{"title":"Current Status of Gastric Cancer Screening and Future Perspectives","authors":"Chika Kusano, Fumiaki Ishibashi, Chikamasa Ichita, Takuji Gotoda","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gastric cancer (GC) remains a major global health concern, particularly in East Asia, Central Asia, and Eastern Europe, where its incidence and mortality rates are high. <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection is the primary cause of GC and leads to carcinogenic progression from nonatrophic gastritis to cancer. Although screening programs have been implemented in high-risk countries, such as Japan and South Korea, comprehensive strategies remain limited globally. This study reviewed the status of GC screening worldwide and prevention strategies in regions with different risks. Various GC screening methods have been developed, including <i>H. pylori</i> serology, serum pepsinogen testing, upper gastrointestinal contrast radiography, and endoscopy. Endoscopic screening has shown superior sensitivity and specificity, reducing GC mortality by up to 47% in South Korea and demonstrating higher detection rates than upper gastrointestinal contrast radiography and pepsinogen testing. However, cost-effectiveness remains a challenge, particularly in Western countries where the overall GC prevalence is lower. Risk stratification using a combination of <i>H. pylori</i> serology and pepsinogen testing has been adopted in Japan to optimize screening efficiency. Additionally, <i>H. pylori</i> eradication has been recognized as a cost-effective strategy to reduce the incidence of GC with economic benefits demonstrated in Japan and other high-risk regions. In the United States, targeted screening of high-risk immigrant populations has been suggested to enhance cost-effectiveness. GC screening strategies should consider developing epidemiological trends, cost-effectiveness, and risk-based approaches. Future efforts should focus on expanding targeted screening initiatives to high-risk groups to improve early detection and survival rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70148","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) remains a major global health concern, particularly in East Asia, Central Asia, and Eastern Europe, where its incidence and mortality rates are high. Helicobacter pylori infection is the primary cause of GC and leads to carcinogenic progression from nonatrophic gastritis to cancer. Although screening programs have been implemented in high-risk countries, such as Japan and South Korea, comprehensive strategies remain limited globally. This study reviewed the status of GC screening worldwide and prevention strategies in regions with different risks. Various GC screening methods have been developed, including H. pylori serology, serum pepsinogen testing, upper gastrointestinal contrast radiography, and endoscopy. Endoscopic screening has shown superior sensitivity and specificity, reducing GC mortality by up to 47% in South Korea and demonstrating higher detection rates than upper gastrointestinal contrast radiography and pepsinogen testing. However, cost-effectiveness remains a challenge, particularly in Western countries where the overall GC prevalence is lower. Risk stratification using a combination of H. pylori serology and pepsinogen testing has been adopted in Japan to optimize screening efficiency. Additionally, H. pylori eradication has been recognized as a cost-effective strategy to reduce the incidence of GC with economic benefits demonstrated in Japan and other high-risk regions. In the United States, targeted screening of high-risk immigrant populations has been suggested to enhance cost-effectiveness. GC screening strategies should consider developing epidemiological trends, cost-effectiveness, and risk-based approaches. Future efforts should focus on expanding targeted screening initiatives to high-risk groups to improve early detection and survival rates.