Prevalence of positive neural findings in patients attending outpatient physical therapy: an exploratory study.

IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION
Kevin Farrell, Adriaan Louw, Candi Gardner, Collin Besch, Jacob Braun, Kyle Sellers, Paul Mintken
{"title":"Prevalence of positive neural findings in patients attending outpatient physical therapy: an exploratory study.","authors":"Kevin Farrell, Adriaan Louw, Candi Gardner, Collin Besch, Jacob Braun, Kyle Sellers, Paul Mintken","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2025.2509558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neurological testing is commonly used in outpatient physical therapy (PT) for patients with suspected neurological involvement. However, limited data exist on the prevalence of abnormal neurological findings in patients without a peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) diagnosis. Understanding the frequency of these findings may help refine screening practices and improve patient care. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of abnormal neurological findings in patients attending PT without a clinical PNP diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study included 104 adult patients attending PT for upper or lower quadrant pain. Each patient underwent a series of clinical neurologic tests (strength, sensation, and reflexes) and neurodynamic (ND) tests. Patients were categorized as having either a clinical PNP diagnosis or a non-PNP diagnosis based on physician and/or physical therapist assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the participants, 22% had a clinical PNP diagnosis. Among those without a PNP diagnosis, clinical neurologic test abnormalities were common, with 50.6% exhibiting abnormal reflexes, 48.1% showing strength deficits, and 21% having sensory impairments. ND test abnormalities were less frequent in this group, with 18.5% experiencing symptom reproduction during testing.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings suggest that abnormal neurological test results are not exclusive to patients with a clinical PNP diagnosis. The high prevalence of clinical neurologic test abnormalities in patients without a PNP diagnosis raises questions about the sensitivity of current screening approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neurological abnormalities may be overlooked when screening is based solely on clinical diagnosis or reported symptoms. Expanding neurological testing to a broader patient population may enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning. Further research is needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings and the potential benefits of routine neurological screening in outpatient PT.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2025.2509558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Neurological testing is commonly used in outpatient physical therapy (PT) for patients with suspected neurological involvement. However, limited data exist on the prevalence of abnormal neurological findings in patients without a peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP) diagnosis. Understanding the frequency of these findings may help refine screening practices and improve patient care. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of abnormal neurological findings in patients attending PT without a clinical PNP diagnosis.

Methods: This observational study included 104 adult patients attending PT for upper or lower quadrant pain. Each patient underwent a series of clinical neurologic tests (strength, sensation, and reflexes) and neurodynamic (ND) tests. Patients were categorized as having either a clinical PNP diagnosis or a non-PNP diagnosis based on physician and/or physical therapist assessment.

Results: Of the participants, 22% had a clinical PNP diagnosis. Among those without a PNP diagnosis, clinical neurologic test abnormalities were common, with 50.6% exhibiting abnormal reflexes, 48.1% showing strength deficits, and 21% having sensory impairments. ND test abnormalities were less frequent in this group, with 18.5% experiencing symptom reproduction during testing.

Discussion: These findings suggest that abnormal neurological test results are not exclusive to patients with a clinical PNP diagnosis. The high prevalence of clinical neurologic test abnormalities in patients without a PNP diagnosis raises questions about the sensitivity of current screening approaches.

Conclusion: Neurological abnormalities may be overlooked when screening is based solely on clinical diagnosis or reported symptoms. Expanding neurological testing to a broader patient population may enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning. Further research is needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings and the potential benefits of routine neurological screening in outpatient PT.

参加门诊物理治疗的患者中神经阳性发现的患病率:一项探索性研究。
简介:神经测试通常用于门诊物理治疗(PT)的病人怀疑神经受累。然而,在没有周围神经性疼痛(PNP)诊断的患者中,神经系统异常的发生率数据有限。了解这些发现的频率可能有助于改进筛查实践和改善患者护理。本研究旨在确定在没有临床PNP诊断的PT患者中神经系统异常的发生率。方法:本观察性研究纳入104例因上腹或下腹疼痛接受PT治疗的成年患者。每位患者接受了一系列临床神经学测试(力量、感觉和反射)和神经动力学(ND)测试。根据医生和/或物理治疗师的评估,将患者分为临床PNP诊断和非PNP诊断。结果:22%的参与者有临床PNP诊断。在没有PNP诊断的患者中,临床神经测试异常很常见,50.6%表现为反射异常,48.1%表现为力量缺陷,21%表现为感觉障碍。ND测试异常在该组中较少发生,18.5%的患者在测试期间出现症状再现。讨论:这些发现表明神经系统检查结果异常并不仅限于临床诊断为PNP的患者。在没有PNP诊断的患者中,临床神经系统检查异常的高流行率引发了对当前筛查方法敏感性的质疑。结论:仅根据临床诊断或报告症状进行筛查时,可能会忽视神经系统异常。将神经学测试扩展到更广泛的患者群体可以提高诊断的准确性和治疗计划。需要进一步的研究来确定这些发现的临床意义以及门诊PT常规神经学筛查的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信