Interrater Reliability of Functional Movement Screening Test among Untrained Undergraduate Raters Undergoing a One-off Training Session.

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL

Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.21315/mjms-09-2024-740

Zulezwan Ab Malik, Fadlin Sakina Abd Kadir, Engku Nurul Izzatul Iffah, Muhamad Hakimi M Yussof, M Nur Asraf Ismail, Nor Fazila Abd Malek, Ali Md Nadzalan, Hairul Anuar Hashim

{"title":"Interrater Reliability of Functional Movement Screening Test among Untrained Undergraduate Raters Undergoing a One-off Training Session.","authors":"Zulezwan Ab Malik, Fadlin Sakina Abd Kadir, Engku Nurul Izzatul Iffah, Muhamad Hakimi M Yussof, M Nur Asraf Ismail, Nor Fazila Abd Malek, Ali Md Nadzalan, Hairul Anuar Hashim","doi":"10.21315/mjms-09-2024-740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Functional Movement Screen (FMS)™ can be a valuable tool for assessing movement patterns and identifying potential movement dysfunctions. However, it is limited in terms of subjectivity and consistency of the ratings, especially among less proficient raters. Knowledge of minimally required training thresholds will provide valuable information on training adequacy. Thus, this study aimed to determine the interrater reliability of FMS™ among completely novice raters undergoing a one-off training session.Methods: Twenty active adults with no musculoskeletal injuries or muscular dysfunction performed seven FMS™ tasks while being recorded. Subsequently, 12 novice raters with no prior knowledge and skills about FMS™ rated the recorded movement videos at a normal play speed and without rewinding.Results: The interrater reliability analysis of the composite FMS™ score revealed an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.60. Moreover, the mean coefficient for interrater reliability for the seven FMS™ components score is 0.35.Conclusion: The results implied that a one-off FMS™ training produced a large variability in the rating consistency, especially for rotary stability, deep squats, and in-line lunge ratings.","PeriodicalId":47388,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"32 1","pages":"121-126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12097155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms-09-2024-740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Functional Movement Screen (FMS)™ can be a valuable tool for assessing movement patterns and identifying potential movement dysfunctions. However, it is limited in terms of subjectivity and consistency of the ratings, especially among less proficient raters. Knowledge of minimally required training thresholds will provide valuable information on training adequacy. Thus, this study aimed to determine the interrater reliability of FMS™ among completely novice raters undergoing a one-off training session.

Methods: Twenty active adults with no musculoskeletal injuries or muscular dysfunction performed seven FMS™ tasks while being recorded. Subsequently, 12 novice raters with no prior knowledge and skills about FMS™ rated the recorded movement videos at a normal play speed and without rewinding.

Results: The interrater reliability analysis of the composite FMS™ score revealed an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of 0.60. Moreover, the mean coefficient for interrater reliability for the seven FMS™ components score is 0.35.

Conclusion: The results implied that a one-off FMS™ training produced a large variability in the rating consistency, especially for rotary stability, deep squats, and in-line lunge ratings.

查看原文本刊更多论文

功能运动筛选测试在未受过训练的大学生评分员中进行一次性训练的信度。

背景：功能运动屏幕（FMS）™是评估运动模式和识别潜在运动功能障碍的有价值的工具。然而，它在评分的主观性和一致性方面受到限制，特别是在不太熟练的评分者中。了解最低要求的培训门槛将提供关于培训充分性的宝贵信息。因此，本研究旨在确定FMS™在接受一次性培训的完全新手评判员中的相互信度。方法：20名没有肌肉骨骼损伤或肌肉功能障碍的活跃成年人在记录的同时执行了7项FMS™任务。随后，12名没有关于FMS™的先验知识和技能的新手评分者以正常播放速度和不倒带的方式对录制的运动视频进行评分。结果：综合FMS™评分的间信度分析显示，类内相关系数（ICC）为0.60。此外，七个FMS™成分评分的互译信度平均系数为0.35。结论：结果表明，一次性FMS™训练在评分一致性方面产生了很大的变化，特别是在旋转稳定性、深蹲和直线弓步评分方面。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

9 weeks

期刊介绍： The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences (MJMS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access, fully online journal that is published at least six times a year. The journal’s scope encompasses all aspects of medical sciences including biomedical, allied health, clinical and social sciences. We accept high quality papers from basic to translational research especially from low & middle income countries, as classified by the United Nations & World Bank (https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/ articles/906519), with the aim that published research will benefit back the bottom billion population from these countries. Manuscripts submitted from developed or high income countries to MJMS must contain data and information that will benefit the socio-health and bio-medical sciences of these low and middle income countries. The MJMS editorial board consists of internationally regarded clinicians and scientists from low and middle income countries.