Redefining Liver Fibrosis Risk Assessment in Indians with Type 2 Diabetes: New FIB-4 Score Cutoff for Optimizing Sequential Assessment with Transient Elastography.

Rajat Deb, Soumik Goswami, Nilanjan Sengupta, Arjun Baidya, Vibhu R Khare, Joydip Datta, Mousumi Das, Debes Ray
{"title":"Redefining Liver Fibrosis Risk Assessment in Indians with Type 2 Diabetes: New FIB-4 Score Cutoff for Optimizing Sequential Assessment with Transient Elastography.","authors":"Rajat Deb, Soumik Goswami, Nilanjan Sengupta, Arjun Baidya, Vibhu R Khare, Joydip Datta, Mousumi Das, Debes Ray","doi":"10.4103/ijem.ijem_457_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Liver fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is strongly related to hepatic and extrahepatic outcomes. Clinically Significant Liver Fibrosis (CSLF) screening using FIB-4 score is mandated in all T2D patients. The existing FIB-4 cutoff of 1.3 is derived from Western studies and could differ for Indians. Hence, we aimed to determine the FIB-4 cutoff to rule out Transient Elastography (TE) proven CSLF among Indians with T2D.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>551 individuals with T2D underwent laboratory tests for FIB-4 calculation and transient elastography (TE) to detect CSLF defined as Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) ≥ 8kPa. The Receiver Operative Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimum cutoff value of FIB4 to rule out CSLF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>129 (23.4%) of 551 T2D patients in our cohort had CSLF. We found that a FIB-4 of 1.5 rules out CSLF with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Diagnostic Accuracy (DA) of 82.9%, 79.9%, 55.7%, 93.8%, and 80.6%, respectively, compared with a FIB4 of 1.3 which has values of 91.5%, 67.3%, 46.1%, 96.2%, and 72.9%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A FIB-4 cutoff of 1.5 rather than 1.3 is suggested for Indian subjects with T2DM and needs to be validated in further large multicenter prospective studies, preferably with histopathology as the gold standard.</p>","PeriodicalId":13353,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","volume":"29 2","pages":"237-241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijem.ijem_457_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Liver fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is strongly related to hepatic and extrahepatic outcomes. Clinically Significant Liver Fibrosis (CSLF) screening using FIB-4 score is mandated in all T2D patients. The existing FIB-4 cutoff of 1.3 is derived from Western studies and could differ for Indians. Hence, we aimed to determine the FIB-4 cutoff to rule out Transient Elastography (TE) proven CSLF among Indians with T2D.

Methods: 551 individuals with T2D underwent laboratory tests for FIB-4 calculation and transient elastography (TE) to detect CSLF defined as Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) ≥ 8kPa. The Receiver Operative Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimum cutoff value of FIB4 to rule out CSLF.

Results: 129 (23.4%) of 551 T2D patients in our cohort had CSLF. We found that a FIB-4 of 1.5 rules out CSLF with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Diagnostic Accuracy (DA) of 82.9%, 79.9%, 55.7%, 93.8%, and 80.6%, respectively, compared with a FIB4 of 1.3 which has values of 91.5%, 67.3%, 46.1%, 96.2%, and 72.9%, respectively.

Conclusion: A FIB-4 cutoff of 1.5 rather than 1.3 is suggested for Indian subjects with T2DM and needs to be validated in further large multicenter prospective studies, preferably with histopathology as the gold standard.

重新定义印度2型糖尿病患者肝纤维化风险评估:新的FIB-4评分临界值用于优化瞬时弹性成像的序贯评估。
代谢功能障碍相关脂肪变性肝病(MASLD)的肝纤维化与肝脏和肝外预后密切相关。使用FIB-4评分进行临床显著性肝纤维化(CSLF)筛查是所有T2D患者的强制性要求。现有的FIB-4分界点1.3来自西方的研究,对印度人来说可能有所不同。因此,我们的目的是确定FIB-4截止点,以排除印度T2D患者瞬态弹性成像(TE)证实的CSLF。方法:551例T2D患者进行FIB-4计算和瞬态弹性成像(TE)实验室测试,以检测肝刚度测量(LSM)≥8kPa的CSLF。采用受试者工作特征(Receiver Operative Characteristic, ROC)曲线确定FIB4的最佳临界值以排除CSLF。结果:在我们的队列中,551例T2D患者中有129例(23.4%)患有CSLF。我们发现FIB-4为1.5时排除CSLF的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和诊断准确率(DA)分别为82.9%、79.9%、55.7%、93.8%和80.6%,而FIB-4为1.3时排除CSLF的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和诊断准确率(DA)分别为91.5%、67.3%、46.1%、96.2%和72.9%。结论:建议印度T2DM患者的FIB-4临界值为1.5而不是1.3,需要在进一步的大型多中心前瞻性研究中进行验证,最好以组织病理学为金标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism (IJEM) aims to function as the global face of Indian endocrinology research. It aims to act as a bridge between global and national advances in this field. The journal publishes thought-provoking editorials, comprehensive reviews, cutting-edge original research, focused brief communications and insightful letters to editor. The journal encourages authors to submit articles addressing aspects of science related to Endocrinology and Metabolism in particular Diabetology. Articles related to Clinical and Tropical endocrinology are especially encouraged. Sub-topic based Supplements are published regularly. This allows the journal to highlight issues relevant to Endocrine practitioners working in India as well as other countries. IJEM is free access in the true sense of the word, (it charges neither authors nor readers) and this enhances its global appeal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信