Methodological Challenges in Deep Learning-Based Detection of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.2 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurointervention Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-26 DOI:10.5469/neuroint.2025.00283
Bio Joo
{"title":"Methodological Challenges in Deep Learning-Based Detection of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Bio Joo","doi":"10.5469/neuroint.2025.00283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, has demonstrated high diagnostic performance in detecting intracranial aneurysms on computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). However, the clinical translation of these technologies remains limited due to methodological limitations and concerns about generalizability. This scoping review comprehensively evaluates 36 studies that applied deep learning to intracranial aneurysm detection on CTA or MRA, focusing on study design, validation strategies, reporting practices, and reference standards. Key findings include inconsistent handling of ruptured and previously treated aneurysms, underreporting of coexisting brain or vascular abnormalities, limited use of external validation, and an almost complete absence of prospective study designs. Only a minority of studies employed diagnostic cohorts that reflect real-world aneurysm prevalence, and few reported all essential performance metrics, such as patient-wise and lesion-wise sensitivity, specificity, and false positives per case. These limitations suggest that current studies remain at the stage of technical validation, with high risks of bias and limited clinical applicability. To facilitate real-world implementation, future research must adopt more rigorous designs, representative and diverse validation cohorts, standardized reporting practices, and greater attention to human-AI interaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19140,"journal":{"name":"Neurointervention","volume":" ","pages":"52-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12183370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2025.00283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly deep learning, has demonstrated high diagnostic performance in detecting intracranial aneurysms on computed tomography angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). However, the clinical translation of these technologies remains limited due to methodological limitations and concerns about generalizability. This scoping review comprehensively evaluates 36 studies that applied deep learning to intracranial aneurysm detection on CTA or MRA, focusing on study design, validation strategies, reporting practices, and reference standards. Key findings include inconsistent handling of ruptured and previously treated aneurysms, underreporting of coexisting brain or vascular abnormalities, limited use of external validation, and an almost complete absence of prospective study designs. Only a minority of studies employed diagnostic cohorts that reflect real-world aneurysm prevalence, and few reported all essential performance metrics, such as patient-wise and lesion-wise sensitivity, specificity, and false positives per case. These limitations suggest that current studies remain at the stage of technical validation, with high risks of bias and limited clinical applicability. To facilitate real-world implementation, future research must adopt more rigorous designs, representative and diverse validation cohorts, standardized reporting practices, and greater attention to human-AI interaction.

基于深度学习的颅内动脉瘤检测的方法学挑战:范围综述。
人工智能(AI),特别是深度学习,在通过计算机断层血管造影(CTA)和磁共振血管造影(MRA)检测颅内动脉瘤方面表现出了很高的诊断性能。然而,由于方法学的限制和对普遍性的担忧,这些技术的临床翻译仍然有限。本综述综合评价了36项将深度学习应用于颅内动脉瘤CTA或MRA检测的研究,重点关注研究设计、验证策略、报告实践和参考标准。主要发现包括对破裂动脉瘤和先前治疗过的动脉瘤的处理不一致,对共存的脑或血管异常的少报,外部验证的有限使用,以及几乎完全缺乏前瞻性研究设计。只有少数研究采用反映真实世界动脉瘤患病率的诊断队列,很少报告所有基本的性能指标,如患者和病变敏感性、特异性和每个病例的假阳性。这些局限性表明,目前的研究仍处于技术验证阶段,存在较高的偏倚风险,临床适用性有限。为了促进现实世界的实施,未来的研究必须采用更严格的设计,具有代表性和多样化的验证队列,标准化的报告实践,以及更多地关注人类与人工智能的互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信