Needs and Wishes Towards Sex- and Gender-Sensitive Chronic Pain Management: A Qualitative Study with German General Practitioners.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-05-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S522497
Alexandra Piotrowski, Alexandra Schmidt, Natalie Seuken, Lia Goldberg, Neele Kufeld, Christine Kersting, Veronika Bencheva, Petra Thürmann, Achim Mortsiefer
{"title":"Needs and Wishes Towards Sex- and Gender-Sensitive Chronic Pain Management: A Qualitative Study with German General Practitioners.","authors":"Alexandra Piotrowski, Alexandra Schmidt, Natalie Seuken, Lia Goldberg, Neele Kufeld, Christine Kersting, Veronika Bencheva, Petra Thürmann, Achim Mortsiefer","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S522497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study is part of the GESCO feasibility project (funded by the German Federal Ministry of Health) aimed at developing a sex- and gender-sensitive primary care intervention for patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) receiving long-term opioid therapy (LTOT). To inform the intervention design, we explored general practitioners' (GPs) experiences and needs in managing this patient group, with a particular focus on the role of sex and gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with five GPs in Germany using a convenience sample. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the Rapid approach to integrate findings quickly into the broader project.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treating patients with CNCP and LTOT is highly complex and emotionally demanding. GPs described feeling caught between patients' high expectations and their own limitations, which often strained therapeutic relationships. Gender dynamics played a key role in shaping these interactions. While male GPs emphasized neutrality, underlying gender stereotypes still influenced their behavior. Female GPs reported stronger trust with female patients, while male GPs described a greater focus on asserting control. Stigmatization-especially affecting female patients-was reported to hinder open communication and trust. GPs expressed the need for more time, better training in gender-sensitive care, and stronger interdisciplinary collaboration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To improve care for patients with CNCP and LTOT, recommendations include: extending consultation times with adequate reimbursement, ensuring comprehensive medical histories, enhancing GP training in gender-sensitive care, improving diagnostic tools, and promoting peer collaboration. Further measures involve supporting patient self-management, empathy, and communication, as well as adopting a biopsychosocial and sex- and gender-sensitive approach to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"2567-2581"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12103195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S522497","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study is part of the GESCO feasibility project (funded by the German Federal Ministry of Health) aimed at developing a sex- and gender-sensitive primary care intervention for patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) receiving long-term opioid therapy (LTOT). To inform the intervention design, we explored general practitioners' (GPs) experiences and needs in managing this patient group, with a particular focus on the role of sex and gender.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with five GPs in Germany using a convenience sample. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using the Rapid approach to integrate findings quickly into the broader project.

Results: Treating patients with CNCP and LTOT is highly complex and emotionally demanding. GPs described feeling caught between patients' high expectations and their own limitations, which often strained therapeutic relationships. Gender dynamics played a key role in shaping these interactions. While male GPs emphasized neutrality, underlying gender stereotypes still influenced their behavior. Female GPs reported stronger trust with female patients, while male GPs described a greater focus on asserting control. Stigmatization-especially affecting female patients-was reported to hinder open communication and trust. GPs expressed the need for more time, better training in gender-sensitive care, and stronger interdisciplinary collaboration.

Conclusion: To improve care for patients with CNCP and LTOT, recommendations include: extending consultation times with adequate reimbursement, ensuring comprehensive medical histories, enhancing GP training in gender-sensitive care, improving diagnostic tools, and promoting peer collaboration. Further measures involve supporting patient self-management, empathy, and communication, as well as adopting a biopsychosocial and sex- and gender-sensitive approach to treatment.

对性别和性别敏感慢性疼痛管理的需求和愿望:德国全科医生的定性研究。
目的:本研究是GESCO可行性项目(由德国联邦卫生部资助)的一部分,旨在为接受长期阿片类药物治疗(LTOT)的慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)患者开发性别和性别敏感的初级保健干预措施。为了为干预设计提供信息,我们探讨了全科医生(gp)在管理这一患者群体方面的经验和需求,特别关注性别和社会性别的作用。方法:我们对德国的5名全科医生进行了半结构化的电话访谈。访谈被逐字记录下来,并使用Rapid方法进行分析,以便将调查结果快速整合到更广泛的项目中。结果:CNCP合并ltt患者的治疗是高度复杂和情绪化的。全科医生表示,他们在病人的高期望和自己的局限性之间感到进退两难,这往往会使治疗关系紧张。性别动态在形成这些互动方面发挥了关键作用。虽然男性全科医生强调中立,但潜在的性别刻板印象仍然影响着他们的行为。据报道,女性全科医生对女性患者的信任度更高,而男性全科医生则更注重对患者的控制。据报道,污名化——尤其是对女性患者的影响——阻碍了公开的沟通和信任。全科医生表示需要更多时间、更好地培训对性别问题敏感的护理,以及加强跨学科合作。结论:为改善对CNCP和LTOT患者的护理,建议包括:延长就诊时间并提供足够的报销,确保全面的病史,加强对性别敏感护理的全科医生培训,改进诊断工具,促进同行合作。进一步的措施包括支持患者自我管理、移情和沟通,以及采用生物心理社会和对性别和性别敏感的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信