Importance of single nucleotide polymorphism microarray in prenatal diagnosis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Zonghui Feng, Yan Chen, Fengmei Yi, Min Li, Shumin Jiang, Chunyue He, Yangli Chen, Maosheng Chen, Wencheng Li
{"title":"Importance of single nucleotide polymorphism microarray in prenatal diagnosis.","authors":"Zonghui Feng, Yan Chen, Fengmei Yi, Min Li, Shumin Jiang, Chunyue He, Yangli Chen, Maosheng Chen, Wencheng Li","doi":"10.17219/acem/202728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the increasing number of older pregnant women and environmental pollution, the incidence of congenital malformations increases every year. Prenatal diagnosis is an effective means of identifying congenital malformations.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the clinical utility of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray analysis during prenatal evaluations.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>To assess the similarities and differences between the 2 approaches, 425 pregnant women were selected to undergo prenatal gene SNP microarray analysis and karyotype analysis during prenatal evaluation between January 2020 and August 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate of SNP microarray analysis was 100%, which was statistically different from that of karyotype analysis (92%, Fisher's exact test, p < 0.001). The positive rate of SNP detection was 10.4% higher than karyotype analysis, which was 6.6% (Pearson's χ2 test, χ2 = 3.89, degrees of freedom (df) = 1, p = 0.049). Karyotype analysis detected 28 cases of aneuploidy; SNPs could not only detect these results of karyotype analysis, but 16 cases of copy number variations (CNV) with obvious pathogenicity, including duplications/deletions, chimerism and loss of heterozygosity (LOH).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray analysis technology is an important method used in prenatal genetic evaluations, which can find fetal genetic etiologies, correctly evaluate the fetal prognosis during prenatal clinical examination, and provide a more objective basis for whether to continue the pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/202728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the increasing number of older pregnant women and environmental pollution, the incidence of congenital malformations increases every year. Prenatal diagnosis is an effective means of identifying congenital malformations.

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical utility of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray analysis during prenatal evaluations.

Material and methods: To assess the similarities and differences between the 2 approaches, 425 pregnant women were selected to undergo prenatal gene SNP microarray analysis and karyotype analysis during prenatal evaluation between January 2020 and August 2021.

Results: The success rate of SNP microarray analysis was 100%, which was statistically different from that of karyotype analysis (92%, Fisher's exact test, p < 0.001). The positive rate of SNP detection was 10.4% higher than karyotype analysis, which was 6.6% (Pearson's χ2 test, χ2 = 3.89, degrees of freedom (df) = 1, p = 0.049). Karyotype analysis detected 28 cases of aneuploidy; SNPs could not only detect these results of karyotype analysis, but 16 cases of copy number variations (CNV) with obvious pathogenicity, including duplications/deletions, chimerism and loss of heterozygosity (LOH).

Conclusions: Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray analysis technology is an important method used in prenatal genetic evaluations, which can find fetal genetic etiologies, correctly evaluate the fetal prognosis during prenatal clinical examination, and provide a more objective basis for whether to continue the pregnancy.

单核苷酸多态性芯片在产前诊断中的重要性。
背景:随着高龄孕妇数量的增加和环境污染的加剧,先天性畸形的发病率逐年上升。产前诊断是识别先天畸形的有效手段。目的:评价单核苷酸多态性(SNP)微阵列分析在产前评估中的临床应用。材料与方法:为评估两种方法的异同,选取2020年1月至2021年8月期间进行产前评估的425名孕妇进行产前基因SNP微阵列分析和核型分析。结果:SNP微阵列分析的成功率为100%,与核型分析的成功率(92%,Fisher精确检验,p < 0.001)有统计学差异。SNP检测阳性率比核型分析高10.4%,阳性率为6.6% (Pearson χ2检验,χ2 = 3.89,自由度(df) = 1, p = 0.049)。核型分析发现非整倍体28例;snp不仅可以检测这些核型分析结果,而且16例拷贝数变异(CNV)具有明显的致病性,包括重复/缺失、嵌合和杂合性缺失(LOH)。结论:单核苷酸多态性微阵列分析技术是产前遗传评价的重要方法,可以发现胎儿遗传病因,在产前临床检查中正确评价胎儿预后,为是否继续妊娠提供更客观的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly. Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff. Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj. Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker. The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus. Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信