{"title":"Patient Values Influence Clinician Judgment of Medical Decision-Making Capacity.","authors":"Emilee M Ertle, Darby M Simon, Benjamin T Mast","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2025.2505581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medical decision-making capacity assessments commonly focus on patient communication, understanding, appreciation, and reasoning, with less emphasis on patient values or preferences that could influence their medical decision. The current study investigates the role of patient values in capacity assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and ten clinicians with experience conducting medical decision-making capacity assessments completed an online survey. Participants read two vignettes about a patient with questionable capacity and were asked to determine whether the patient had capacity. For the second vignette, participants were randomly assigned to read a vignette which contained information about the patient's longstanding values or a vignette without this information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When information about the patient's values and preferences was included in the vignette, participants were significantly more likely to determine the patient had capacity to make a medical decision. Other significant contributors to a clinician's judgment included experience conducting medical decision-making capacity assessments in a VA hospital and whether the clinician prioritized the patient's autonomy or their health and safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A patient's values and preferences provide important context which significantly influences clinician judgment of capacity.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Clinicians should regularly assess a patient's values and preferences when conducting capacity assessments, as this may promote patient autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2025.2505581","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Medical decision-making capacity assessments commonly focus on patient communication, understanding, appreciation, and reasoning, with less emphasis on patient values or preferences that could influence their medical decision. The current study investigates the role of patient values in capacity assessments.
Methods: One hundred and ten clinicians with experience conducting medical decision-making capacity assessments completed an online survey. Participants read two vignettes about a patient with questionable capacity and were asked to determine whether the patient had capacity. For the second vignette, participants were randomly assigned to read a vignette which contained information about the patient's longstanding values or a vignette without this information.
Results: When information about the patient's values and preferences was included in the vignette, participants were significantly more likely to determine the patient had capacity to make a medical decision. Other significant contributors to a clinician's judgment included experience conducting medical decision-making capacity assessments in a VA hospital and whether the clinician prioritized the patient's autonomy or their health and safety.
Conclusions: A patient's values and preferences provide important context which significantly influences clinician judgment of capacity.
Clinical implications: Clinicians should regularly assess a patient's values and preferences when conducting capacity assessments, as this may promote patient autonomy.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including:
-adjustments to changing roles-
issues related to diversity and aging-
family caregiving-
spirituality-
cognitive and psychosocial assessment-
depression, anxiety, and PTSD-
Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders-
long term care-
behavioral medicine in aging-
rehabilitation and education for older adults.
Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.