Zonghui Feng, Yan Chen, Fengmei Yi, Min Li, Shumin Jiang, Chunyue He, Yangli Chen, Maosheng Chen, Wencheng Li
{"title":"Importance of single nucleotide polymorphism microarray in prenatal diagnosis.","authors":"Zonghui Feng, Yan Chen, Fengmei Yi, Min Li, Shumin Jiang, Chunyue He, Yangli Chen, Maosheng Chen, Wencheng Li","doi":"10.17219/acem/202728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the increasing number of older pregnant women and environmental pollution, the incidence of congenital malformations increases every year. Prenatal diagnosis is an effective means of identifying congenital malformations.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the clinical utility of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray analysis during prenatal evaluations.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>To assess the similarities and differences between the 2 approaches, 425 pregnant women were selected to undergo prenatal gene SNP microarray analysis and karyotype analysis during prenatal evaluation between January 2020 and August 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate of SNP microarray analysis was 100%, which was statistically different from that of karyotype analysis (92%, Fisher's exact test, p < 0.001). The positive rate of SNP detection was 10.4% higher than karyotype analysis, which was 6.6% (Pearson's χ2 test, χ2 = 3.89, degrees of freedom (df) = 1, p = 0.049). Karyotype analysis detected 28 cases of aneuploidy; SNPs could not only detect these results of karyotype analysis, but 16 cases of copy number variations (CNV) with obvious pathogenicity, including duplications/deletions, chimerism and loss of heterozygosity (LOH).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray analysis technology is an important method used in prenatal genetic evaluations, which can find fetal genetic etiologies, correctly evaluate the fetal prognosis during prenatal clinical examination, and provide a more objective basis for whether to continue the pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/202728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: With the increasing number of older pregnant women and environmental pollution, the incidence of congenital malformations increases every year. Prenatal diagnosis is an effective means of identifying congenital malformations.
Objectives: To evaluate the clinical utility of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray analysis during prenatal evaluations.
Material and methods: To assess the similarities and differences between the 2 approaches, 425 pregnant women were selected to undergo prenatal gene SNP microarray analysis and karyotype analysis during prenatal evaluation between January 2020 and August 2021.
Results: The success rate of SNP microarray analysis was 100%, which was statistically different from that of karyotype analysis (92%, Fisher's exact test, p < 0.001). The positive rate of SNP detection was 10.4% higher than karyotype analysis, which was 6.6% (Pearson's χ2 test, χ2 = 3.89, degrees of freedom (df) = 1, p = 0.049). Karyotype analysis detected 28 cases of aneuploidy; SNPs could not only detect these results of karyotype analysis, but 16 cases of copy number variations (CNV) with obvious pathogenicity, including duplications/deletions, chimerism and loss of heterozygosity (LOH).
Conclusions: Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray analysis technology is an important method used in prenatal genetic evaluations, which can find fetal genetic etiologies, correctly evaluate the fetal prognosis during prenatal clinical examination, and provide a more objective basis for whether to continue the pregnancy.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly.
Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff.
Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj.
Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker.
The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition.
In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus.
Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.