists from low and middle income countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信