[Cost-effectiveness analysis of radiofrequency renal denervation for uncontrolled hypertension in Spain].

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
REC Interventional Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.24875/RECIC.M24000478
Oriol Rodríguez-Leor, Anne M Ryschon, Khoa N Cao, Fernando Jaén-Águila, Tamara García-Camarero, Carlos Mansilla-Morales, Michael Kolovetsios, María Álvarez-Orozco, José Antonio García-Donaire, Jan B Pietzsch
{"title":"[Cost-effectiveness analysis of radiofrequency renal denervation for uncontrolled hypertension in Spain].","authors":"Oriol Rodríguez-Leor, Anne M Ryschon, Khoa N Cao, Fernando Jaén-Águila, Tamara García-Camarero, Carlos Mansilla-Morales, Michael Kolovetsios, María Álvarez-Orozco, José Antonio García-Donaire, Jan B Pietzsch","doi":"10.24875/RECIC.M24000478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Radiofrequency (RF) renal denervation (RDN) has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with uncontrolled hypertension. This analysis sought to explore the cost-effectiveness of this therapy in Spain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A decision-analytic Markov model projected clinical events, quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and costs over the patients' lifetime. Treatment effectiveness in the base case analysis was informed by the change in office systolic blood pressure observed in the full cohort of the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial (-4.9 mmHg vs sham control). Alternate scenarios were calculated for effect sizes reported in the HTN-ON MED subcohort of patients on 3 antihypertensive medications treated outside the United States, the HTN-OFF MED trial, and the Global SYMPLICITY Registry high-risk and very high-risk cohorts. The analysis was conducted from the Spanish National Health System perspective and a willingness-to-pay a threshold of 25000 per QALY gained was considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RF RDN therapy resulted in clinical event reductions (10-year relative risk 0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for myocardial infarction, and 0.72 for heart failure) and a lifetime gain of 0.35 (13.99 vs 13.63) QALYs. Incremental lifetime costs were 5335 (26 381 vs 21 045), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 15 057 per QALY gained. Cost-effectiveness was further improved among all the other clinical evidence scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study suggest that RF RDN can provide a cost-effective alternative in the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension in Spain.</p>","PeriodicalId":34295,"journal":{"name":"REC Interventional Cardiology","volume":"6 4","pages":"305-312"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12097359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC Interventional Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/RECIC.M24000478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Radiofrequency (RF) renal denervation (RDN) has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with uncontrolled hypertension. This analysis sought to explore the cost-effectiveness of this therapy in Spain.

Methods: A decision-analytic Markov model projected clinical events, quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and costs over the patients' lifetime. Treatment effectiveness in the base case analysis was informed by the change in office systolic blood pressure observed in the full cohort of the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial (-4.9 mmHg vs sham control). Alternate scenarios were calculated for effect sizes reported in the HTN-ON MED subcohort of patients on 3 antihypertensive medications treated outside the United States, the HTN-OFF MED trial, and the Global SYMPLICITY Registry high-risk and very high-risk cohorts. The analysis was conducted from the Spanish National Health System perspective and a willingness-to-pay a threshold of 25000 per QALY gained was considered.

Results: RF RDN therapy resulted in clinical event reductions (10-year relative risk 0.80 for stroke, 0.88 for myocardial infarction, and 0.72 for heart failure) and a lifetime gain of 0.35 (13.99 vs 13.63) QALYs. Incremental lifetime costs were 5335 (26 381 vs 21 045), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 15 057 per QALY gained. Cost-effectiveness was further improved among all the other clinical evidence scenarios.

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that RF RDN can provide a cost-effective alternative in the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension in Spain.

[西班牙射频肾去神经治疗未控制高血压的成本-效果分析]。
简介和目的:射频(RF)肾去神经支配(RDN)已被证明是一种安全有效的治疗高血压患者的选择。本分析旨在探讨该疗法在西班牙的成本效益。方法:采用决策分析马尔可夫模型预测患者一生中的临床事件、质量调整生命年(QALY)和成本。基本病例分析中的治疗效果是通过在SPYRAL HTN-ON MED试验的全队列中观察到的收缩压变化(与假对照组相比-4.9 mmHg)来确定的。对在美国以外接受3种降压药物治疗的患者的HTN-ON MED亚队列、HTN-OFF MED试验和Global SYMPLICITY Registry高风险和非常高风险队列中报告的效应量进行了不同情况的计算。分析是从西班牙国家卫生系统的角度进行的,并考虑了每获得QALY 25,000的支付意愿阈值。结果:RF RDN治疗导致临床事件减少(卒中的10年相对危险度为0.80,心肌梗死的10年相对危险度为0.88,心力衰竭的10年相对危险度为0.72),终生增益为0.35 (13.99 vs 13.63) QALYs。增量生命周期成本为5335 (26381 vs 21045),每获得QALY的增量成本效益比为15057。在所有其他临床证据情景下,成本-效果进一步提高。结论:本研究的结果表明,RF RDN可以为西班牙不受控制的高血压提供一种经济有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
REC Interventional Cardiology
REC Interventional Cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
87
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信