Biogas slurry acts as a “microbial gatekeeper” to lower the spread risk of antibiotic resistance genes in soil-lettuce system

IF 4.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Yazhan Ren , Qinping Sun , Yufei Li , Junxiang Xu , Qianqian Lang , Jijin Li , Xiang Zhao
{"title":"Biogas slurry acts as a “microbial gatekeeper” to lower the spread risk of antibiotic resistance genes in soil-lettuce system","authors":"Yazhan Ren ,&nbsp;Qinping Sun ,&nbsp;Yufei Li ,&nbsp;Junxiang Xu ,&nbsp;Qianqian Lang ,&nbsp;Jijin Li ,&nbsp;Xiang Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.106212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The risk of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) from livestock manure has attracted extensive attention. However, the impacts of products at various stages of organic fertilizer production on ARGs in soil-lettuce system haven't been comprehensively evaluated. This study looked into the impacts of these products (cow manure, biogas slurry, biogas residue, and organic fertilizer) on transport and bioaccumulation of ARGs in soil-lettuce system by high-throughput quantitative PCR. Results showed that the relative abundance of ARGs in cow manure treatment (CM) and organic fertilizer treatment (OF) were reduced in soil (52.94 % and 41.18 %, respectively) compared to CK. Biogas slurry treatment (BS) had the lowest relative abundance of ARGs in all treatments with the value in root, inner leaf, and outer leaf being 0.07, 0.03, and 0.08 copies/16S rRNA gene copies, respectively (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). For core ARGs, biogas residue treatment (BR) had the highest abundance in soil, while BS had the lowest abundance in plant parts. For high-risk ARGs, CM and OF treatments led to high abundance of <em>aac</em>(<em>6</em>′)<em>-Ib-03</em> gene in soil, but BS treatment reduced the abundance of high-risk ARGs in lettuce. BS treatment exhibited a distinct bacterial network and fewer ARGs-bacteria correlations, probably due to the selective promotion of <em>Proteobacteria</em> and its nutrient cycling groups. ARGs were enriched in plant tissues (bioaccumulation factor (BAF) &gt; 1) at CM and OF treatments, while were suppressed in aerial parts (inner and outer leaves) of BS, flooded with biogas slurry (BSF), and BR treatments. Overall, different products at various production stages have various effects on ARGs spreading in soil-plant system. BS and BR may be good at controlling ARGs spreading and provide guidance for waste treatment and agricultural production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8099,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soil Ecology","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 106212"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soil Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929139325003506","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The risk of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) from livestock manure has attracted extensive attention. However, the impacts of products at various stages of organic fertilizer production on ARGs in soil-lettuce system haven't been comprehensively evaluated. This study looked into the impacts of these products (cow manure, biogas slurry, biogas residue, and organic fertilizer) on transport and bioaccumulation of ARGs in soil-lettuce system by high-throughput quantitative PCR. Results showed that the relative abundance of ARGs in cow manure treatment (CM) and organic fertilizer treatment (OF) were reduced in soil (52.94 % and 41.18 %, respectively) compared to CK. Biogas slurry treatment (BS) had the lowest relative abundance of ARGs in all treatments with the value in root, inner leaf, and outer leaf being 0.07, 0.03, and 0.08 copies/16S rRNA gene copies, respectively (P < 0.05). For core ARGs, biogas residue treatment (BR) had the highest abundance in soil, while BS had the lowest abundance in plant parts. For high-risk ARGs, CM and OF treatments led to high abundance of aac(6′)-Ib-03 gene in soil, but BS treatment reduced the abundance of high-risk ARGs in lettuce. BS treatment exhibited a distinct bacterial network and fewer ARGs-bacteria correlations, probably due to the selective promotion of Proteobacteria and its nutrient cycling groups. ARGs were enriched in plant tissues (bioaccumulation factor (BAF) > 1) at CM and OF treatments, while were suppressed in aerial parts (inner and outer leaves) of BS, flooded with biogas slurry (BSF), and BR treatments. Overall, different products at various production stages have various effects on ARGs spreading in soil-plant system. BS and BR may be good at controlling ARGs spreading and provide guidance for waste treatment and agricultural production.
沼液可作为“微生物看门人”,降低抗生素抗性基因在土壤-生菜系统中的传播风险
畜禽粪便中抗生素耐药基因(ARGs)的风险引起了广泛关注。然而,有机肥生产各阶段产品对土壤-生菜系统ARGs的影响尚未得到全面评价。采用高通量定量PCR技术,研究了牛粪、沼液、沼渣和有机肥对土壤-生菜体系中ARGs迁移和生物积累的影响。结果表明:与对照相比,牛粪处理(CM)和有机肥处理(of)降低了土壤中ARGs的相对丰度(分别为52.94%和41.18%);沼液处理(BS)的ARGs相对丰度最低,根、内叶和外叶的ARGs相对丰度分别为0.07、0.03和0.08个拷贝/16S rRNA基因拷贝(P <;0.05)。对于核心ARGs,沼渣处理(BR)在土壤中的丰度最高,而BS在植物部位的丰度最低。对于高风险ARGs, CM和OF处理导致土壤中aac(6’)-Ib-03基因丰度较高,但BS处理降低了生菜中高风险ARGs的丰度。BS处理表现出明显的细菌网络和较少的args -细菌相关性,可能是由于Proteobacteria及其营养循环群的选择性促进。ARGs在植物组织中富集(生物积累因子,BAF);1)在CM和OF处理下,在牛蒡的地上部分(内外叶)、淹沼液处理和BR处理下均被抑制。综上所述,不同生产阶段的产品对土壤-植物系统中ARGs的扩散有不同的影响。BS和BR可以很好地控制ARGs的扩散,并为废物处理和农业生产提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Soil Ecology
Applied Soil Ecology 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
363
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soil Ecology addresses the role of soil organisms and their interactions in relation to: sustainability and productivity, nutrient cycling and other soil processes, the maintenance of soil functions, the impact of human activities on soil ecosystems and bio(techno)logical control of soil-inhabiting pests, diseases and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信