The effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on lower limb motor function and balance in patients with chronic stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2025-05-26 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13391
Qing Cai, Xuan Zhang, Guirong Liu, Yanzhi Cai, Jing Luo, Mingyu Yin, Haiqing Zheng
{"title":"The effects of repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation combined with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on lower limb motor function and balance in patients with chronic stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Qing Cai, Xuan Zhang, Guirong Liu, Yanzhi Cai, Jing Luo, Mingyu Yin, Haiqing Zheng","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the chronic phase of stroke, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) exhibits limited effectiveness in improving motor recovery due to reduced brain plasticity. Patients with chronic stroke also typically present with lower limb motor dysfunction and disability. Recent studies suggest that repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) can promote brain plasticity and potentially offer additional improvement in patients with chronic stroke.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether combining a designed rPMS program with rTMS could further improve lower limb motor function, mobility, and balance function in patients with chronic stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Two-arm randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Inpatient clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>20 patients with chronic stroke with lower limb hemiparesis were recruited.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>One group received ipsilateral rTMS, and the other received rTMS and rPMS designed based on the lower limb myofascial chain and neural pathways.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome measure was the lower extremity motor section of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-LE), evaluating lower limb motor function. Secondary outcomes included the timed up and go test (TUG), the 10-meter walking test (10MWT), the 6-minute walking test (6MWT), Berg balance scale (BBS), and parameters measured by the balance training and evaluation system (Rx, mediolateral sway; Ry, anteroposterior sway; and RecArea, total sway area). All outcome assessments were conducted at baseline, 2 weeks post intervention, and 4 weeks post intervention. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was then performed to analyze any group differences over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant interaction effect between time and group for FMA-LE (p = .001), 6MWT (p < .001), TUG (p = .015), BBS (p = .046), Rx (p = .008), Ry (p = .009), and RecArea (p < .001). Effect size (the value of partial ɳ<sup>2</sup>) of FMA-LE was 0.40.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides evidence that combining rTMS with rPMS may be a more practical approach for improving lower limb motor function, ambulation, and balance in patients with chronic stroke compared to rTMS alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13391","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the chronic phase of stroke, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) exhibits limited effectiveness in improving motor recovery due to reduced brain plasticity. Patients with chronic stroke also typically present with lower limb motor dysfunction and disability. Recent studies suggest that repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) can promote brain plasticity and potentially offer additional improvement in patients with chronic stroke.

Objective: To investigate whether combining a designed rPMS program with rTMS could further improve lower limb motor function, mobility, and balance function in patients with chronic stroke.

Design: Two-arm randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Inpatient clinic.

Participants: 20 patients with chronic stroke with lower limb hemiparesis were recruited.

Interventions: One group received ipsilateral rTMS, and the other received rTMS and rPMS designed based on the lower limb myofascial chain and neural pathways.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measure was the lower extremity motor section of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-LE), evaluating lower limb motor function. Secondary outcomes included the timed up and go test (TUG), the 10-meter walking test (10MWT), the 6-minute walking test (6MWT), Berg balance scale (BBS), and parameters measured by the balance training and evaluation system (Rx, mediolateral sway; Ry, anteroposterior sway; and RecArea, total sway area). All outcome assessments were conducted at baseline, 2 weeks post intervention, and 4 weeks post intervention. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was then performed to analyze any group differences over time.

Results: Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant interaction effect between time and group for FMA-LE (p = .001), 6MWT (p < .001), TUG (p = .015), BBS (p = .046), Rx (p = .008), Ry (p = .009), and RecArea (p < .001). Effect size (the value of partial ɳ2) of FMA-LE was 0.40.

Conclusions: This study provides evidence that combining rTMS with rPMS may be a more practical approach for improving lower limb motor function, ambulation, and balance in patients with chronic stroke compared to rTMS alone.

重复性外周磁刺激联合重复性经颅磁刺激对慢性脑卒中患者下肢运动功能和平衡的影响:一项随机对照试验。
背景:在脑卒中的慢性期,重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)在改善运动恢复方面的效果有限,因为大脑可塑性降低。慢性中风患者通常还表现为下肢运动功能障碍和残疾。最近的研究表明,重复性外周磁刺激(rPMS)可以促进大脑的可塑性,并可能为慢性中风患者提供额外的改善。目的:探讨设计的rPMS方案联合rTMS是否能进一步改善慢性脑卒中患者的下肢运动功能、活动能力和平衡功能。设计:两组随机对照试验。环境:住院门诊。参与者:20例慢性脑卒中伴下肢偏瘫患者被招募。干预措施:一组采用同侧rTMS,另一组采用基于下肢肌筋膜链和神经通路设计的rTMS和rPMS。主要结局指标:主要结局指标为Fugl-Meyer评估(FMA-LE)的下肢运动部分,评估下肢运动功能。次要结果包括起跑计时测试(TUG)、10米步行测试(10MWT)、6分钟步行测试(6MWT)、Berg平衡量表(BBS)以及平衡训练与评价系统(Rx、中外侧摇摆;Ry,前后摇摆;RecArea,总摆动面积)。所有结果评估均在基线、干预后2周和干预后4周进行。然后进行双向重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)来分析任何组间随时间的差异。结果:双因素方差分析显示FMA-LE在时间和组间有显著交互作用(p = .001), FMA-LE的6MWT (p 2)为0.40。结论:本研究提供的证据表明,与单独rTMS相比,rTMS联合rPMS可能是改善慢性卒中患者下肢运动功能、行走和平衡的更实用的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信