Chemical Characterisation and Biorefinery Efficiency of Timothy Grass and Pulp Silages

IF 2.9 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
N. Ayanfe, M. Franco, T. Jalava, T. Stefański, M. Rinne
{"title":"Chemical Characterisation and Biorefinery Efficiency of Timothy Grass and Pulp Silages","authors":"N. Ayanfe,&nbsp;M. Franco,&nbsp;T. Jalava,&nbsp;T. Stefański,&nbsp;M. Rinne","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigated the effects of increased dry matter concentration by screw-pressing or wilting and additive application on fermentation quality of primary growth (PG) and first regrowth (ReG) timothy grass. Additionally, the nutritional quality of the liquid produced during the screw-pressing of pre-ensiled and ensiled biomasses was assessed. Two experiments were conducted: PG grass (Experiment 1) was ensiled fresh (Intact) and following liquid extraction via screw-pressing of fresh biomass (Pulp), whilst ReG included wilted biomass in addition to Intact and Pulp (Experiment 2). Biomasses were ensiled without any additives (Control), with lactic acid bacteria inoculant (LAB), or with a formic acid-based additive (FA). The PG biomasses were ensiled in vacuum bags and ReG in laboratory-scale cylindrical silos for 3 months. The silages were subjected to screw-pressing, and the chemical composition of the liquid was analysed. In both experiments, the Pulp had reduced water-soluble carbohydrates and ash compared to the Intact biomass, but crude protein concentration was not affected. In Experiment 2, pulping and wilting improved ensilability. Silages in both experiments exhibited good fermentation quality, with low pH and ammonia nitrogen concentration. Additionally, FA further reduced protein degradation. Wilting restricted silage fermentation, resulting in slightly elevated pH and reduced lactic acid production, alongside decreased ethanol production. Additives improved fermentation quality in different ways; LAB decreased the pH in wilted silages, and FA initiated fibre hydrolysis, leading to an increase in water-soluble carbohydrate concentration, which surpassed levels present in the raw material. In Experiment 2, ensiling increased liquid yield and protein capture into the liquid fraction compared to fresh biomass. Screw-pressing silage treated with LAB increased crude protein concentration in the liquid whilst FA reduced it. Different processing methods demonstrated possibilities to vary feedstock composition for biorefineries, which can be optimised based on the target end products.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.12722","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12722","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of increased dry matter concentration by screw-pressing or wilting and additive application on fermentation quality of primary growth (PG) and first regrowth (ReG) timothy grass. Additionally, the nutritional quality of the liquid produced during the screw-pressing of pre-ensiled and ensiled biomasses was assessed. Two experiments were conducted: PG grass (Experiment 1) was ensiled fresh (Intact) and following liquid extraction via screw-pressing of fresh biomass (Pulp), whilst ReG included wilted biomass in addition to Intact and Pulp (Experiment 2). Biomasses were ensiled without any additives (Control), with lactic acid bacteria inoculant (LAB), or with a formic acid-based additive (FA). The PG biomasses were ensiled in vacuum bags and ReG in laboratory-scale cylindrical silos for 3 months. The silages were subjected to screw-pressing, and the chemical composition of the liquid was analysed. In both experiments, the Pulp had reduced water-soluble carbohydrates and ash compared to the Intact biomass, but crude protein concentration was not affected. In Experiment 2, pulping and wilting improved ensilability. Silages in both experiments exhibited good fermentation quality, with low pH and ammonia nitrogen concentration. Additionally, FA further reduced protein degradation. Wilting restricted silage fermentation, resulting in slightly elevated pH and reduced lactic acid production, alongside decreased ethanol production. Additives improved fermentation quality in different ways; LAB decreased the pH in wilted silages, and FA initiated fibre hydrolysis, leading to an increase in water-soluble carbohydrate concentration, which surpassed levels present in the raw material. In Experiment 2, ensiling increased liquid yield and protein capture into the liquid fraction compared to fresh biomass. Screw-pressing silage treated with LAB increased crude protein concentration in the liquid whilst FA reduced it. Different processing methods demonstrated possibilities to vary feedstock composition for biorefineries, which can be optimised based on the target end products.

Abstract Image

提摩西草和纸浆青贮的化学特性及生物精炼效率
本试验研究了螺旋压榨、萎蔫处理下干物质浓度的增加和添加剂的施用对初生草和初再生草发酵品质的影响。此外,还评估了预青贮和青贮生物质螺旋压榨过程中产生的液体的营养品质。进行了两个实验:PG草(实验1)青贮新鲜(完整),然后通过螺旋压榨新鲜生物质(纸浆)进行液体提取,而ReG除完整和纸浆(实验2)外还包括枯萎的生物质。在不添加任何添加剂(Control)、乳酸菌接种剂(LAB)或甲酸基添加剂(FA)的情况下对生物质进行青贮。PG生物质分别在真空袋和实验室规模的圆柱形筒仓中青贮3个月。对青贮料进行螺旋压榨,并对压榨液进行化学成分分析。在两个实验中,与完整生物量相比,纸浆的水溶性碳水化合物和灰分都减少了,但粗蛋白质浓度没有受到影响。在实验2中,制浆和萎蔫均能提高柔韧度。两个试验青贮的发酵品质均较好,pH值和氨氮浓度均较低。此外,FA进一步降低了蛋白质降解。萎蔫限制了青贮发酵,导致pH值略微升高,乳酸产量减少,乙醇产量下降。添加剂对发酵品质有不同的改善作用;LAB降低了枯萎青贮的pH值,FA启动了纤维水解,导致水溶性碳水化合物浓度增加,超过了原料中的水平。在实验2中,与新鲜生物量相比,青贮提高了液体产量和蛋白质捕获到液体部分。乳酸菌处理的螺旋压青贮液中粗蛋白质含量升高,FA降低。不同的加工方法证明了改变生物精炼厂原料组成的可能性,这可以根据目标最终产品进行优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信