Demographic Differences Between Applicants Who Submitted Rank Order Lists and Applicants Who Matched in 2022 and 2023.

Journal of graduate medical education Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-15 DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-24-00512.1
Jenny X Chen, Francis Deng
{"title":"Demographic Differences Between Applicants Who Submitted Rank Order Lists and Applicants Who Matched in 2022 and 2023.","authors":"Jenny X Chen, Francis Deng","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-24-00512.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Resident selection processes may alter the representation of applicants with certain demographic characteristics. The impact of potential biases at each phase of selection should be examined. <b>Objective</b> To investigate the differences between applicants who submit rank order lists (ROLs) and applicants who match in the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Main Residency Match. <b>Methods</b> We analyzed publicly available NRMP data for the 2022 and 2023 Matches to compare self-reported sex, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, disability status, and citizenship between applicants who submitted ROLs and applicants who matched. <b>Results</b> Of the 73 426 applicants who submitted ROLs, 60 655 applicants matched. A higher percentage of matched applicants were female as compared to those who submitted ROLs (+2.0%, 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.5). A higher percentage of matched applicants identified as bisexual (+0.2%, 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.4), whereas a lower percentage of matched applicants identified as heterosexual (-0.4%, 95% CI, -0.7 to -0.1). White applicants represented a higher percentage of matched applicants (+2.9%, 95% CI, 2.3 to 3.4), whereas Asian and Black/African American applicants comprised lower percentages of matched applicants as compared to all applicants (Asian: -1.5%, 95% CI, -2 to -1; Black/African American: -0.6%, 95% CI, -1 to -0.3). Hispanic/Latino and non-US citizens also comprised lower percentages of matched applicants (Hispanic/Latino: -0.5%, 95% CI, -0.8 to -0.1; non-US citizen: -4.9%, 95% CI, -5.3 to -4.5). There was no difference for applicants with disabilities. <b>Conclusions</b> Differences exist between the demographics of applicants who submitted ROLs compared to those who matched.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"17 2","pages":"196-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12096123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-24-00512.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Resident selection processes may alter the representation of applicants with certain demographic characteristics. The impact of potential biases at each phase of selection should be examined. Objective To investigate the differences between applicants who submit rank order lists (ROLs) and applicants who match in the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) Main Residency Match. Methods We analyzed publicly available NRMP data for the 2022 and 2023 Matches to compare self-reported sex, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, disability status, and citizenship between applicants who submitted ROLs and applicants who matched. Results Of the 73 426 applicants who submitted ROLs, 60 655 applicants matched. A higher percentage of matched applicants were female as compared to those who submitted ROLs (+2.0%, 95% CI, 1.4 to 2.5). A higher percentage of matched applicants identified as bisexual (+0.2%, 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.4), whereas a lower percentage of matched applicants identified as heterosexual (-0.4%, 95% CI, -0.7 to -0.1). White applicants represented a higher percentage of matched applicants (+2.9%, 95% CI, 2.3 to 3.4), whereas Asian and Black/African American applicants comprised lower percentages of matched applicants as compared to all applicants (Asian: -1.5%, 95% CI, -2 to -1; Black/African American: -0.6%, 95% CI, -1 to -0.3). Hispanic/Latino and non-US citizens also comprised lower percentages of matched applicants (Hispanic/Latino: -0.5%, 95% CI, -0.8 to -0.1; non-US citizen: -4.9%, 95% CI, -5.3 to -4.5). There was no difference for applicants with disabilities. Conclusions Differences exist between the demographics of applicants who submitted ROLs compared to those who matched.

在2022年和2023年提交排名顺序列表的申请人和匹配的申请人之间的人口统计学差异。
背景:居民选择过程可能会改变具有某些人口特征的申请人的代表性。在选择的每个阶段都应该检查潜在偏差的影响。目的探讨提交排序表(ROLs)的申请人与国家居民匹配计划(NRMP)主居民匹配申请人之间的差异。方法我们分析了2022年和2023年比赛中公开的NRMP数据,比较了提交ROLs的申请人和匹配的申请人之间自我报告的性别、性取向、种族、民族、残疾状况和公民身份。结果在73 426名提交ROLs的申请人中,有60 655名申请人匹配。与提交ROLs的申请人相比,匹配申请人中女性的比例更高(+2.0%,95% CI, 1.4至2.5)。匹配申请人中双性恋者的比例较高(+0.2%,95% CI, 0.04至0.4),而匹配申请人中异性恋者的比例较低(-0.4%,95% CI, -0.7至-0.1)。白人申请人占匹配申请人的百分比较高(+2.9%,95% CI, 2.3至3.4),而亚洲和黑人/非裔美国申请人占匹配申请人的百分比较低,与所有申请人相比(亚洲:-1.5%,95% CI, -2至-1;黑人/非裔美国人:-0.6%,95% CI, -1至-0.3)。西班牙裔/拉丁裔和非美国公民的匹配申请人比例也较低(西班牙裔/拉丁裔:-0.5%,95% CI, -0.8至-0.1;非美国公民:-4.9%,95% CI, -5.3至-4.5)。对于有残疾的申请者来说没有差别。提交ROLs的申请人与匹配的申请人在人口统计学上存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of graduate medical education
Journal of graduate medical education Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
248
期刊介绍: - Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信