Damage zone analysis and its effect on the elastic constants of beech blocks with different grain orientations under compression

IF 3 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Wengang Hu, Peng Yang, Yan Wang, Jilei Zhang
{"title":"Damage zone analysis and its effect on the elastic constants of beech blocks with different grain orientations under compression","authors":"Wengang Hu,&nbsp;Peng Yang,&nbsp;Yan Wang,&nbsp;Jilei Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00226-025-01664-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The damage zone and its effects on orthotropic deformations and elastic constants of beech blocks when subjected to compressive loading were investigated. The impact of surface treatment (sanded and speckled) on strain contours was examined first, followed by evaluating the effects of grain orientation, damage zone location, and load level on the length of damage zone. Subsequently, the effects of damage zone location on measured elastic moduli of beech blocks in various directions were evaluated. Finally, the factors on the elastic constants of beech blocks were investigated by considering six different strain-measuring methods. Experimental analyses found that sanded and speckled blocks had nearly identical strain contours when subjected to compressive loading in radial (R), tangential (T), and RT45° grain orientations, respectively. The length of the damage zone was significantly affected by grain orientation, load level, and damage zone location. The ratios of the length of the damage zone to the length of the tested block in different grain orientations ranged from 0.041 to 0.074 at proportional limit load and 0.045–0.078 at yield load. The mean ratio of each of the three elastic moduli measured in two ends of a tested beech block to one measured in its middle section ranged from 0.41 to 0.58. The length of the damage zone measured in tested beech blocks tended to show a negative correlation to its measured elastic moduli. These findings could provide a basic understanding of damage zones to analytical and numerical modeling of orthotropic deformations of beech wood.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":810,"journal":{"name":"Wood Science and Technology","volume":"59 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wood Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00226-025-01664-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The damage zone and its effects on orthotropic deformations and elastic constants of beech blocks when subjected to compressive loading were investigated. The impact of surface treatment (sanded and speckled) on strain contours was examined first, followed by evaluating the effects of grain orientation, damage zone location, and load level on the length of damage zone. Subsequently, the effects of damage zone location on measured elastic moduli of beech blocks in various directions were evaluated. Finally, the factors on the elastic constants of beech blocks were investigated by considering six different strain-measuring methods. Experimental analyses found that sanded and speckled blocks had nearly identical strain contours when subjected to compressive loading in radial (R), tangential (T), and RT45° grain orientations, respectively. The length of the damage zone was significantly affected by grain orientation, load level, and damage zone location. The ratios of the length of the damage zone to the length of the tested block in different grain orientations ranged from 0.041 to 0.074 at proportional limit load and 0.045–0.078 at yield load. The mean ratio of each of the three elastic moduli measured in two ends of a tested beech block to one measured in its middle section ranged from 0.41 to 0.58. The length of the damage zone measured in tested beech blocks tended to show a negative correlation to its measured elastic moduli. These findings could provide a basic understanding of damage zones to analytical and numerical modeling of orthotropic deformations of beech wood.

Abstract Image

不同晶粒取向山毛榉块体压缩损伤区分析及其对弹性常数的影响
研究了山毛榉试件在压缩载荷作用下的损伤区域及其对正交异性变形和弹性常数的影响。首先研究了表面处理(砂化和斑点化)对应变轮廓的影响,然后评估了晶粒取向、损伤区位置和载荷水平对损伤区长度的影响。随后,评估了损伤区位置对不同方向山毛榉块体弹性模量的影响。最后,考虑6种不同的应变测量方法,研究了影响山毛榉块体弹性常数的因素。实验分析发现,在径向(R)、切向(T)和RT45°晶粒取向的压缩载荷下,砂化块和斑点块具有几乎相同的应变轮廓。晶粒取向、载荷水平和损伤区位置对损伤区长度有显著影响。在比例极限荷载下,不同晶粒取向损伤区长度与试件长度之比为0.041 ~ 0.074,屈服荷载下为0.045 ~ 0.078。在被测山毛榉块两端测得的三个弹性模量与中间测得的弹性模量之比的平均值为0.41 ~ 0.58。试验山毛榉试件损伤区长度与其弹性模量呈负相关。这些研究结果可以为山毛榉木材正交各向异性变形的分析和数值模拟提供基本的损伤区域认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wood Science and Technology
Wood Science and Technology 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Wood Science and Technology publishes original scientific research results and review papers covering the entire field of wood material science, wood components and wood based products. Subjects are wood biology and wood quality, wood physics and physical technologies, wood chemistry and chemical technologies. Latest advances in areas such as cell wall and wood formation; structural and chemical composition of wood and wood composites and their property relations; physical, mechanical and chemical characterization and relevant methodological developments, and microbiological degradation of wood and wood based products are reported. Topics related to wood technology include machining, gluing, and finishing, composite technology, wood modification, wood mechanics, creep and rheology, and the conversion of wood into pulp and biorefinery products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信