Division and unity: Voter and party perspectives on EU integration under external threat.

IF 2.9 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
European Union Politics Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-03 DOI:10.1177/14651165251318950
Alexandru D Moise, Chendi Wang
{"title":"Division and unity: Voter and party perspectives on EU integration under external threat.","authors":"Alexandru D Moise, Chendi Wang","doi":"10.1177/14651165251318950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Russian invasion of Ukraine has reshaped European politics, prompting the European Union (EU) to take indirect actions such as aiding Ukraine, accepting refugees, and imposing sanctions on Russia. This special section explores the implications of these events on European unity. Will the war highlight divisions among countries and ideological groups, as \"post-functionalists\" would predict? Or will the external threat, in line with the \"bellicist logic,\" and EU solidarity, in line with the \"polity formation\" literature, foster increased EU policy coordination and centralization? The contributions assess the war's impact on the supply (political parties) and demand (public opinion) sides of the politics of European integration. The articles show moderate support for the \"bellicist\" mechanisms of threat and consensus. They also find solidarity and unity for refugee and energy policy, with greater ideological and country divisions over economic policy, defence policy, and appeasement strategies toward Russia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12077,"journal":{"name":"European Union Politics","volume":"26 2","pages":"296-309"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12097700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Union Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165251318950","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has reshaped European politics, prompting the European Union (EU) to take indirect actions such as aiding Ukraine, accepting refugees, and imposing sanctions on Russia. This special section explores the implications of these events on European unity. Will the war highlight divisions among countries and ideological groups, as "post-functionalists" would predict? Or will the external threat, in line with the "bellicist logic," and EU solidarity, in line with the "polity formation" literature, foster increased EU policy coordination and centralization? The contributions assess the war's impact on the supply (political parties) and demand (public opinion) sides of the politics of European integration. The articles show moderate support for the "bellicist" mechanisms of threat and consensus. They also find solidarity and unity for refugee and energy policy, with greater ideological and country divisions over economic policy, defence policy, and appeasement strategies toward Russia.

分裂与团结:外部威胁下欧盟一体化的选民与政党视角。
俄罗斯对乌克兰的入侵重塑了欧洲政治,促使欧盟(EU)采取了援助乌克兰、接收难民、对俄罗斯实施制裁等间接行动。本专题探讨了这些事件对欧洲统一的影响。这场战争会像“后功能主义者”所预测的那样,突显国家和意识形态之间的分歧吗?或者,符合“好战逻辑”的外部威胁,以及符合“政体形成”文献的欧盟团结,会促进欧盟政策协调和中央集权吗?这些贡献评估了战争对欧洲一体化政治的供给(政党)和需求(公众舆论)方面的影响。文章显示出对威胁和共识的“好战”机制的适度支持。他们还发现在难民和能源政策上团结一致,在经济政策、国防政策和对俄罗斯的绥靖战略上存在更大的意识形态和国家分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Union Politics
European Union Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
21.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: European Union Politics is an international academic journal for advanced peer-reviewed research and scholarship on all aspects of the process of government, politics and policy in the European Union. It aims to stimulate debate and provide a forum to bridge the theoretical and empirical analysis on the political unification of Europe. It represents no particular school or approach, nor is it wedded to any particular methodology. In particular it welcomes articles that offer a new theoretical argument, analyze original data in a novel fashion or present an innovative methodological approach. The Editors invite submissions from all sub-fields of contemporary political science, including international relations, comparative politics, public administration, public policy and political theory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信