Variation in Mechanical Properties of 5.5 mm Cobalt Chromium and Titanium Spinal Rods Across Suppliers.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Vidyadhar V Upasani, Dylan G Kluck, Christine L Farnsworth, Naman U Shah, Burt Yaszay, Jason P Caffrey, Peter O Newton
{"title":"Variation in Mechanical Properties of 5.5 mm Cobalt Chromium and Titanium Spinal Rods Across Suppliers.","authors":"Vidyadhar V Upasani, Dylan G Kluck, Christine L Farnsworth, Naman U Shah, Burt Yaszay, Jason P Caffrey, Peter O Newton","doi":"10.1002/jor.26107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cobalt chromium (CoCr) and titanium (Ti) alloys are popular spinal rod choices due to biocompatibility, less imaging artifact than stainless steel, and greater corrosion resistance. This study assesses the mechanical behavior in bending of commercially available 5.5 mm diameter CoCr and Ti spinal rods in a four-point bending configuration. For each supplier, rod segments were loaded to 20 mm of deflection with continuous load and displacement recording. Rod mechanical properties were calculated. Suppliers were compared by ANOVA, with post hoc pairwise comparisons. For CoCr rods, flexural modulus and flexural stiffness varied across suppliers with maximum differences of 18.0 GPa and 47.0 N/mm, respectively, representing 11% and 15% variation. Range for CoCr rod yield load was 780-1004 N (29% variation), yield displacement was 2.3-2.8 mm, elastic displacement was 2.2-2.7 mm, and maximum load was 1791-2181 N, representing 22% variation. For Ti rods, flexural modulus and flexural stiffness varied across suppliers with maximum differences of 7.3 GPa and 24.3 N/mm, respectively, representing 9% and 14% variation. Range for Ti rod yield load was 1054-1207 N (14% variation), yield displacement was 5.9-7.0 mm, elastic displacement was 5.8-6.9 mm, and maximum load was 1515-1678 N, representing 11% variation. There is substantial variation in mechanical behavior in bending of CoCr and Ti rods (5.5 mm diameter) amongst suppliers, suggesting that they are not mechanically equivalent. Surgeons must ensure that the mechanical properties of a particular rod meet the requirements of the surgical correction required.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cobalt chromium (CoCr) and titanium (Ti) alloys are popular spinal rod choices due to biocompatibility, less imaging artifact than stainless steel, and greater corrosion resistance. This study assesses the mechanical behavior in bending of commercially available 5.5 mm diameter CoCr and Ti spinal rods in a four-point bending configuration. For each supplier, rod segments were loaded to 20 mm of deflection with continuous load and displacement recording. Rod mechanical properties were calculated. Suppliers were compared by ANOVA, with post hoc pairwise comparisons. For CoCr rods, flexural modulus and flexural stiffness varied across suppliers with maximum differences of 18.0 GPa and 47.0 N/mm, respectively, representing 11% and 15% variation. Range for CoCr rod yield load was 780-1004 N (29% variation), yield displacement was 2.3-2.8 mm, elastic displacement was 2.2-2.7 mm, and maximum load was 1791-2181 N, representing 22% variation. For Ti rods, flexural modulus and flexural stiffness varied across suppliers with maximum differences of 7.3 GPa and 24.3 N/mm, respectively, representing 9% and 14% variation. Range for Ti rod yield load was 1054-1207 N (14% variation), yield displacement was 5.9-7.0 mm, elastic displacement was 5.8-6.9 mm, and maximum load was 1515-1678 N, representing 11% variation. There is substantial variation in mechanical behavior in bending of CoCr and Ti rods (5.5 mm diameter) amongst suppliers, suggesting that they are not mechanically equivalent. Surgeons must ensure that the mechanical properties of a particular rod meet the requirements of the surgical correction required.

不同供应商5.5 mm钴铬和钛脊柱棒机械性能的差异。
钴铬(CoCr)和钛(Ti)合金是受欢迎的脊柱棒选择,因为它们具有生物相容性,比不锈钢更少的成像伪影,以及更强的耐腐蚀性。本研究评估了市售5.5 mm直径的CoCr和Ti脊柱棒在四点弯曲配置下的弯曲力学行为。对于每个供应商,杆段加载到20mm的挠度,并连续记录负载和位移。计算了杆的力学性能。供应商的比较采用方差分析和事后两两比较。对于CoCr棒,不同供应商的弯曲模量和弯曲刚度差异最大,分别为18.0 GPa和47.0 N/mm,差异为11%和15%。CoCr杆屈服载荷范围为780 ~ 1004 N(变化幅度为29%),屈服位移范围为2.3 ~ 2.8 mm,弹性位移范围为2.2 ~ 2.7 mm,最大载荷范围为1791 ~ 2181 N,变化幅度为22%。对于钛棒,不同供应商的弯曲模量和弯曲刚度差异最大,分别为7.3 GPa和24.3 N/mm,差异为9%和14%。钛棒屈服载荷范围为1054 ~ 1207 N,变化幅度为14%,屈服位移范围为5.9 ~ 7.0 mm,弹性位移范围为5.8 ~ 6.9 mm,最大载荷范围为1515 ~ 1678 N,变化幅度为11%。不同供应商之间CoCr和Ti棒(直径5.5 mm)的弯曲力学行为存在很大差异,这表明它们在机械上并不等同。外科医生必须确保特定棒的机械性能满足手术矫正所需的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信