A Systematic Review of the Use of Doulas to Support Rural Perinatal People in the United States.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Maternal and Child Health Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-26 DOI:10.1007/s10995-025-04106-6
Jessica L Liddell, Al Garnsey, Annie Glover, Emma Piskolich
{"title":"A Systematic Review of the Use of Doulas to Support Rural Perinatal People in the United States.","authors":"Jessica L Liddell, Al Garnsey, Annie Glover, Emma Piskolich","doi":"10.1007/s10995-025-04106-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Maternal health outcomes are frequently worse for individuals living in rural and remote communities due to the distance people must travel for healthcare, higher rates of poverty, and higher risk factors for related health conditions, such as mental illness and substance use. Doulas, non-medical childbirth companions, provide emotional, informational, physical, and advocacy support to people during pregnancy, birth, and postpartum. Research has documented doulas' positive impact on birth outcomes, including lower rates of induction and cesarean birth. The benefits of doulas may be especially important for marginalized and underserved populations who experience disparate health outcomes, including rural residents. This scoping review was conducted to describe and assess the landscape of doula-focused research that focuses on the unique contextual challenges faced by rural communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of research exploring the use of doulas in rural contexts. Peer-reviewed articles presenting original research using both quantitative and qualitative methods were included. Target populations for the included studies were rural perinatal people receiving doula support or doulas in rural contexts. All definitions of rurality were included. Database index terms were searched as well as keyword search terms: \"rural\" AND \"doula\" OR \"labor coach\" OR \"birthing coach\" OR \"childbirth coach\" OR \"birth attendant\" AND \"United States\" OR \"U.S.A.\"12 peer-reviewed journal databases and Google Scholar were searched May 2022- September 2023. Data was synthesized using tabular and narrative methods to capture (a) study design and type, b) study purpose, c) population, d) study location, e) analysis, d) definition of rurality, and e) reported results and gaps in the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2,195 articles were identified. After removing duplicates and ineligible studies, 3 articles were included in the final results. These articles included quantitative (1), qualitative (1), and mixed methods (1) studies exploring access to and perceptions of doulas in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings demonstrate limited scholarship on the use of doulas in rural settings. This area of research warrants further attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"733-740"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04106-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Maternal health outcomes are frequently worse for individuals living in rural and remote communities due to the distance people must travel for healthcare, higher rates of poverty, and higher risk factors for related health conditions, such as mental illness and substance use. Doulas, non-medical childbirth companions, provide emotional, informational, physical, and advocacy support to people during pregnancy, birth, and postpartum. Research has documented doulas' positive impact on birth outcomes, including lower rates of induction and cesarean birth. The benefits of doulas may be especially important for marginalized and underserved populations who experience disparate health outcomes, including rural residents. This scoping review was conducted to describe and assess the landscape of doula-focused research that focuses on the unique contextual challenges faced by rural communities.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review of research exploring the use of doulas in rural contexts. Peer-reviewed articles presenting original research using both quantitative and qualitative methods were included. Target populations for the included studies were rural perinatal people receiving doula support or doulas in rural contexts. All definitions of rurality were included. Database index terms were searched as well as keyword search terms: "rural" AND "doula" OR "labor coach" OR "birthing coach" OR "childbirth coach" OR "birth attendant" AND "United States" OR "U.S.A."12 peer-reviewed journal databases and Google Scholar were searched May 2022- September 2023. Data was synthesized using tabular and narrative methods to capture (a) study design and type, b) study purpose, c) population, d) study location, e) analysis, d) definition of rurality, and e) reported results and gaps in the literature.

Results: 2,195 articles were identified. After removing duplicates and ineligible studies, 3 articles were included in the final results. These articles included quantitative (1), qualitative (1), and mixed methods (1) studies exploring access to and perceptions of doulas in rural areas.

Conclusion: Findings demonstrate limited scholarship on the use of doulas in rural settings. This area of research warrants further attention.

在美国使用导乐来支持农村围产期人的系统评价。
导言:生活在农村和偏远社区的个人的孕产妇健康结果往往更差,因为人们必须长途跋涉才能获得保健服务,贫困率更高,相关健康状况(如精神疾病和药物使用)的风险因素更高。助产师,非医疗分娩伴侣,在怀孕、分娩和产后为人们提供情感、信息、身体和宣传支持。研究证明了助产师对分娩结果的积极影响,包括降低引产率和剖宫产率。助产师的好处可能对经历不同健康结果的边缘化和服务不足人群尤其重要,包括农村居民。这一范围审查是为了描述和评估以农村社区面临的独特背景挑战为重点的多拉研究的前景。方法:我们进行了范围审查的研究,探索在农村环境中使用助产师。采用定量和定性方法发表原创研究的同行评议文章被纳入。纳入研究的目标人群是接受助产师支持的农村围产期患者或农村地区的助产师。所有关于乡村性的定义都包括在内。检索了数据库索引术语以及关键词搜索术语:“农村”和“助产师”或“分娩教练”或“分娩教练”或“助产士”和“美国”或“美国”研究人员于2022年5月至2023年9月对12个同行评审期刊数据库和谷歌Scholar进行了检索。使用表格和叙述方法对数据进行综合,以捕获(a)研究设计和类型,b)研究目的,c)人口,d)研究地点,e)分析,d)乡村性定义,e)报告的结果和文献中的空白。结果:共鉴定2195篇。在剔除重复和不符合的研究后,最终结果纳入了3篇文章。这些文章包括定量(1)、定性(1)和混合方法(1)研究,探索农村地区助产师的获取和认知。结论:研究结果表明,在农村地区使用助产师的学术研究有限。这个研究领域值得进一步关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Maternal and Child Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
271
期刊介绍: Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment Innovative MCH service initiatives Implementation of MCH programs MCH policy analysis and advocacy MCH professional development. Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology. Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信