Analyzing Medication Adherence Patterns Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Thi-Qar, Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of Diabetes Research Pub Date : 2025-05-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/jdr/6659722
Adel Gassab Mohammed, Nassar Taha Yaseen, Dheyaa K AlWaeli
{"title":"Analyzing Medication Adherence Patterns Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Thi-Qar, Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Adel Gassab Mohammed, Nassar Taha Yaseen, Dheyaa K AlWaeli","doi":"10.1155/jdr/6659722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research investigates the adherence levels to diabetes treatment among patients and explores the factors influencing adherence, glycemic control, and the occurrence of diabetes-related complications. A cross-sectional study involving 296 diabetes patients was conducted to evaluate their demographic and clinical profiles, treatment strategies, and adherence levels using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). Statistical analyses identified variables affecting adherence and their relationships with glycemic control and complications. The study population comprised 56% men, with an average age of 49.4 years. Obesity was observed in 24.3% of participants, while the median disease duration was 5 years. The average HbA1c level was 8.4%. Microvascular complications were present in 48.6% of patients, and 18.2% experienced macrovascular complications. Most patients were prescribed oral antidiabetic medications (OAD), with 25% receiving insulin therapy. Adherence rates were suboptimal, with only 3.4% achieving good adherence, 30.4% moderate adherence, and 66.2% poor adherence. Men had higher rates of poor adherence compared to women (72.3% vs. 58.5%). Interestingly, adherence was better in patients with a longer disease duration and a higher body mass index (BMI). The study further examined adherence's impact on glycemic outcomes, finding that poor adherence strongly correlated with elevated HbA1c levels. Among individuals with HbA1c ≥ 7%, 70.5% exhibited poor adherence, whereas 40% of patients with good adherence still had suboptimal glycemic control. Conversely, among those with HbA1c < 7%, 24.5% demonstrated poor adherence compared to 40% with good adherence. Random blood sugar (RBS) levels were significantly higher in poorly adherent patients (237 mg/dL) versus those with good adherence (141 mg/dL). Although adherence was not statistically linked to complication prevalence, patients with reported adherence challenges were more prone to both microvascular and macrovascular complications. Different treatment regimens were also analyzed, revealing that sulfonylureas (SUs) were associated with poor adherence (85%), while sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) showed better adherence rates (16.7%). Missed doses were strongly linked to poor glycemic outcomes but had a lesser impact on complication development. These findings underscore the need for individualized strategies to enhance adherence and optimize glycemic control, ultimately reducing diabetes-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15576,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Research","volume":"2025 ","pages":"6659722"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jdr/6659722","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research investigates the adherence levels to diabetes treatment among patients and explores the factors influencing adherence, glycemic control, and the occurrence of diabetes-related complications. A cross-sectional study involving 296 diabetes patients was conducted to evaluate their demographic and clinical profiles, treatment strategies, and adherence levels using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). Statistical analyses identified variables affecting adherence and their relationships with glycemic control and complications. The study population comprised 56% men, with an average age of 49.4 years. Obesity was observed in 24.3% of participants, while the median disease duration was 5 years. The average HbA1c level was 8.4%. Microvascular complications were present in 48.6% of patients, and 18.2% experienced macrovascular complications. Most patients were prescribed oral antidiabetic medications (OAD), with 25% receiving insulin therapy. Adherence rates were suboptimal, with only 3.4% achieving good adherence, 30.4% moderate adherence, and 66.2% poor adherence. Men had higher rates of poor adherence compared to women (72.3% vs. 58.5%). Interestingly, adherence was better in patients with a longer disease duration and a higher body mass index (BMI). The study further examined adherence's impact on glycemic outcomes, finding that poor adherence strongly correlated with elevated HbA1c levels. Among individuals with HbA1c ≥ 7%, 70.5% exhibited poor adherence, whereas 40% of patients with good adherence still had suboptimal glycemic control. Conversely, among those with HbA1c < 7%, 24.5% demonstrated poor adherence compared to 40% with good adherence. Random blood sugar (RBS) levels were significantly higher in poorly adherent patients (237 mg/dL) versus those with good adherence (141 mg/dL). Although adherence was not statistically linked to complication prevalence, patients with reported adherence challenges were more prone to both microvascular and macrovascular complications. Different treatment regimens were also analyzed, revealing that sulfonylureas (SUs) were associated with poor adherence (85%), while sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) showed better adherence rates (16.7%). Missed doses were strongly linked to poor glycemic outcomes but had a lesser impact on complication development. These findings underscore the need for individualized strategies to enhance adherence and optimize glycemic control, ultimately reducing diabetes-related complications.

分析伊拉克Thi-Qar 2型糖尿病患者的药物依从性模式:一项横断面研究
本研究旨在调查糖尿病患者对治疗的依从性,并探讨影响依从性、血糖控制及糖尿病相关并发症发生的因素。采用莫里斯基药物依从性量表(MMAS-8)对296例糖尿病患者进行了横断面研究,以评估他们的人口统计学和临床概况、治疗策略和依从性水平。统计分析确定了影响依从性的变量及其与血糖控制和并发症的关系。研究人群中56%为男性,平均年龄49.4岁。24.3%的参与者肥胖,中位病程为5年。平均HbA1c水平为8.4%。48.6%的患者出现微血管并发症,18.2%的患者出现大血管并发症。大多数患者服用口服降糖药(OAD), 25%的患者接受胰岛素治疗。依从率为次优,只有3.4%达到良好依从性,30.4%达到中等依从性,66.2%达到不良依从性。与女性相比,男性的依从性较差的比例更高(72.3%对58.5%)。有趣的是,疾病持续时间越长、身体质量指数(BMI)越高的患者依从性越好。该研究进一步检查了依从性对血糖结局的影响,发现依从性差与HbA1c水平升高密切相关。在HbA1c≥7%的患者中,70.5%表现出较差的依从性,而40%的良好依从性患者仍未达到最佳血糖控制。相反,在HbA1c < 7%的患者中,24.5%表现为不良依从性,而40%表现为良好依从性。随机血糖(RBS)水平在依从性差的患者(237 mg/dL)明显高于依从性好的患者(141 mg/dL)。虽然依从性与并发症发生率没有统计学上的联系,但报告的依从性挑战的患者更容易出现微血管和大血管并发症。不同的治疗方案也进行了分析,显示磺脲类药物(SUs)的依从性较差(85%),而钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)的依从性较好(16.7%)。漏给剂量与低血糖结果密切相关,但对并发症的发生影响较小。这些发现强调了个性化策略的必要性,以提高依从性和优化血糖控制,最终减少糖尿病相关并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Research
Journal of Diabetes Research ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
152
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Diabetes Research is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The journal welcomes submissions focusing on the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, and prevention of diabetes, as well as associated complications, such as diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信