Erbium:Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser Therapy Versus Sharp Debridement in the Management of Chronic Ulcers of the Lower Extremity: A Randomised Control Trial

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Alexander Evgenievich Zaitsev, Oleg Nikolaevich Asanov
{"title":"Erbium:Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser Therapy Versus Sharp Debridement in the Management of Chronic Ulcers of the Lower Extremity: A Randomised Control Trial","authors":"Alexander Evgenievich Zaitsev,&nbsp;Oleg Nikolaevich Asanov","doi":"10.1111/iwj.70688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chronic wounds pose significant challenges to patients and potentially reduce patients' quality of life. A prospective randomised control trial (RCT) was conducted in Russia between 2018 and 2021 to assess the effectiveness of treating chronic wounds with a high-intensity Erbium: Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Er:YAG with RecoSMA (Reconstructive Spatially Modulated Ablation module for distributing laser radiation into microbeams) laser technology versus sharp debridement in 144 patients (treatment group <i>N</i> = 71; control <i>N</i> = 73) with diabetic foot, venous and arterial leg ulcers. The median ulcer size at baseline in the treatment and control group was 11 cm<sup>2</sup> and 10 cm<sup>2</sup> with median ulcer duration of 16 months and 15 months, respectively. The endpoints were the time to achieve a clean wound bed, time to granulation, extent of complete and marginal epithelialisation, change in wound area, presence of bacteria, levels of topical wound pain, and the patients' tolerance of debridement. A difference at <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. After a 30-day observation period, complete epithelialisation occurred in more than twice as many wounds in the treatment group (56.3%) compared to the control group (26%). The Er:YAG laser was more effective than sharp debridement in clearing wounds of microbial flora, stimulating tissue regeneration, promoting early granulation, marginal epithelialisation and wound healing, suggesting that Er:YAG laser therapy may offer greater benefits than conventional methods of sharp debridement of slow healing wounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":"22 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iwj.70688","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70688","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic wounds pose significant challenges to patients and potentially reduce patients' quality of life. A prospective randomised control trial (RCT) was conducted in Russia between 2018 and 2021 to assess the effectiveness of treating chronic wounds with a high-intensity Erbium: Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Er:YAG with RecoSMA (Reconstructive Spatially Modulated Ablation module for distributing laser radiation into microbeams) laser technology versus sharp debridement in 144 patients (treatment group N = 71; control N = 73) with diabetic foot, venous and arterial leg ulcers. The median ulcer size at baseline in the treatment and control group was 11 cm2 and 10 cm2 with median ulcer duration of 16 months and 15 months, respectively. The endpoints were the time to achieve a clean wound bed, time to granulation, extent of complete and marginal epithelialisation, change in wound area, presence of bacteria, levels of topical wound pain, and the patients' tolerance of debridement. A difference at p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. After a 30-day observation period, complete epithelialisation occurred in more than twice as many wounds in the treatment group (56.3%) compared to the control group (26%). The Er:YAG laser was more effective than sharp debridement in clearing wounds of microbial flora, stimulating tissue regeneration, promoting early granulation, marginal epithelialisation and wound healing, suggesting that Er:YAG laser therapy may offer greater benefits than conventional methods of sharp debridement of slow healing wounds.

铒:钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光治疗与尖锐清创治疗下肢慢性溃疡的对照试验
慢性伤口给患者带来了巨大的挑战,并可能降低患者的生活质量。2018年至2021年在俄罗斯进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验(RCT),以评估144例患者(治疗组N = 71;对照组73例,伴有糖尿病足、静脉和动脉溃疡。治疗组和对照组基线时的中位溃疡面积分别为11 cm2和10 cm2,中位溃疡持续时间分别为16个月和15个月。终点是达到清洁伤口床的时间,肉芽化的时间,完全上皮化和边缘上皮化的程度,伤口面积的变化,细菌的存在,局部伤口疼痛的程度,以及患者对清创的耐受性。p <; 0.05的差异被认为具有统计学意义。经过30天的观察期,治疗组创面完全上皮化的发生率(56.3%)是对照组创面完全上皮化发生率(26%)的两倍多。Er:YAG激光在清除伤口微生物菌群、刺激组织再生、促进早期肉芽、边缘上皮化和伤口愈合方面比尖锐清创更有效,这表明Er:YAG激光治疗可能比传统的缓慢愈合伤口的尖锐清创方法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Wound Journal
International Wound Journal DERMATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
266
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories: - Research papers - Review articles - Clinical studies - Letters - News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies. Calendar of events The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信