Xiang Wang, Jie Huang, Chen Xu, Lili Zhang, Jieakesu Su, Jia Liu, Licheng Shen, Lijuan Luan, Yingyong Hou
{"title":"FGFR3 amplification is predictive of poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.","authors":"Xiang Wang, Jie Huang, Chen Xu, Lili Zhang, Jieakesu Su, Jia Liu, Licheng Shen, Lijuan Luan, Yingyong Hou","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03884-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identification and verification of clinically actionable molecular variations to refine currently adopted risk-stratified treatment strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is urgently needed. Here, we evaluated FGFR3 amplification status by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) performed on tissue microarrays and its prognostic value in 526 ESCC patients. FGFR3 amplification was found in 3.0% (16/526) of ESCC patients enrolled in this study cohort. Intratumor heterogeneity and metastatic heterogeneity of FGFR3 amplification were found in 10% (2/20) and 40% (2/5) FGFR3 amplified ESCC cases, respectively. No statistically significant associations were found between FGFR3 amplification status and common clinicopathological features. Survival analyses demonstrated that FGFR3 amplification was associated with a worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (DFS, P = 0.008; OS, P = 0.027). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that invasive depth was significantly associated with DFS (P = 0.001, HR: 1.498, 95% CI: 1.172-1.914) and OS (P = 0.002, HR: 1.482, 95% CI: 1.159-1.894), and FGFR3 amplification was significantly associated with DFS (P = 0.020, HR: 2.065, 95% CI: 1.120-3.808) and tend to associate with OS (P = 0.070, HR: 1.756, 95% CI: 0.954-3.233). Furthermore, when patients were stratified into stage I-II group and stage III-IV group, the adverse effect of FGFR3 amplification on prognosis was presented in stage III-IV patients (DFS, P = 0.0047; OS, P = 0.029) rather than stage I-II patients (DFS, P = 0.46; OS, P = 0.53), indicating that the prognostic value of FGFR3 amplification may relying on clinical stage. Our findings might provide a better understanding of the FGFR3 amplification status in ESCC patients and add further insights into its potential prognostic value.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":"1153-1164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03884-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Identification and verification of clinically actionable molecular variations to refine currently adopted risk-stratified treatment strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is urgently needed. Here, we evaluated FGFR3 amplification status by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) performed on tissue microarrays and its prognostic value in 526 ESCC patients. FGFR3 amplification was found in 3.0% (16/526) of ESCC patients enrolled in this study cohort. Intratumor heterogeneity and metastatic heterogeneity of FGFR3 amplification were found in 10% (2/20) and 40% (2/5) FGFR3 amplified ESCC cases, respectively. No statistically significant associations were found between FGFR3 amplification status and common clinicopathological features. Survival analyses demonstrated that FGFR3 amplification was associated with a worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (DFS, P = 0.008; OS, P = 0.027). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that invasive depth was significantly associated with DFS (P = 0.001, HR: 1.498, 95% CI: 1.172-1.914) and OS (P = 0.002, HR: 1.482, 95% CI: 1.159-1.894), and FGFR3 amplification was significantly associated with DFS (P = 0.020, HR: 2.065, 95% CI: 1.120-3.808) and tend to associate with OS (P = 0.070, HR: 1.756, 95% CI: 0.954-3.233). Furthermore, when patients were stratified into stage I-II group and stage III-IV group, the adverse effect of FGFR3 amplification on prognosis was presented in stage III-IV patients (DFS, P = 0.0047; OS, P = 0.029) rather than stage I-II patients (DFS, P = 0.46; OS, P = 0.53), indicating that the prognostic value of FGFR3 amplification may relying on clinical stage. Our findings might provide a better understanding of the FGFR3 amplification status in ESCC patients and add further insights into its potential prognostic value.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.