Induced resistance and nutrient deterrence reduce aphid reproduction and improve crop yield, phenolic defense, and economic benefits of canola (Brassica napus L.) in the field

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Muhammad Wajid Javed,  Mansoor-Ul-Hasan, Muhammad Sagheer, Shahbaz Talib Sahi
{"title":"Induced resistance and nutrient deterrence reduce aphid reproduction and improve crop yield, phenolic defense, and economic benefits of canola (Brassica napus L.) in the field","authors":"Muhammad Wajid Javed,&nbsp; Mansoor-Ul-Hasan,&nbsp;Muhammad Sagheer,&nbsp;Shahbaz Talib Sahi","doi":"10.1007/s11829-025-10154-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cabbage aphid, <i>Brevicoryne brassicae</i> L., is a key pest of canola (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.), all over the world. A few studies have focused on its field management using inducers or nutrients; however, none of them focused on aphid reproduction indices, phenolic defense, and economic returns. Induced resistance treatments were comprised of 0, 0.5, and 1 mM concentrations of SA—Salicylic Acid and CA—Citric Acid, while nutrient deterrence had 25 and 50 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> doses of Si—Silicon and AS—Ammonium Sulfate. Both approaches were compared to an insecticide (Carbosulfan 20 EC) and untreated control for two years in a field experiment. Although insecticide was an effective treatment, its impacts were not long-lived. The 1 mM SA reduced aphid reproduction the most, followed by 0.5 mM SA, 1 mM CA, and 0.5 mM CA. Similarly, in nutrient deterrence, Si 50 kg reduced the aphid reproduction indices followed by Si 25 kg and AS 25 kg. Seed yield was improved by 37.8% in AS 50 kg, followed by Si 50 kg (29.8%), and 1 mM SA (25.4%), over the insecticide. Other treatments were not performing well. Phenolic defense chemicals were highest in Si 50 kg, followed by Si 25, AS 25 kg, and 1 mM SA. Marginal analysis followed by residual analysis revealed AS 25 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> to be the most economical treatment followed by 0.5 mM SA for recommending to the farming community. Conclusively, both approaches showed the potential to manage cabbage aphids on canola and improved crop yield and phenolic defense; however, additional research is desired to explore their possible mechanism of resistance in plants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8409,"journal":{"name":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthropod-Plant Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11829-025-10154-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cabbage aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae L., is a key pest of canola (Brassica napus L.), all over the world. A few studies have focused on its field management using inducers or nutrients; however, none of them focused on aphid reproduction indices, phenolic defense, and economic returns. Induced resistance treatments were comprised of 0, 0.5, and 1 mM concentrations of SA—Salicylic Acid and CA—Citric Acid, while nutrient deterrence had 25 and 50 kg ha−1 doses of Si—Silicon and AS—Ammonium Sulfate. Both approaches were compared to an insecticide (Carbosulfan 20 EC) and untreated control for two years in a field experiment. Although insecticide was an effective treatment, its impacts were not long-lived. The 1 mM SA reduced aphid reproduction the most, followed by 0.5 mM SA, 1 mM CA, and 0.5 mM CA. Similarly, in nutrient deterrence, Si 50 kg reduced the aphid reproduction indices followed by Si 25 kg and AS 25 kg. Seed yield was improved by 37.8% in AS 50 kg, followed by Si 50 kg (29.8%), and 1 mM SA (25.4%), over the insecticide. Other treatments were not performing well. Phenolic defense chemicals were highest in Si 50 kg, followed by Si 25, AS 25 kg, and 1 mM SA. Marginal analysis followed by residual analysis revealed AS 25 kg ha−1 to be the most economical treatment followed by 0.5 mM SA for recommending to the farming community. Conclusively, both approaches showed the potential to manage cabbage aphids on canola and improved crop yield and phenolic defense; however, additional research is desired to explore their possible mechanism of resistance in plants.

诱导抗性和养分威慑可以减少蚜虫繁殖,提高油菜田间产量、酚类防御能力和经济效益
甘蓝蚜(Brevicoryne brassicae L.)是油菜(Brassica napus L.)的主要害虫。一些研究侧重于利用诱导剂或营养剂进行田间管理;但均未对蚜虫繁殖指数、酚类防御和经济效益进行研究。诱导抗性处理分别为0、0.5和1 mM浓度的sa -水杨酸和ca -柠檬酸,而营养威慑处理分别为25和50 kg ha - 1剂量的si -硅和as -硫酸铵。在两年的田间试验中,将这两种方法与一种杀虫剂(Carbosulfan 20ec)和未经处理的对照进行了比较。虽然杀虫剂是一种有效的治疗方法,但其影响并不持久。1 mM SA对蚜虫繁殖的抑制作用最大,其次是0.5 mM SA、1 mM CA和0.5 mM CA。同样,在营养抑制方面,Si 50 kg对蚜虫繁殖指数的抑制作用最大,其次是Si 25 kg和AS 25 kg。用量为50 kg时种子产量提高37.8%,用量为50 kg时增产29.8%,用量为1 mM时增产25.4%。其他治疗效果不佳。酚类防御化学物质在Si 50 kg时含量最高,其次是Si 25、AS 25 kg和1 mM SA。边际分析和残差分析表明,25 kg ha - 1的AS处理是最经济的处理,其次是0.5 mM SA,可推荐给农业社区。综上所述,这两种方法都显示出控制油菜蚜虫、提高作物产量和酚类防御的潜力;然而,需要进一步的研究来探索它们在植物中可能的抗性机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthropod-Plant Interactions
Arthropod-Plant Interactions 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Arthropod-Plant Interactions is dedicated to publishing high quality original papers and reviews with a broad fundamental or applied focus on ecological, biological, and evolutionary aspects of the interactions between insects and other arthropods with plants. Coverage extends to all aspects of such interactions including chemical, biochemical, genetic, and molecular analysis, as well reporting on multitrophic studies, ecophysiology, and mutualism. Arthropod-Plant Interactions encourages the submission of forum papers that challenge prevailing hypotheses. The journal encourages a diversity of opinion by presenting both invited and unsolicited review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信