How Can We Decrease Early Dialysis Initiation? An Interactive Quality Improvement Teaching Case for Health Care Providers and Narrative Review of Quality Improvement Methodology.

IF 1.5 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease Pub Date : 2025-05-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20543581251323947
Khaled Lotfy, Epsita Shome-Vasanthan, Samuel A Silver, Tamara Glavinovic
{"title":"How Can We Decrease Early Dialysis Initiation? An Interactive Quality Improvement Teaching Case for Health Care Providers and Narrative Review of Quality Improvement Methodology.","authors":"Khaled Lotfy, Epsita Shome-Vasanthan, Samuel A Silver, Tamara Glavinovic","doi":"10.1177/20543581251323947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Quality improvement (QI) initiatives use a team-based approach to problem-solving clinical and health system issues. All QI initiatives require the coordinated efforts of health care professionals and other stakeholders to encourage the provision of evidence-based clinical care. Most clinicians understand the principles of QI but may lack the training necessary to undertake individual projects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An educational, nephrology-oriented clinical case was created based on the IDEAL study on timing of dialysis initiation, a prioritized quality indicator in several provinces. The case illustrates how to utilize commonly employed QI methodology and to provide a pragmatic framework for both developing and running a QI project. Core concepts addressed in this review include how to perform a QI chart audit, identification of a quality-of-care problem, engaging stakeholders, and how to conduct a root cause analysis that leads to selection of QI measures and change solutions. Last, plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles and interpretation of data using run charts are highlighted.</p><p><strong>Sources of information: </strong>PubMed and Google scholar were used as sources of published QI methodology.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>This nephrology-oriented QI case highlights how a core set of QI principles and tools can be used to improve clinical care. This review demonstrates that determining clear goals, utilizing evidence-based guidance to improve timing of dialysis initiation, engaging the appropriate stakeholders, identifying a feasible and measurable change, and tracking if that change leads to improvement are essential components of all QI initiatives. The above framework can be utilized in a variety of clinical areas both within and beyond nephrology-specific care.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Considerations regarding QI-specific data analysis were not addressed as they were beyond the scope of this review.</p>","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20543581251323947"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581251323947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Quality improvement (QI) initiatives use a team-based approach to problem-solving clinical and health system issues. All QI initiatives require the coordinated efforts of health care professionals and other stakeholders to encourage the provision of evidence-based clinical care. Most clinicians understand the principles of QI but may lack the training necessary to undertake individual projects.

Methods: An educational, nephrology-oriented clinical case was created based on the IDEAL study on timing of dialysis initiation, a prioritized quality indicator in several provinces. The case illustrates how to utilize commonly employed QI methodology and to provide a pragmatic framework for both developing and running a QI project. Core concepts addressed in this review include how to perform a QI chart audit, identification of a quality-of-care problem, engaging stakeholders, and how to conduct a root cause analysis that leads to selection of QI measures and change solutions. Last, plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles and interpretation of data using run charts are highlighted.

Sources of information: PubMed and Google scholar were used as sources of published QI methodology.

Key findings: This nephrology-oriented QI case highlights how a core set of QI principles and tools can be used to improve clinical care. This review demonstrates that determining clear goals, utilizing evidence-based guidance to improve timing of dialysis initiation, engaging the appropriate stakeholders, identifying a feasible and measurable change, and tracking if that change leads to improvement are essential components of all QI initiatives. The above framework can be utilized in a variety of clinical areas both within and beyond nephrology-specific care.

Limitations: Considerations regarding QI-specific data analysis were not addressed as they were beyond the scope of this review.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

如何减少早期透析启动?医疗服务提供者互动品质改善教学案例及品质改善方法的叙述回顾。
回顾目的:质量改进(QI)计划使用基于团队的方法来解决临床和卫生系统问题。所有的卫生保健质量倡议都需要卫生保健专业人员和其他利益相关者的协调努力,以鼓励提供循证临床护理。大多数临床医生了解QI的原则,但可能缺乏进行个别项目所需的培训。方法:根据IDEAL对透析起始时间的研究,创建一个具有教育意义的肾脏学临床病例,这是几个省份的优先质量指标。该案例说明了如何利用常用的QI方法,并为开发和运行QI项目提供实用的框架。本综述中涉及的核心概念包括如何执行QI图表审核、识别护理质量问题、吸引利益相关者以及如何进行根本原因分析,从而选择QI措施和更改解决方案。最后,重点介绍了计划-执行-研究-行动(PDSA)循环和使用运行图对数据的解释。信息来源:PubMed和谷歌学者被用作已发表的QI方法的来源。主要发现:这个以肾脏病学为导向的QI病例强调了如何使用一套核心QI原则和工具来改善临床护理。本综述表明,确定明确的目标,利用循证指导来改善透析启动时间,吸引适当的利益相关者,确定可行和可衡量的变化,并跟踪该变化是否导致改善是所有QI倡议的重要组成部分。上述框架可用于各种临床领域内和超出肾脏学特定护理。局限性:由于超出了本综述的范围,因此未涉及有关qi特定数据分析的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, the official journal of the Canadian Society of Nephrology, is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encourages high quality submissions focused on clinical, translational and health services delivery research in the field of chronic kidney disease, dialysis, kidney transplantation and organ donation. Our mandate is to promote and advocate for kidney health as it impacts national and international communities. Basic science, translational studies and clinical studies will be peer reviewed and processed by an Editorial Board comprised of geographically diverse Canadian and international nephrologists, internists and allied health professionals; this Editorial Board is mandated to ensure highest quality publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信