Reduced stent strategy versus conventional percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI: the COPERNICAN trial.

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jorge Sanz-Sánchez, Sandra Santos Martínez, Eva Rumiz González, Juan Francisco Oteo Domínguez, David Tejada Ponce, Antonio Gómez Menchero, Guillermo Sánchez Elvira, Georgina Fuertes Ferre, Fernando Rivero Crespo, Antonela Lukic Otanovic, José Díaz Fernández, Eladio Galindo Fernández, Cristóbal Urbano Carrillo, Neus Salvatella Giralt, Mauricio Torres Sánchez, Arturo García Touchard, Borja Ibáñez Cabeza, Giulio Stefanini, Fernando Alfonso Manterola, Héctor García García, Ignacio J Amat-Santos
{"title":"Reduced stent strategy versus conventional percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI: the COPERNICAN trial.","authors":"Jorge Sanz-Sánchez, Sandra Santos Martínez, Eva Rumiz González, Juan Francisco Oteo Domínguez, David Tejada Ponce, Antonio Gómez Menchero, Guillermo Sánchez Elvira, Georgina Fuertes Ferre, Fernando Rivero Crespo, Antonela Lukic Otanovic, José Díaz Fernández, Eladio Galindo Fernández, Cristóbal Urbano Carrillo, Neus Salvatella Giralt, Mauricio Torres Sánchez, Arturo García Touchard, Borja Ibáñez Cabeza, Giulio Stefanini, Fernando Alfonso Manterola, Héctor García García, Ignacio J Amat-Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.rec.2025.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent implantation (DES) is the standard of treatment in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, target lesion failure can occur due to stent underexpansion, malapposition, hypersensitivity, fracture, and neoatherosclerosis. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) represent a potential alternative supported by the concept of \"leaving nothing behind.\" The aim is to compare a reduced stent strategy based on DCB- with DES-PCI in patients presenting with STEMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, pragmatic, multicenter, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1 272 patients presenting with STEMI will be randomized to any paclitaxel-DCB vs any sirolimus-DES (both with CE approval) for all culprit and nonculprit lesions during PCI. The primary endpoint will be target-lesion failure: cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization at 12-month follow-up. An independent clinical events committee masked to treatment allocation will adjudicate all suspected events. Clinical follow-up will be performed after 1 month (30 days ± 5 days) and 1 year (365 days ± 30 days). An extended follow-up at 3, 5, and 10 years is planned..</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COPERNICAN trial will be the first randomized study comparing clinical outcomes of DCB vs DES in STEMI patients.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov: NCT06353594.</p>","PeriodicalId":38430,"journal":{"name":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista española de cardiología (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2025.05.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent implantation (DES) is the standard of treatment in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, target lesion failure can occur due to stent underexpansion, malapposition, hypersensitivity, fracture, and neoatherosclerosis. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) represent a potential alternative supported by the concept of "leaving nothing behind." The aim is to compare a reduced stent strategy based on DCB- with DES-PCI in patients presenting with STEMI.

Methods: Prospective, pragmatic, multicenter, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial.

Results: A total of 1 272 patients presenting with STEMI will be randomized to any paclitaxel-DCB vs any sirolimus-DES (both with CE approval) for all culprit and nonculprit lesions during PCI. The primary endpoint will be target-lesion failure: cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization at 12-month follow-up. An independent clinical events committee masked to treatment allocation will adjudicate all suspected events. Clinical follow-up will be performed after 1 month (30 days ± 5 days) and 1 year (365 days ± 30 days). An extended follow-up at 3, 5, and 10 years is planned..

Conclusions: The COPERNICAN trial will be the first randomized study comparing clinical outcomes of DCB vs DES in STEMI patients.

Clinicaltrials: gov: NCT06353594.

STEMI患者减少支架策略与传统经皮冠状动脉血管重建术:哥白尼试验
简介和目的:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)联合药物洗脱支架植入术(DES)是st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的标准治疗方法。然而,由于支架扩张不足、错位、过敏、骨折和新动脉粥样硬化,靶病变失败可能发生。药物涂层气球(DCB)代表了一种潜在的替代方案,它得到了“不留下任何东西”概念的支持。目的是比较基于DCB-和DES-PCI的缩小支架策略在STEMI患者中的应用。方法:前瞻性、实用性、多中心、非劣效性、随机临床试验。结果:共有1272名STEMI患者将被随机分配到任何紫杉醇- dcb和任何西罗莫司- des(均获得CE批准),用于PCI期间所有罪魁祸首和非罪魁祸首病变。在12个月的随访中,主要终点将是靶病变衰竭:心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死或缺血驱动的靶病变血运重建术。一个独立的临床事件委员会负责治疗分配,对所有可疑事件进行裁决。临床随访时间分别为1个月(30天±5天)和1年(365天±30天)。结论:哥白尼试验将是首个比较DCB和DES治疗STEMI患者临床结果的随机研究。临床试验网站:NCT06353594。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
219
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信