[[Percutaneous treatment of the left main coronary artery in older adults. Impact of frailty on mid-term results]].

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
REC Interventional Cardiology Pub Date : 2025-02-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.24875/RECIC.M24000471
Ignacio Gallo, Francisco Hidalgo, Rafael González-Manzanares, Marcos Alvarado, Jorge Perea, Javier Suárez de Lezo, Miguel Romero, Soledad Ojeda, Manuel Pan
{"title":"[[Percutaneous treatment of the left main coronary artery in older adults. Impact of frailty on mid-term results]].","authors":"Ignacio Gallo, Francisco Hidalgo, Rafael González-Manzanares, Marcos Alvarado, Jorge Perea, Javier Suárez de Lezo, Miguel Romero, Soledad Ojeda, Manuel Pan","doi":"10.24875/RECIC.M24000471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>In elderly and frail patients, there is limited evidence on the therapeutic management of left main coronary artery (LM) disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate mid-term clinical outcomes in older adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of LM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study including all older patients (≥ 75 years) undergoing LM-PCI at a high-volume center between 2017 and 2021. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Patients were grouped according to the presence of frailty based on the FRAIL scale. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for clinical differences between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 patients were included in the study (median age 80 [78-84]; 36% women). Of them, 49% met the criteria for frailty. After a median follow-up of 19 [5-35] months, 40 MACE (29%) were recorded. The all-cause death rate was 32%. There were no differences in the risk of MACE between frailty groups, but patients with frailty had an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR<sub>adj</sub>, 1.95 [1.02-3.75]; P = .046).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LM-PCI in older adults with multiple associated comorbidities could be considered a feasible option in this special population. The rate of MACE at follow-up was acceptable. Frailty was associated with a worse prognosis in terms of all-cause mortality at follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":34295,"journal":{"name":"REC Interventional Cardiology","volume":"7 1","pages":"6-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12097336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC Interventional Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/RECIC.M24000471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: In elderly and frail patients, there is limited evidence on the therapeutic management of left main coronary artery (LM) disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate mid-term clinical outcomes in older adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of LM.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including all older patients (≥ 75 years) undergoing LM-PCI at a high-volume center between 2017 and 2021. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Patients were grouped according to the presence of frailty based on the FRAIL scale. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for clinical differences between the 2 groups.

Results: A total of 140 patients were included in the study (median age 80 [78-84]; 36% women). Of them, 49% met the criteria for frailty. After a median follow-up of 19 [5-35] months, 40 MACE (29%) were recorded. The all-cause death rate was 32%. There were no differences in the risk of MACE between frailty groups, but patients with frailty had an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HRadj, 1.95 [1.02-3.75]; P = .046).

Conclusions: LM-PCI in older adults with multiple associated comorbidities could be considered a feasible option in this special population. The rate of MACE at follow-up was acceptable. Frailty was associated with a worse prognosis in terms of all-cause mortality at follow-up.

老年人冠状动脉左主干的经皮治疗。虚弱对中期结果的影响[]。
简介和目的:在老年和体弱患者中,关于左主干冠状动脉(LM)疾病的治疗管理证据有限。本研究的目的是评估老年人经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的中期临床结果。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,包括2017年至2021年间在大容量中心接受LM-PCI治疗的所有老年患者(≥75岁)。主要终点是主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的综合。根据虚弱程度对患者进行分组。采用治疗加权的逆概率来解释两组之间的临床差异。结果:共纳入140例患者(中位年龄80岁[78-84];36%的女性)。其中,49%的人符合虚弱的标准。中位随访19[5-35]个月,记录MACE 40例(29%)。全因死亡率为32%。虚弱组间MACE风险无差异,但虚弱患者全因死亡风险增加(HRadj, 1.95 [1.02-3.75];P = .046)。结论:对于有多种相关合并症的老年人,LM-PCI可以被认为是这一特殊人群的可行选择。随访时MACE率可接受。在随访的全因死亡率方面,虚弱与较差的预后相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
REC Interventional Cardiology
REC Interventional Cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
87
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信