Evaluation of the implementation of infection control policies in health facilities in the Popokabaka health district in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

IF 1.7 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3205/dgkh000542
Fraste Kaswij Muswiya, Martin Mutuza Bakuzeza, Dalau Nkamba Mukadi
{"title":"Evaluation of the implementation of infection control policies in health facilities in the Popokabaka health district in the Democratic Republic of Congo.","authors":"Fraste Kaswij Muswiya, Martin Mutuza Bakuzeza, Dalau Nkamba Mukadi","doi":"10.3205/dgkh000542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare quality in health facilities relies on the implementation of and providers' adherence to an effective infection control program. The aim of this study was to assess the implementation level of infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines in healthcare facilities in a low-income country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study conducted in 18 healthcare facilities of the Popokabaka health district in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Data were collected and analyzed following the IPC assessment framework developed by the World Health Organization (WHO). The framework consisted of eight different sections, of which each is scored up to 100. The level of implementation in each facility was assessed based on a scoring system: inadequate (0-200), basic (201-400), intermediate (401-600), and advanced (601-800).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median score of all facilities was 181.3, IQR 145.0-228.1, with a range from inadequate to basic. Ten (55.6%) healthcare facilities had an inadequate IPC implementation level, while eight (44.4%) had a basic level. IPC education and training were the components that were the most poorly implemented in the surveyed facilities. None of these facilities had multimodal strategies to implement IPC interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The level of IPC guideline implementation in healthcare facilities of the Popokabaka health district remains basic as a result of low resource investment in the IPC program. It negatively impacts the quality of care and exposes patients and healthcare providers to healthcare-associated infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":12738,"journal":{"name":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","volume":"20 ","pages":"Doc13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Hygiene and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare quality in health facilities relies on the implementation of and providers' adherence to an effective infection control program. The aim of this study was to assess the implementation level of infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines in healthcare facilities in a low-income country.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in 18 healthcare facilities of the Popokabaka health district in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Data were collected and analyzed following the IPC assessment framework developed by the World Health Organization (WHO). The framework consisted of eight different sections, of which each is scored up to 100. The level of implementation in each facility was assessed based on a scoring system: inadequate (0-200), basic (201-400), intermediate (401-600), and advanced (601-800).

Results: The median score of all facilities was 181.3, IQR 145.0-228.1, with a range from inadequate to basic. Ten (55.6%) healthcare facilities had an inadequate IPC implementation level, while eight (44.4%) had a basic level. IPC education and training were the components that were the most poorly implemented in the surveyed facilities. None of these facilities had multimodal strategies to implement IPC interventions.

Conclusion: The level of IPC guideline implementation in healthcare facilities of the Popokabaka health district remains basic as a result of low resource investment in the IPC program. It negatively impacts the quality of care and exposes patients and healthcare providers to healthcare-associated infections.

评价刚果民主共和国波波卡巴卡卫生区卫生设施感染控制政策的执行情况。
背景:卫生设施的卫生保健质量依赖于有效感染控制规划的实施和提供者的遵守。本研究的目的是评估一个低收入国家卫生保健机构感染预防和控制(IPC)指南的实施水平。方法:这是一项横断面研究,在刚果民主共和国Popokabaka卫生区的18家卫生保健机构进行。根据世界卫生组织(世卫组织)制定的IPC评估框架收集和分析数据。该框架由八个不同的部分组成,每个部分的得分最高为100分。每个设施的实施水平根据评分系统进行评估:不充分(0-200),基本(201-400),中级(401-600)和高级(601-800)。结果:所有设施的中位评分为181.3分,IQR评分为145.0 ~ 228.1分,评分范围从不足到基本。10家(55.6%)卫生保健机构的IPC实施水平不足,8家(44.4%)卫生保健机构的IPC实施水平基本。在接受调查的设施中,IPC教育和培训是执行情况最差的组成部分。这些设施都没有实施IPC干预措施的多模式战略。结论:由于IPC项目的资源投入不足,在Popokabaka卫生区卫生设施中IPC指南的实施水平仍然很基础。它对护理质量产生负面影响,并使患者和医疗保健提供者暴露于与医疗保健相关的感染之中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control
GMS Hygiene and Infection Control PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信