Use of the Allium stent for management of ureteral pathology: A real-world clinical practice study.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Jorge Panach-Navarrete, Lorena Valls-González, Marcos Antonio Lloret-Durà, Lucas Diéguez-Álvarez, José María Martínez-Jabaloyas
{"title":"Use of the Allium stent for management of ureteral pathology: A real-world clinical practice study.","authors":"Jorge Panach-Navarrete, Lorena Valls-González, Marcos Antonio Lloret-Durà, Lucas Diéguez-Álvarez, José María Martínez-Jabaloyas","doi":"10.1177/03915603251341399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of the present study was to carry out a real-world clinical practice study, verifying through prospective analysis whether the Allium stent could resolve different types of ureteral pathologies, with strictures of different etiology and cases of urine leakage.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Prospective observational study collecting all cases of Allium ureteral stent placement in our center between 2021 and 2022. Descriptive and comparative analyses were carried out to verify the success rate of Allium stents and pinpoint patient profiles in whom stent implantation would provide effective resolution of stricture or leakage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 Allium stent cases were collected in 30 patients, 10 of which were considered successful procedures (eight cases of stricture and two leakage) while 20 were classed as failures (15 stricture and five ureterointestinal urine leakage). The most frequent pathology was ureterointestinal stricture (33.3%) in patients with an ileal conduit, followed by retroperitoneal fibrosis (26.7%) and ureterointestinal urine leakage (16.7%). Furthermore, up to 40% of the sample had an infectious complication 1 month after stent implantation, while the most common cause of failure was persistent hydronephrosis (36.7%). Notably, only two of the 10 ureterointestinal stricture cases and one of the five cases of ureterointestinal urine leakage were resolved with the stent. Furthermore, a statistically significant relationship was found between the indication of the stent and its success: specifically, all cases of poor tolerance to DJ stents and ureteral urine leakage were resolved (OR: 12.66) with the Allium stent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The resolution rate of ureteral pathology with the Allium stent is relatively low. The patients who can benefit the most from this device are those with ureteral urine leakage or poor tolerance to the DJ stent. Among the possible complications, urinary infection in the first month after implantation is the most common.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3915603251341399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603251341399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of the present study was to carry out a real-world clinical practice study, verifying through prospective analysis whether the Allium stent could resolve different types of ureteral pathologies, with strictures of different etiology and cases of urine leakage.

Material and methods: Prospective observational study collecting all cases of Allium ureteral stent placement in our center between 2021 and 2022. Descriptive and comparative analyses were carried out to verify the success rate of Allium stents and pinpoint patient profiles in whom stent implantation would provide effective resolution of stricture or leakage.

Results: A total of 30 Allium stent cases were collected in 30 patients, 10 of which were considered successful procedures (eight cases of stricture and two leakage) while 20 were classed as failures (15 stricture and five ureterointestinal urine leakage). The most frequent pathology was ureterointestinal stricture (33.3%) in patients with an ileal conduit, followed by retroperitoneal fibrosis (26.7%) and ureterointestinal urine leakage (16.7%). Furthermore, up to 40% of the sample had an infectious complication 1 month after stent implantation, while the most common cause of failure was persistent hydronephrosis (36.7%). Notably, only two of the 10 ureterointestinal stricture cases and one of the five cases of ureterointestinal urine leakage were resolved with the stent. Furthermore, a statistically significant relationship was found between the indication of the stent and its success: specifically, all cases of poor tolerance to DJ stents and ureteral urine leakage were resolved (OR: 12.66) with the Allium stent.

Conclusions: The resolution rate of ureteral pathology with the Allium stent is relatively low. The patients who can benefit the most from this device are those with ureteral urine leakage or poor tolerance to the DJ stent. Among the possible complications, urinary infection in the first month after implantation is the most common.

使用葱支架治疗输尿管病理:一项真实世界的临床实践研究。
前言:本研究的目的是进行真实世界的临床实践研究,通过前瞻性分析验证Allium支架是否可以解决不同类型的输尿管病变,不同病因的狭窄和尿漏病例。材料与方法:前瞻性观察研究,收集本中心2021 - 2022年间所有输尿管内大蒜支架置入术病例。我们进行了描述性和对比性分析,以验证Allium支架的成功率,并确定支架植入可有效解决狭窄或渗漏的患者概况。结果:30例患者共收集葱支架30例,其中成功10例(狭窄8例,渗漏2例),失败20例(狭窄15例,输尿管肠内尿漏5例)。回肠导管患者最常见的病理是输尿管肠狭窄(33.3%),其次是腹膜后纤维化(26.7%)和输尿管肠尿漏(16.7%)。此外,高达40%的样本在支架植入1个月后出现感染性并发症,而最常见的失败原因是持续性肾积水(36.7%)。值得注意的是,10例输尿管肠狭窄病例中仅有2例,5例输尿管肠尿漏病例中仅有1例采用支架解决。此外,发现支架的适应症与支架的成功之间存在统计学意义的关系:具体而言,所有对DJ支架耐受不良和输尿管尿漏的病例都通过Allium支架得到解决(OR: 12.66)。结论:Allium支架输尿管病理清除率较低。输尿管漏尿或对DJ支架耐受性差的患者可以从该装置中获益最多。在可能出现的并发症中,以植入后第一个月的尿路感染最为常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信