{"title":"Trauma and Disfigurement: Psychosocial Impact and Ethical Reflections on esthetic Normalization in Medicine.","authors":"Gaia Calcini","doi":"10.1177/00243639251334426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present article examines the psychological repercussions and ethical challenges associated with the medical treatment of disfigurement, highlighting how such interventions, while essential for physical recovery, can have significant impacts on personal identity and the psychosocial wellbeing of patients. In particular, it discusses the psychological trauma stemming from the condition of disfigurement and the complex dynamics of stigmatization and discrimination that follow. The analysis also focuses on the tendency of modern medicine to promote esthetic normalization, emphasizing how such medical treatments, although often necessary for physical recovery, raise profound questions about self-determination, individual freedom, and respect for human diversity. Through a critical examination of contemporary medical practices, the text discusses how the pressure toward esthetic normalization can negatively influence personal identity and the social perception of individuals affected by disfigurement. It argues that the prevailing medical approach, focused on physical correction, may not only limit esthetic diversity but also perpetuate stereotypes and discrimination. It highlights how academic literature and artistic practices offer alternative paradigms that value the uniqueness and authenticity of the human body, proposing a more inclusive and less conformist vision of physical and psychological wellbeing. The work of artists like Laura Ferguson and Mark Gilbert, along with theorizations by philosophers like Michel Foucault, provides a critical perspective on dominant cultural norms and suggests new ways of thinking about and treating disfigurement, emphasizing the importance of an approach that respects individual freedom and celebrates bodily diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":44238,"journal":{"name":"Linacre Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"00243639251334426"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linacre Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639251334426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present article examines the psychological repercussions and ethical challenges associated with the medical treatment of disfigurement, highlighting how such interventions, while essential for physical recovery, can have significant impacts on personal identity and the psychosocial wellbeing of patients. In particular, it discusses the psychological trauma stemming from the condition of disfigurement and the complex dynamics of stigmatization and discrimination that follow. The analysis also focuses on the tendency of modern medicine to promote esthetic normalization, emphasizing how such medical treatments, although often necessary for physical recovery, raise profound questions about self-determination, individual freedom, and respect for human diversity. Through a critical examination of contemporary medical practices, the text discusses how the pressure toward esthetic normalization can negatively influence personal identity and the social perception of individuals affected by disfigurement. It argues that the prevailing medical approach, focused on physical correction, may not only limit esthetic diversity but also perpetuate stereotypes and discrimination. It highlights how academic literature and artistic practices offer alternative paradigms that value the uniqueness and authenticity of the human body, proposing a more inclusive and less conformist vision of physical and psychological wellbeing. The work of artists like Laura Ferguson and Mark Gilbert, along with theorizations by philosophers like Michel Foucault, provides a critical perspective on dominant cultural norms and suggests new ways of thinking about and treating disfigurement, emphasizing the importance of an approach that respects individual freedom and celebrates bodily diversity.