Impact of Social Vulnerability Index and Distance to Tertiary Ocular Emergency Department in Patients Presenting with Open Globe Injury

IF 4.6 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Davina A. Malek MD , Jason A. Greenfield BS , Timothy Norris PhD , Swarup S. Swaminathan MD , Kara M. Cavuoto MD
{"title":"Impact of Social Vulnerability Index and Distance to Tertiary Ocular Emergency Department in Patients Presenting with Open Globe Injury","authors":"Davina A. Malek MD ,&nbsp;Jason A. Greenfield BS ,&nbsp;Timothy Norris PhD ,&nbsp;Swarup S. Swaminathan MD ,&nbsp;Kara M. Cavuoto MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xops.2025.100802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the impact of Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and the distance to a tertiary eye emergency department (ED) on presenting visual acuity (VA), final VA, and rates of VA change over time in patients presenting with open globe injury (OGI).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Patients with OGI from 2018 to 2021 were identified from the electronic health records using the International Classification of Diseases coding system.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data collected included demographics, insurance status, follow-up visits, and VA measurements. Social Vulnerability Index scores were calculated using a US Census Geocoder and stratified into quartiles, and distances to the eye ED were calculated. Simple logistic regression models evaluated the associations of presenting and final VAs with SVI, distance, baseline characteristics, and time from injury to presentation, adjusting for potential confounders. Univariable and multivariable linear regression models analyzed the associations between VA rates of change over time and SVI, distance to ED, demographics, insurance, and presenting VA.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The relationship between SVI and distance on presenting VA, final VA, and rates of longitudinal VA change over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 446 patients presented with an OGI. Of these patients, 337 (75.0%) with complete SVI data were included in the final analysis. Social Vulnerability Index was associated with nearly a fourfold increased risk of worse presenting VA in populations with higher vulnerability compared with those with lower overall vulnerability (odds ratio [OR] = 3.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34–11.05; <em>P</em> = 0.012). Greater distance from the eye ED was also a contributing factor to higher risk of poorer presenting VA (OR = 2.55; 95% CI: 1.42–4.60; <em>P</em> = 0.002). On multivariable analyses, longitudinal VA change over time was not impacted by SVI (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05 for all groups), and final visual outcome was not associated with either SVI or distance to the eye ED.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Greater distances from the eye ED and social vulnerability were associated with a higher risk of worse VA at presentation. However, no significant impact of SVI or distance was observed on long-term VA changes and final visual outcome on the multivariable analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Financial Disclosure(s)</h3><div>The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74363,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology science","volume":"5 5","pages":"Article 100802"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666914525001009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and the distance to a tertiary eye emergency department (ED) on presenting visual acuity (VA), final VA, and rates of VA change over time in patients presenting with open globe injury (OGI).

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Participants

Patients with OGI from 2018 to 2021 were identified from the electronic health records using the International Classification of Diseases coding system.

Methods

Data collected included demographics, insurance status, follow-up visits, and VA measurements. Social Vulnerability Index scores were calculated using a US Census Geocoder and stratified into quartiles, and distances to the eye ED were calculated. Simple logistic regression models evaluated the associations of presenting and final VAs with SVI, distance, baseline characteristics, and time from injury to presentation, adjusting for potential confounders. Univariable and multivariable linear regression models analyzed the associations between VA rates of change over time and SVI, distance to ED, demographics, insurance, and presenting VA.

Main Outcome Measures

The relationship between SVI and distance on presenting VA, final VA, and rates of longitudinal VA change over time.

Results

A total of 446 patients presented with an OGI. Of these patients, 337 (75.0%) with complete SVI data were included in the final analysis. Social Vulnerability Index was associated with nearly a fourfold increased risk of worse presenting VA in populations with higher vulnerability compared with those with lower overall vulnerability (odds ratio [OR] = 3.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34–11.05; P = 0.012). Greater distance from the eye ED was also a contributing factor to higher risk of poorer presenting VA (OR = 2.55; 95% CI: 1.42–4.60; P = 0.002). On multivariable analyses, longitudinal VA change over time was not impacted by SVI (P > 0.05 for all groups), and final visual outcome was not associated with either SVI or distance to the eye ED.

Conclusions

Greater distances from the eye ED and social vulnerability were associated with a higher risk of worse VA at presentation. However, no significant impact of SVI or distance was observed on long-term VA changes and final visual outcome on the multivariable analyses.

Financial Disclosure(s)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
社会脆弱性指数和距离对开放性眼球损伤患者三级眼急诊的影响
目的评价社会脆弱性指数(SVI)和到三级眼科急诊科(ED)的距离对开放性眼球损伤(OGI)患者的视力(VA)、最终VA和VA随时间变化率的影响。设计回顾性队列研究。使用国际疾病分类编码系统从电子健康记录中确定2018年至2021年患有OGI的参与者。方法收集的数据包括人口统计、保险状况、随访和VA测量。使用美国人口普查地理编码器计算社会脆弱性指数得分,并将其分层为四分位数,并计算到眼睛ED的距离。简单的逻辑回归模型评估了出现和最终VAs与SVI、距离、基线特征和从损伤到出现的时间的关系,并对潜在的混杂因素进行了调整。单变量和多变量线性回归模型分析了VA随时间变化率与SVI、到ED的距离、人口统计学、保险和呈现VA之间的关系。主要结果测量SVI与呈现VA的距离、最终VA和纵向VA随时间变化率之间的关系。结果共446例患者出现OGI。在这些患者中,337例(75.0%)具有完整SVI数据的患者被纳入最终分析。与总体脆弱性较低的人群相比,脆弱性较高的人群的社会脆弱性指数与表现较差的VA风险增加近4倍相关(优势比[OR] = 3.85;95%置信区间[CI]: 1.34-11.05;P = 0.012)。离眼ED的距离越远,VA表现越差的风险也越大(OR = 2.55;95% ci: 1.42-4.60;P = 0.002)。在多变量分析中,纵向VA随时间的变化不受SVI的影响(P >;最终视力结果与SVI或与眼ED的距离无关。结论:距眼ED的距离越大,社会脆弱性越大,呈现时眼VA恶化的风险越高。然而,在多变量分析中,没有观察到SVI或距离对长期VA变化和最终视觉结果的显著影响。财务披露作者在本文中讨论的任何材料中没有专有或商业利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmology science
Ophthalmology science Ophthalmology
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
89 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信