Trauma and Disfigurement: Psychosocial Impact and Ethical Reflections on esthetic Normalization in Medicine.

IF 0.4 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS
Gaia Calcini
{"title":"Trauma and Disfigurement: Psychosocial Impact and Ethical Reflections on esthetic Normalization in Medicine.","authors":"Gaia Calcini","doi":"10.1177/00243639251334426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present article examines the psychological repercussions and ethical challenges associated with the medical treatment of disfigurement, highlighting how such interventions, while essential for physical recovery, can have significant impacts on personal identity and the psychosocial wellbeing of patients. In particular, it discusses the psychological trauma stemming from the condition of disfigurement and the complex dynamics of stigmatization and discrimination that follow. The analysis also focuses on the tendency of modern medicine to promote esthetic normalization, emphasizing how such medical treatments, although often necessary for physical recovery, raise profound questions about self-determination, individual freedom, and respect for human diversity. Through a critical examination of contemporary medical practices, the text discusses how the pressure toward esthetic normalization can negatively influence personal identity and the social perception of individuals affected by disfigurement. It argues that the prevailing medical approach, focused on physical correction, may not only limit esthetic diversity but also perpetuate stereotypes and discrimination. It highlights how academic literature and artistic practices offer alternative paradigms that value the uniqueness and authenticity of the human body, proposing a more inclusive and less conformist vision of physical and psychological wellbeing. The work of artists like Laura Ferguson and Mark Gilbert, along with theorizations by philosophers like Michel Foucault, provides a critical perspective on dominant cultural norms and suggests new ways of thinking about and treating disfigurement, emphasizing the importance of an approach that respects individual freedom and celebrates bodily diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":44238,"journal":{"name":"Linacre Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"00243639251334426"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12095215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linacre Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639251334426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present article examines the psychological repercussions and ethical challenges associated with the medical treatment of disfigurement, highlighting how such interventions, while essential for physical recovery, can have significant impacts on personal identity and the psychosocial wellbeing of patients. In particular, it discusses the psychological trauma stemming from the condition of disfigurement and the complex dynamics of stigmatization and discrimination that follow. The analysis also focuses on the tendency of modern medicine to promote esthetic normalization, emphasizing how such medical treatments, although often necessary for physical recovery, raise profound questions about self-determination, individual freedom, and respect for human diversity. Through a critical examination of contemporary medical practices, the text discusses how the pressure toward esthetic normalization can negatively influence personal identity and the social perception of individuals affected by disfigurement. It argues that the prevailing medical approach, focused on physical correction, may not only limit esthetic diversity but also perpetuate stereotypes and discrimination. It highlights how academic literature and artistic practices offer alternative paradigms that value the uniqueness and authenticity of the human body, proposing a more inclusive and less conformist vision of physical and psychological wellbeing. The work of artists like Laura Ferguson and Mark Gilbert, along with theorizations by philosophers like Michel Foucault, provides a critical perspective on dominant cultural norms and suggests new ways of thinking about and treating disfigurement, emphasizing the importance of an approach that respects individual freedom and celebrates bodily diversity.

创伤与毁容:医学审美正常化的社会心理影响与伦理反思。
本文探讨了与毁容的医学治疗相关的心理影响和伦理挑战,强调了这些干预措施虽然对身体恢复至关重要,但如何对患者的个人身份和社会心理健康产生重大影响。特别是,它讨论了心理创伤源于毁容的条件和复杂的动态污名化和歧视。分析还侧重于现代医学促进审美正常化的趋势,强调这种医学治疗虽然往往是身体恢复所必需的,但如何提出有关自决、个人自由和尊重人类多样性的深刻问题。通过对当代医学实践的批判性检查,本文讨论了审美正常化的压力如何对个人身份和受毁容影响的个人的社会感知产生负面影响。它认为,以身体矫正为重点的现行医疗方法不仅可能限制审美多样性,而且可能使陈规定型观念和歧视永久化。它强调了学术文学和艺术实践如何提供了另一种范式,这些范式重视人体的独特性和真实性,提出了一种更具包容性和更少因循守旧的身心健康愿景。劳拉·弗格森(Laura Ferguson)和马克·吉尔伯特(Mark Gilbert)等艺术家的作品,以及米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)等哲学家的理论,为主流文化规范提供了一种批判性的视角,并提出了思考和治疗毁容的新方法,强调了尊重个人自由和庆祝身体多样性的方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Linacre Quarterly
Linacre Quarterly MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信