Transport properties of Si ions moving through He gas

IF 1.5 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 OPTICS
Syham Lias, Larry Viehland, Meriem Haine
{"title":"Transport properties of Si ions moving through He gas","authors":"Syham Lias,&nbsp;Larry Viehland,&nbsp;Meriem Haine","doi":"10.1140/epjd/s10053-025-00999-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, we revisit the mobility and diffusion coefficients of Si<sup>+</sup> ions in their ground <sup>2</sup>P state moving in helium gas using quantum–mechanical transport cross sections. We have built the Si<sup>+</sup>-He potential from reliable and very recent energy points. These data points used in our construction are smoothly connected to adequate long- and short-range shapes, and calculations of classical cross section coefficients are also calculated. For the first time, we report transport coefficients for Si⁺(<sup>2</sup>P) across a wide range of reduced fields (10–1000 Td) and temperatures (100–500 K), achieving uncertainties of &lt; 3% (low T) and &lt; 5% (high T). While prior theoretical studies (Tuttle et al. in Mol Phys 115:437, 2017; Davies et al. in Phys Chem Chem Phys 24:7144, 2022) could not resolve whether the <sup>2</sup>P<sub>3/2</sub> or <sup>2</sup>P state aligns with experimental mobility data (Fahey et al. in J Chem Phys 75:669, 1981), our results demonstrate that neither the <sup>2</sup>P ground state nor its substates reproduce Fahey’s measurements within experimental uncertainty (± 5%). The discrepancy (8–12% at E/N &lt; 50 Td) arises from quantum resonances in the momentum-transfer cross section (see Fig. 7, inset), which are absent in classical models. We corroborate Viehland’s hypothesis (Viehland et al. in Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 20:95, 2017) that the low-pressure conditions (0.25–0.45 Torr) in Fahey’s experiment suppressed collisional excitation, favoring a non-statistical population of spin–orbit states. These findings challenge assumptions about ion–neutral interactions at low energies and underscore the need for state-resolved experiments.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":789,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal D","volume":"79 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal D","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjd/s10053-025-00999-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we revisit the mobility and diffusion coefficients of Si+ ions in their ground 2P state moving in helium gas using quantum–mechanical transport cross sections. We have built the Si+-He potential from reliable and very recent energy points. These data points used in our construction are smoothly connected to adequate long- and short-range shapes, and calculations of classical cross section coefficients are also calculated. For the first time, we report transport coefficients for Si⁺(2P) across a wide range of reduced fields (10–1000 Td) and temperatures (100–500 K), achieving uncertainties of < 3% (low T) and < 5% (high T). While prior theoretical studies (Tuttle et al. in Mol Phys 115:437, 2017; Davies et al. in Phys Chem Chem Phys 24:7144, 2022) could not resolve whether the 2P3/2 or 2P state aligns with experimental mobility data (Fahey et al. in J Chem Phys 75:669, 1981), our results demonstrate that neither the 2P ground state nor its substates reproduce Fahey’s measurements within experimental uncertainty (± 5%). The discrepancy (8–12% at E/N < 50 Td) arises from quantum resonances in the momentum-transfer cross section (see Fig. 7, inset), which are absent in classical models. We corroborate Viehland’s hypothesis (Viehland et al. in Int J Ion Mobil Spectrom 20:95, 2017) that the low-pressure conditions (0.25–0.45 Torr) in Fahey’s experiment suppressed collisional excitation, favoring a non-statistical population of spin–orbit states. These findings challenge assumptions about ion–neutral interactions at low energies and underscore the need for state-resolved experiments.

Graphical abstract

Abstract Image

Si离子在He气体中的输运性质
在本研究中,我们利用量子力学输运截面重新研究了Si+离子在氦气中以2P基态运动的迁移率和扩散系数。我们已经从可靠的和最近的能量点建立了Si+-He势。在我们的结构中使用的这些数据点平滑地连接到适当的长距离和近距离形状,并计算了经典截面系数的计算。我们首次报道了Si + (2P)在宽范围的还原场(10-1000 Td)和温度(100-500 K)下的输运系数,实现了<; 3%(低T)和<; 5%(高T)的不确定性。而之前的理论研究(Tuttle et al. in Mol Phys 115:437, 2017;Davies等人在《物理化学物理》24:7144,2022)中无法解决2P3/2或2P态是否与实验迁移率数据一致(Fahey等人在《化学物理》杂志75:669,1981),我们的结果表明,2P基态及其子态在实验不确定度(±5%)内都不能再现Fahey的测量结果。这种差异(E/N <; 50 Td时的8-12%)是由动量传递截面中的量子共振引起的(见图7,插入),这在经典模型中是不存在的。我们证实了Viehland的假设(Viehland et al. in Int J Ion Mobil spectrum 20:95, 2017),即Fahey实验中的低压条件(0.25-0.45 Torr)抑制了碰撞激发,有利于自旋轨道态的非统计总体。这些发现挑战了低能量下离子中性相互作用的假设,并强调了状态解决实验的必要性。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The European Physical Journal D
The European Physical Journal D 物理-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Physical Journal D (EPJ D) presents new and original research results in: Atomic Physics; Molecular Physics and Chemical Physics; Atomic and Molecular Collisions; Clusters and Nanostructures; Plasma Physics; Laser Cooling and Quantum Gas; Nonlinear Dynamics; Optical Physics; Quantum Optics and Quantum Information; Ultraintense and Ultrashort Laser Fields. The range of topics covered in these areas is extensive, from Molecular Interaction and Reactivity to Spectroscopy and Thermodynamics of Clusters, from Atomic Optics to Bose-Einstein Condensation to Femtochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信